Chariots of the Gods (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
31 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
One Sided But Historically Interesting
Corolla-227 August 2008
I was 11 years old in 1973 when I read some of "Chariots of the Gods?" and saw "In Search of Ancient Astronauts," a condensed version of this 1972 documentary. As a kid, you are impressible and can be enthralled by these new ideas, that maybe aliens helped humankind along the way to advanced civilization.

As an adult seeing "Chariots of the Gods" 35 years later, I was amazed at the claims the narrator sometimes makes, leaving out significant background details and being excessively one sided. There are several specific examples. In the first, a visit is made to the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, where a set of curved tubes is said to be the exhaust port on the bottom of the rocket (and the base of a Saturn one is shown for comparison). However, no details are given of where the artifact was found, how old it was or what mainstream archaeologists thought it was.

In the second, there were statues in Mexico, who were claimed to be wearing odd hats, communication or utility devices on their chests and perhaps weapons or communicators on their belts. No alternative opinion was presented, such as the "communicators" might just be ordinary breastplates, and the hats some kind of ornamental warrior headgear. Additionally in Pelenque, Mexico, a sarcophagus lid for the Mayan leader Pacal is supposed to be a rocket ship, with no additional explanation given that his "rocket" might actually be a collection of Mayan symbols representing the king's passage to the underworld, and the meaning of these symbols unknown to few modern people except archaeologists specializing in pre-Columbian history.

I liked the crazy, spacey soundtrack, which ranged from early '70s electronica to New Ageish acoustic, and the cinematography, much shot from the skies -- the way these alleged "ancient astronauts" might have seen the earth! There just wasn't enough evidence presented that aliens created all these mysteries, which certainly are unexplainable.

Spacemen? I don't know. The theory that humans, not aliens, reached a high level of civilization thousands of years ago -- say more like late 21st century -- only to have it destroyed by a natural disaster, such as an ice age, seems like a more probable explanation for the supposedly advanced technologies in ancient artifacts and even the strange costumes. People knocked back to the stone age by a disaster over generations could have forgotten their heritage, old costuming and technology and have only traces, which to them might become religious legends. They might record them on cave or cliff walls in images that look more familiar to us because we are advanced, just like their distant ancestors. And artifacts that were fabricated with technology similar to ours thousands of years ago also could have come from these very ancient humans, not a bunch of extraterrestrials!
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ridiculous
BandSAboutMovies14 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
In the alternate universe that was 1970, the German film Erinnerungen an die Zukunft (based on Erich von Däniken's book Chariots of the Gods?) made $26 million at the box office and was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature.

The film starts by discussing how native tribes found cargo from planes and began worshipping the flying machines as gods, which is probably how our ancestors saw ancient occupants of interplanetary craft.

Director Harald Reinl did movies in just about every popular German genre, from Edgar Wallace krimini, Karl May Westerns (both of these genres infuenced Italian giallo and westerns),mountain films, Heimatfilms ("hometown" rural movies), German war films and sequels to the Dr. Mabuse, Jerry Cotton and Kommissar X films.

In fact, his life ended like a krimini, as his wife, the former actress Daniela Maria Delis, stabbed him in their retirement home.

But let's get back to the aliens that came down from the sky and turned cavemen into human beings.

As mondos stopped shocking people in the 70's, the final place they could get audiences was to declare the Nazca Lines and crystal skulls and pyramids as not examples of our ancestors' genius, but instead proof that aliens came down to earth like the fallen angels from the Lost Books of the Bible - look for it on Glenn Danzig's bookshelves - and made us. There were so many versions of this movie, but this would be the one where it all gets going.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's Polemic to talk about this documentary...
Lady_Targaryen22 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
''Erinnerungen an die Zukunft '' (or easily speaking ''Chariots of the Gods) is a documentary based in Erich Von Daniken's book about the evidences for extraterrestrial influences on early human culture, like many artifacts, monuments, paintings and even the Piraymids from Egypt. It also gives the hypothesis that many ancient civilizations' technologies were given to us humans by those advanced ETs long time ago.

