The Night Club (1925) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Adroit Assembly-Line Comedy
richardchatten11 March 2018
The plot of 'The Night Club' is a rather slapdash rehash of various tried and trusted comic situations - the millionaire playboy renouncing women and then his fortune when he changes his mind, and so on - but comes up a winner through the stature of its cast and a slick production.

With his round eyes and his moustache, Raymond Griffith somewhat resembles Jerry Colonna as he nimbly bounds through this yarn set in an unspecified Latin American country, where he find himself pursued with deadly intent by local bandit Wallace Beery on a bicycle.

Both Vera Reynolds and Louise Fazenda are robust ladies about the same height as Griffith himself; the latter unusually and enjoyably sexy & Amazonian as Beery's passionate Latin mistress who likes it when Griffith treats her rough.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A disappointing film
creightonhale5 September 2004
The print I saw contained inappropriate music. This fact became an irritation almost immediately and did interfere with my attempt to enjoy the film. The comedy is rather simplistic slapstick, although the wild car ride at the end is both humorous and exciting. The best comic performance is given by Louise Fazenda, in a brief appearance. Indeed, she was the reason I sought this film out to watch. Wallace Beery also acts up to effect in the scene involving Fazenda. Although Raymond Griffith was a popular comedian of the era, this film doesn't give much evidence as to why. There's little that's memorable about his performing, except maybe his dapper look. His art is probably better seen in some other work.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Go out and watch it
hte-trasme31 March 2010
This is now the second film I've seen (after "Paths to Paradise") starring Raymond Griffith, the talented comedian who was popular in the 1920s but who has now been largely forgotten due to the loss and unavailability of many of his films. As with the previous film, I was highly impressed.

Griffith was known as the "Silk Hat Comedian," though here he only dons it for the scenes where, appropriately, he is getting married (for the rest his is dressed nattily but in street clothes). This comedy is an out-and-out farce, with a plot that is humorously convoluted (Raymond has been stood up at the altar, so he renounces women just before he finds out that he has been left a fortune on the condition that he marry; he nonetheless goes abroad in search of escape from women, but ends up in the same town as his arranged bride), but develops smoothly and with great comic timing. It revels unashamedly in impossible coincidences, and laughs are drawn deliberately out of our reactions to one unlikely development after another. The "night club" of the title -- which apparently is a particular society allowing only confirmed bachelors -- is oddly mentioned in only one title card and then dropped; perhaps there existed more complete prints of this film that brought it in more.

A big part of Griffith's success in comedy seems to come from his natural expressiveness as an actor; he can do a huge amount with his face and body and play it in a serio-comic way that works perfectly for this kind of story. Even with all the complications, the plot proceeds in a clear line with a protagonist we can follow. That allows the broader gags (dozens of girls emerge into the hall as Raymond calls for his butler Gerley) to be all the funnier as they are integrated in seamlessly.

As much of "Paths to Paradise" revolved around variations on two people trying to steal the same jewels, much of the best comedy here derives from a hilarious black-comedy sequences in which Griffith, who now must convince his new love that he does not really want her only for the money he could inherit, makes several vain attempts to kill himself, each of which ends in the girl deriding it as a foolish ploy for attention. There's a wonderful escalating brilliance to the series of gags in which he is constantly foiled in his suicide attempts -- pulling down the chandelier in an attempted hanging, and ending up an another woman's arms in front of the girl he wants as he tried to make a bandit jealous enough to murder him.

By some miraculous quality, this film manages to retain a certain kind of deadpan believability even as it turns on some totally unbelievable points -- Griffith somehow sells credibly his quick decisions to renounce women, to un-renounce them, to kill himself, and not to kill himself -- and the humor and involvement come not just from the story and gags but from investment in character and his earnest, offbeat, desperate, and ever-polite attempts to extricate himself from his predicaments. A running gag where new developments cause Raymond continually to order his butler to move his things in and out of his hotel in preparation for moving or staying is highly funny and used just enough to keep it that way rather making it repetitious.

Griffith seems to have been able to impart that same deliberate emphasis and comic timing here to what could have been an unrestrained farce as to what could have been an average caper film. It's hilarious, and plays madcap events in an otherwise low-key way for a memorable effect. It takes what could have been countless unbelievable events and character choices and makes them acceptable while at the same time reveling in their exaggerated unlikeliness. I'm looking forward to seeing what more I can of Raymond Griffith's comedies, and more disappointed than before at the number of