While you are reading the book or watching the documentary, is hard to not feel fascinated about the author's ideas and conclusions,specially if you a person who believes in the life outside the Earth or is interested in ETs and paranormal events. The author also uses a lot of logic arguments that helps everyone feels a little confused if that fact is right or just his invention. But not only many historians and scientists already proved many of Von Däniken's theories to be unreal, but also he confessed about fabricating premises and some photos.

In general, this documentary is not bad, but since is not even close to the reality, maybe taking time to watch something more reliable would be a better idea.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'm Not Saying It's Aliens....But It's Aliens
utgard1415 May 2014
Documentary based on Eric von Daniken's famous book, which deals with ancient mysteries and specifically whether aliens visited Earth centuries ago. The gimmick in the book is to suggest outlandish theories but always to phrase them in the form of a question. This way von Daniken can always backpedal and say things like "I didn't say that the Bible has aliens in it. I just asked what if it does?" It's a clever huckster's trick but it served him well as he made a career writing books like this using the same technique.

I love the footage of the various locations and artifacts. That the footage has that vintage '70s look is an added bonus. It's talky and a little dry but still interesting and worth a look. As far as documentaries on ancient aliens or forgotten history goes, this is pretty good. For the absolute best in this type of material, you'd have to watch the Leonard Nimoy "In Search Of..." series.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intriguing collection of anomalies
dbborroughs14 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Film version of the book by Erick Von Daniken that postulates that perhaps the weird creatures in painting, legends and tales were not gods or monsters but instead visitors from outer space. The film is essentially a travelogue of sights that march us from one location to another showing us intriguing painting, buildings and other sights. Dull when compared to the stuff that we see on the History and Discovery Channels on cable this film has no recreations just has a catalog of weird anomalies that may or may not point to something other that a man made influence. The film doesn't speculate as to the origin of the "ancient astronauts" it simply shows the strange stuff and lets the viewer decide. The film is more or less a highlight reel of early Von Daniken and his theories, which many scientists and scholars have dismissed (but at the same time I find that many who dismiss the premise do so either without having read any of his books or with out being as well read on the number of cultures as the author himself) This is an okay film that has been kind of hurt by the passage of time (remeber this was released in 1970). The film feel kind of static and while it hints very strongly that we could have been visited it doesn't spoon feed you that conclusion. The film can be a tough one to get through, but at the same time its less strident stance is better than many others on the subject which seem to trap you in a carnival come on. Will the film change your mind as to the possibility of visitation? I have no idea. The material in the film is ultimately too lacking in detail to put up a fully persuasive argument but it is the sort of thing that might nudge you in one direction. (Von Daniken doesn't say one thing is the key to his belief, rather the sheer number of odd things).

Worth a look if the subject interests you.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bringing an important theory to the masses
rocky_wood8 May 2003
This lively production loosely based on von Daniken's first work, 'Chariots of the Gods?' brought his theories of alien visitations in the past to the attention of the movie going audience. At that time it was a break-through in thinking. Since then von Daniken has presented dozens of more books of proofs, many of them more scientific and hard-nosed than this. As a result, there have been bookshelves full of other books on this subject, including those written by scientists, professors and other notable experts. Meanwhile, a campaign of debunking this whole theory is maintained by a clique of limited thinkers, believing in their arrogance, that this is the only world in the entire universe on which intelligent life arose - gimme a break! Watch it again for the joy of discovery. A tremendous soundtrack is a bonus
11 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hmmmmm....Really!!
vghb95a1 August 2008
I would imagine anyone who gone though the trouble of obtaining this film already knows about premise of Chariots of the Gods so I will save you the trouble. I am a fan of Leonard Nimoy's In Search of TV series and its pilot shows. In the shows the name Von Daniken and the book Chariots of the Gods were mentioned, and I remembered there is a documentary film from the book. So, I looked it up and watched it. While Chariots of the Gods is not as dramatic as the In search of: Ancient Astronauts narrated by the great Rod Serling, but it has that snazzy 70's Euro pop jazz going for it. The kind of music that reminds you that you are watching a low budget 1970 film from West Germany. Also, if you had watched Rod Serling's Ancient Astronauts or Outerspace Connection, you will noticed most of the footages from those films are from the Chariots of the Gods. The images of the film is quite good on the VCI Entertainment release DVD. Like other reviewers have said, if you turn the volume down this movie could make a good travelogue.

Also, like so many other reviewer have wrote, the narrator is no Rod Serling. As a matter of fact, I think he is about as dry as a glass of martini, with no olive. This film consists of him reading from the book with no sound bites of people who were interviewed. If you want answers of strange going on with those little green aliens then this film is not for you, because this movie offers questions, a lot of questions, but no answers. With rhetorical questions like: "Could the ancient Egyptian mummifies body to copy alien's hyper-sleep during space travel?" or "Could the stone drawing in the middle of Sahara desert thousand of years ago be that of UFOs?" or "Could that 5,000 years old Japanese figurine be that of an alien in a space suit?" make me want to put my finger to my cheek and go "Hmmmmmm....Is that so?" Even though most of the questions posed doesn't pass go on my mumbo jumbo filter, it is still good a fun watch on a boring summer afternoon. What can I say, I'm a sucker for this kind of stuff.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The dubious granddaddy of them all
InjunNose28 February 2022
In the beginning there was the book "Intelligent Life in the Universe," whose co-authors (Iosif Shklovsky and Carl Sagan) cautiously postulated that the ancient Babylonian legend of Oannes might represent an instance of paleocontact. There were also the Tassili frescoes, whose nominal discoverer (Henri Lhote) believed that they depicted extraterrestrial beings. And that was pretty much it.

Then, in 1967, came Erich von Däniken. Millions read his book "Chariots of the Gods?" and millions more saw this documentary film that was based on it. The viewer was presented with beautifully-shot footage of various archaeological ruins around the world (accompanied by Peter Thomas's shimmering, irresistible soundtrack), and the belief that "aliens built the Pyramids" became cemented in the popular consciousness. So, too, did the patently ridiculous notion that the Nazca lines of Peru were landing strips for alien aircraft. Von Däniken later conceded that he had simply made this up.

And that's the problem: he was happy to make things up if it sold books. Shklovsky and Sagan had emphasized very specific criteria in the interpretation of ancient legends as reports of contact between earthlings and intelligent extraterrestrial lifeforms, hence their careful choice of a single legend which *might* represent such contact. In von Däniken's view, any legend or pile of ruins was fair game; if it was old, then it was attributable to aliens. It goes without saying that this total indifference to accuracy has done enormous damage to the field of Paleo-SETI.

(Incidentally, von Däniken's critics have been just as indifferent in their dismissal of the Paleo-SETI theory's particulars, and two wrongs don't make a right. Yes, von Däniken is a clown, but that doesn't explain away the Piri Reis maps, whose mysteries were documented well before the ancient astronauts craze in Charles Hapgood's "Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings." And yes, *some* of the Tassili frescoes were faked, but the two featured prominently in this film--the horned faceless figure and the so-called Great God Mars--evidently are not among the fabrications. This can be confirmed via a Google search, but of course most people won't bother.)
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A fun and fascinating introduction to some of the mysteries of our world
flickeringtorches15 January 2006
I saw this movie with my parents and grandparents when it was still in the theater. Since then, I've also read the book, and then bought the movie when it came out on laserdisc. I've always enjoyed this genre.

As a documentary, the movie poses a lot of interesting questions about various enigmatic artifacts and suggests interpretations that dissent from the mainstream narrative of world history.

The movie was designed to encourage further investigation of the topics discussed and to get the viewer thinking about the subject matter in new ways. I commend Harald Reinl for his presentation of Erich von Däniken's work.

The movie features a lot of beautiful photography of seldom seen places, ancient petroglyphs and pictographs, frescoes on cathedral walls, and illustrated manuscripts from around the world, and that alone is worth the price of admission.

The movie has a unique soundtrack composed by Peter Thomas, reminiscent of the Star Trek original series soundtracks. In addition to the recurring theme, there are many fascinating little melodies included, played mostly on acoustic instruments with some electric guitar and bass to back it up.

Today, I have the movie on DVD and the soundtrack on CD. If you can find copies of them, they are worth buying.
25 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
His Bio Says It All
quitwastingmytime14 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Von Daniken is a writer, producer, and former hotel manager and convicted con artist. He was first convicted at age 19 for theft, then at age 29 for fraud and embezzlement. He was a hotel manager in Davos, Switzerland when he wrote Chariots of the Gods. At age 33 he was convicted again for fraud, embezzlement, and forgery, stealing $130,000. His second book Gods from Outer Space was written in prison.

Von Daniken's books were enormously popular, selling tens of millions of copies. Royalties from his books paid off his legal fees and fines. The reaction from academics was scathing. Carl Sagan wrote, "I know of no recent books so riddled with logical and factual errors as the works of Von Daniken."

Archaeologists and historians were equally critical, with some pointing to Von Daniken's racism for claims like "Was the black race a failure and did the extraterrestrials change the genetic code by gene surgery and then program a white or a yellow race?"

Von Daniken had a definite long term impact, seen in the influence on programs such as Ancient Aliens, for which he is a frequent [source.] Ancient Aliens angered scholars enough that they put out a feature length documentary debunking it, Ancient Aliens Exposed. Von Daniken also designed Mystery Park, a theme park based on ancient alien themes that opened in Switzerland in 2003. It closed in 2006 due to low turnout and financial failure. It briefly reopened in 2010."
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An around the world excursion regarding extraterrestrial visitors
emurray-224 April 2001
This is a fascinating tour of the world in search of hieroglyphic statements, cuneiform writings, and extremely heavy objects that were purportedly moved by extraterrestrial beings when they visited Earth.

Daniken's explanations may suggest how the pyramids were constructed in Egypt and the means by which the heavy statues of Easter Island arrived at their current sites all over the island.

In any event, it is fascinating to see aerial views of landing fields which extraterrestrial visitors may have fashioned for their purposes.

Virtually all continents seem to offer proof of such other worldly visitors.

It is a wonderful trip around the world. The cinematography is good.

Entertaining for those interested in far away places as well as for scientists.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Relaxingly Stupid
Steve_Nyland23 May 2011
Seriously, this is easily one of the most lunkheaded, stupid, poorly informed and yet enjoyable "documentaries" ever made. Very relaxing viewing. I read the book as a kid and adore the film as an adult, but please. It is an entertainment, not science, and can be fun provided you're stoned enough. What is so remarkable is that the book + film literally changed and influenced our popular culture in a manner that continues to this day; "Battlestar: Galactica", "Stargate", Jack Kirby's "The Eternals", several post-60s installments of "Star Trek", the list of pop culture forms that harvested Erich Von Daniken's fanciful ramblings goes on & on, and some are quite good.

See, the problem with this film is that it tries to teach its viewers to be lazy observers & simple-Simon thinkers. For example: You see lines scratched on a desert highland which resembles the patterns of an airport viewed from above. To conclude therefore that the lines *must* be the remnants of an ancient airport to the exclusion of all other possible conclusions just because that's what it looks like suggests a grave limitation in comparative reasoning.

It also presumes that ancient alien astronauts would need an airport to land their space ships with extended diagonal runways stretching across the desert soil as far as the eyes can see. That means you are limiting the technology available to the aliens to that which would require an airport -- You are creating a foregone conclusion with only one possible explanation fitting the lazily observed data. Von Daniken even says in his book that it cannot possibly be anything else. Oh really?

Which is the basis of all conspiratorial reasoning. You conclude beforehand that the building was blown up by a controlled demolition and then you cherry pick only those clues which support that conclusion & jettison those which suggest anything else. Need spaceships? Look for depictions of angels in flight. Need space suited aliens? Any cave drawing with a stylized human figure will do, the more sloppily executed the better. Just make sure it's enigmatic enough to defy a literal interpretation and you're home free. Anything can be the result of contact with ancient alien astronauts once you let your mind wander far enough afield.

Then you start churning through the funny looking cultural artifacts, the bizarre statuettes and other cultural forms which do not resemble classically executed images of representation we are accustomed to. Bulbous head? Space alien. Stringy looking arms? Space alien. Seated or crouched position? Space alien. Non-human head attached to stylized form? Space alien. Imprecise written account from historical documents? Space alien. One would think we were passive observers in our own pre-history. I am sure the Mayans would have been amused to learn that their gods required oxygen helmets.

Then you muddle it all down with doublethink employing terms that sound scientific & reasonable, peppered with a tad of ridicule to put anyone who won't go along with your conclusion on the outside. Now it's you & a select few against the world with your secret insights and private knowledge. Everybody else becomes a bumpkin for following the "mainstream" thinking, which is usually remarkably boring in comparison to the idea of space aliens sweeping down from the heavens to teach our ancestors how to levitate railroad car sized blocks of stone. And then you pose these conclusions in the form of "questions" so that you can deny being dumb enough to have said so. You were just asking questions ... sound familiar?

But it's a fascinating movie with superb music, made by German film craftsman Harald Reinl with a visual power that is difficult to deny. One aspect of which is capturing the ancient monuments on film as they appeared in the late 1960s, before most of them were restored to their present day tourist-friendly look complete with snack stands & souvenir shops. You can really get a feel for how those Mayan cities were swallowed by the jungle, and what a jumbled mess Easter Island was before we figured out what the deal was with the statues, how they were supposed to be lined up, who made them, and why they probably did it. If the film served a useful purpose it may have been to inspire a generation or three of young scientists to figure out some of the riddles being posed.

For that matter the film represents a more innocent era for modern man, when we could gaze at mysteries like the Easter Island statues and just marvel at them in awe. Nowadays Easter Island speaks for a tragedy where a whole people were wiped out by outside invasion, famine, and eventually disease spread by contact with the Western world. Kind of a bummer compared to heroic alien cosmonauts descending in their rocket ships to immortalize themselves in stone for us to ponder over so many eons later.

If only it were. Also were I to criticize the film stylistically it is for being too one-sided. There's no voice of "the other" suggesting any contrary conclusions just like all good conspiracy theory entertainments. After all, that would distract from the stunning conclusions that all of our pre-history was shaped by contact with space aliens, since those blocks of stone are too big for even a modern day crane to move, etc etc etc. It's a marvelously stacked deck, though just as long as you are aware of that going in it can be fun to follow along at home. Just don't take any of it too seriously, the photography is great, enjoy the music, and pass the munchies dude.

4/10
24 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poorly done "documentary" on claims for aliens having been responsible for most of humanity's accomplishments
dashadow18 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I watched "Chariots of the Gods," as it was known as in the United States, when it was originally released and was rather bored by it, if it were not for the great footage of sites from all over the world I would have probably fallen asleep. The narration is bland, uninspiring,and uninformative. There are a few cases where the narration is unintentionally funny. When discussing a 40,000 year old bison skull the movie states the bison was killed by a high speed bullet and, "The beast was alive when killed." I didn't mean to say it out loud, but I said, "Most animals ARE alive when they are killed. How else could they be killed?" and got a good laugh from the audience near me. As is typical in this sort of film things are taken out of context, questions are asked, but not answered, and simpler explanations are ignored. I bought my copy as part of a double feature DVD issued by EastWestDVD.com. The second feature on the disk is a turkey entitled "Astral Factor" and also known as, "Invisible Strangler." I think the most telling thing about this movie is that the credits say it is "Based upon the novels" by Erich von Däniken which indicates that the producers felt the premise of the film was fictional. I have never understood how the movie was ever nominated for an Oscar in the best documentary category, because as I was leaving the theater, everyone I heard talking about the film felt they had wasted their money. At $1.00, or 50¢ if you divide it over the two films, the movie is worth watching for the location shots.
18 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wow!
Varlaam18 November 1998
I still recall what a stunning impact this "documentary" had on my family -- including my father, a professor -- when we saw it on television in the early '70's.

Of course, all of von Däniken's assertions have been thoroughly and utterly debunked in the meantime, and von Däniken turned out to be a complete fraud, but still, this was the first time I had ever heard of the Plains of Nazca, so I have to thank Erich for that.

I much prefer the German title to the English: "Erinnerungen an die Zukunft" or "Memories of the Future".
28 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
INADEQUATE DOCUMENTARY ON VON DÄNIKEN'S CLAP-TRAP
J. Steed22 August 1999
The pseudo-scientific clap-trap of Erich von Däniken justly gets the cinematic treatment, unintentionally I'm afraid, it so-well deserves. This badly constructed documentary comprises both books by Von Däniken into 90 minutes of inadequately shot landscapes, plains, pyramids, excavations etc., held together by ploughshare editing, a rambling commentary and music that must give the impression that we really are seeing strange phenomena (cling, clang, cloink). The moments Von Däniken appears on the screen, I wondered whether he himself could not have been an alien. Of course no critical voices of the Von Däniken theories are heard, neither does he again admit that most of his theories were not his to start with.

It is interesting viewing, as is reading Von Däniken's books (they are still read!), for its contribution to the unbeatable tendency in society to pseudo-religion and pseudo-science, as the new-age movement for example, but - if physically possible - you better watch with one eye on the film and the other on Ronald Story's book "The Space Gods Revealed".
16 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An important documentary
svenskaflicka902101 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is an important documentary, because it criticizes all the established theories. When I first saw it, i really first believed in it. Now I don't do it 100 %. But it made me think. It is a very bias documentary, but some of the point are good. Why where there maps that depicted the south pole under the ice in th 16th century?? That is a good question, which the established science have ignored. The south pole was first discovered and mapped in the 18th or 19th century. This documentary suggests that Aliens came down to earth and taught us many things. That is not my theory. My theory is that the human race was much more advanced once, before the last ice age. We know that the poles can shift, and that it has happened. Plus before the last ice age (20.000 - 25.ooo years ago) there were a lot warmer, plus they have found millions of years old bones of dinosaurs there. I think that an advanced human civilization once lived on the south pole. That explained a lot: we have a 16th century map of the pole under the ice, because the map from the ancient civilization was copied and copied again, from generation of learned people to the next. There a pyramids in Egypt, South America and somewhere in south east Asia. This explained that the once advanced human population of the south pole fled to the whole world after the ice age ruined their homelands, and they took their culture with them. All the depictions of gods, which are wearing helmets and breathing apparatus, are all because the advanced human race visited the primitive ones long ago. The advanced culture of humans explained the pyramids, all ancient cities, The sphinx (which has marks of irrigation on its back, which hints that it is as old as the recent wet-period in Egypt, which lies 25.000 - 35.000 years in the past, which is much older than it is acknowledged), how the pyramids were build, Balbeck in Lebanon, easter island and many other big ruins around the world. There is generally a feeling that people in the past were dumb - they were not. Just because they were not born in Europa or USA does not make people inferior. It is arrogantly of us in the west to assume the we invented everything first, and that advanced civilization started in the west.

This documentaries makes people think - and that is good.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
In A Nutshell - Pure WTF Bullshi*t!
strong-122-47888512 March 2018
Damn it all, anyway! I don't care one frickin' bit what "evidence" the so-called experts may have here to foist into my face in this "believe-what-you-like" documentary - Alien visitation is (IMO) all a total crock of you-know-what.

Based on Erich Von Daniken's well-publicized book - 1972's "Chariots of the Gods" is nothing but a highly-dubious presentation of pure novelty whose dead-seriousness (and total conviction to its subject matter) is actually quite laughable, for the most part.

Travelling the world over in order to present its "alien visitation" evidence as fact - I view "Chariots of the Gods" as simply being a well-crafted travelogue that's cleverly interspersed with hokey extraterrestrial info-dumps.

This is all, of course, absolutely contrived nonsense made to hoodwink the viewer into believing that alien visitation is, indeed, a reality and has occurred on this planet numerous times in the distant past.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Hello!? - Like - Are You Really Ready To Have The Wool Pulled Right Over Your Eyes?
When it comes to the completely far-fetched phenomenon of "Alien Visitation" - I am someone who will probably never be convinced that this has ever actually occurred on this here planet, Earth.

But, all the same - (While keeping an open mind on the matter) - I decided to watch "Chariots Of The Gods" anyway. 'Cause I really wanted to see what lengths those involved in this dubious production would go to in order to sway my beliefs (since I was sure that they would earnestly try to persuade me that alien beings from far off worlds had actually set foot on this here planet at various times in the past).

Well - To make a long story short - I think "Chariots Of The Gods" (though it was very well-produced) was nothing but a downright laughable hoax that (just like organized religion) one has to be pretty darn starry-eyed and completely gullible to take at face value what is being dished out to them as absolute truth... (Like - C'mon, already!)
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
My brief review of the film
sol-18 May 2005
Working with fascinating ideas and quite an intriguing subject, the film is always interesting to watch, but with a rather dull script it fails to be totally convincing or riveting. There is not much proof to back the ideas up either, and one of the biggest mysteries of the world, Stonehenge, is not even mentioned. Either way, the material that the film covers is generally good, in particular the Egyptian mysteries and the Easter Island statues. There is some really good on-location photography too, and it is all set to a perfectly fitting score. It is far from being perfect, and some of the ideas are out-of-date, however at the risk of repeating myself, it is quite fascinating, interesting stuff.
15 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Theories I personally have little interest in
Horst_In_Translation15 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Erinnerungen an die Zukunft" or "Chariots of the Gods" is west German documentary that runs for 100 minutes approximately and was nominated for an Oscar. It's not really happening too often that German-language films are nominated anywhere outside the Foreign Language category, so I was a bit curious about this one. The director and one of the writers is Harald Reinl who is mostly known today for his Winnetou works, but here, he enters a totally different territory which resulted (thanks to the previously mentioned nomination) into his biggest success probably. This documentary is about Swiss writer Erich von Däniken and his theories on extra-terrestrial life or his idea how some achievements and buildings on Earth can only be explained by an impact of aliens. He may be right or he may be wrong. I cannot decide that. And there will probably never be a time, in which we have certainty about this. There are some good points in this documentary and some not so good and I don't want to be a judge here when it comes to von Däniken. But I personally was not entertained well by this documentary. The contents and narration were frequently way too dry (maybe in order to appear scientific) to stay memorable to me. And I also do not care at all how certain pyramids were built. Do we really have to know all the circumstances? We never will anyway. Lets just enjoy the fact that these buildings and monuments are there. I do not recommend the watch. Thumbs down.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Still a brilliant film. A very disappointing DVD.
davenash015 October 2007
As a teenager I first saw this film at the cinema and loved it. It made me think not only are we not alone in the universe but also are we the first in the universe? I also fell in love with Peter Thomas' music score. I recently purchased the DVD and was totally appalled with the quality. It looked as if it was duplicated from the worst possible print that could be found. The soundtrack had more snaps, crackles and pops than a bowl of breakfast cereal. Although completely disappointed with the DVD I kept it as an example of the disrespect that some in the industry have for the product that they deal in. Fortunately I acquired the music soundtrack on CD and was overjoyed with the quality. My only hope is that someone who cares about the wonderful photography and score will pick up the movie for distribution and clean up the picture and sound prior to re-release.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Do you believe?
gortx21 January 2023
Every Sci-fi film fan and UFO follower of a certain age remembers Erich Von Daniken's theory that Alien Visitors came to the earth centuries ago and that the 'evidence' is out there in the form of old artifacts ancient civilizations left behind after they encountered extra-terrestrials. Peru's Nazca Lines, Easter Island's Heads, Stonehedge, various cave paintings and the great Pyramids themselves were proof that man had met space beings.

The 1968 book was a sensation eventually selling some 75 million copies, and this Documentary earned over $125M in today's box office dollars. The film was made in Germany and imported to the U. S. and distributed by the studio that was always a purveyor of quality entertainment, Sunn Classics in a new cut in 1973! Amazingly, the Doc wasn't only a big hit, but actually earned an Oscar nomination for Best Documentary (losing out to WOODSTOCK). There was even a soundtrack album!

CHARIOTS OF THE GODS was re-edited for TV on NBC as In Search Of Ancient Astronauts and narrated by Rod Serling followed by In Search of Ancient Mysteries also with the voice of Serling. The success fo the airings led to the Leonard Nimoy hosted In Search Of TV series. Von Daniken continues to expand on his theories and has produced several further books and Docs on the subject.

Do YOU believe??
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dated and disproved but fun to watch them try.
Bernie444421 October 2023
Yes, you might recognize this as the original 'Ancient Aliens' show. Maybe not so sophisticated but then again it is only an hour or so and of course not the book. Filmed in 1970 it was quite up to date for the time. This is based on Erich von Däniken's Chariots of the Gods? 1968.

A few facts were twisted and a few unknown at the time. However, the premise is that because people drew weird pictures or made difficult structures that we were visited and helped by doing what people can not do.

I did like that they brought up the Piri Reis maps which is also a favorite story. Charles Hapgood's 1966 book "Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings." Well, we do not want to get off the subject. Many reviews are polarized because of the subject but the film itself is a cheap and incomplete production.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Lovely Travelogue, but what's with the antiques?
bok60217 May 2004
Let me start off by saying that I love movies and documentaries about the paranormal, strange phenomena and unexplained mysteries. I particular enjoyed the old Rod Serling specials produced by Alan and Sally Landsburg, but I always regretted not having seen Chariots of the Gods.

I didn't miss anything.

On the face of it, this film would make a lovely travelogue of Mexico and South America because, despite the premise of exploring and/or revealing ancient mysteries, it actually does very little of either.

True, all the old familiar sites are visited, but the bland narration does little more than tell you that these places are associated with mysterious doings. It would be like a documentary on ghosts and hauntings showing only the exterior of the Amityville house and saying vaguely "...and the Lutz family claimed to have experienced something here, in this house."

The photography is very nice, the camera angles fresh and dramatic, but as I mentioned earlier, the narration (both the text itself and the narrators) is monotonously bland and surprisingly UN-informative; which negates any instructional value the film might have had as a documentary. Again, just change the narration and this could be a fine travelogue.

I suspect that the high ratings people give this title are based merely on that -the title and its association with the excellent and influential book- and less on the film itself. I also suspect that people are remembering the soundtrack LP (and later CDs) of the excellent Peter Thomas score -which ironically is almost unrecognizable in the garbled monaural sound mix of the film itself.

My opinion is that you should ignore this film and look instead at the much more dramatic and informative In Search of Ancient Astronauts (which is itself a far superior re-edit of this film, narrated by Rod Serling), or any of the other Landsburg productions, like In Search of Ancient Mysteries, The Outer Space Connection or Encounter With The Unknown.

For that matter, track down the old In Search Of... TV programs or Robert Stack ferreting out those Unsolved Mysteries.
8 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fascinating and Tedious at the same time.
ElijahCSkuggs28 May 2008
Like every single person who has seen this film, I share the love for the abnormal, the strange, the unknown. With the main issue focusing on Alien assistance, the movie certainly is intriguing. From topics of the Pyramids to the giant statues on Easter Island, the film covers topics that are truly mind-boggling. Ancient paintings that seem to detail visits from Aliens, huge blocks of rocks that weigh tons and tons are moved great distances....how? Even with today's technology some of the feats are impossible or just astronomically time-consuming. But back then, these feats were done in amazing time for their current tools/technology. Like I said, the movie focuses on these conundrums more than anything else, and it's just really damn fascinating. But, and there's a big butt, the movie is also slightly boring. With a pretty boring narrator and long drawn out shots that just go on for too long. This is not always the case, obviously, and the shots are also pretty amazing, when they show how gigantic these man-made marvels actually are. Chariots of the Gods is without a doubt worthy documentary to check out. It's undeniably interesting and important. Just a tad boring once in a while.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed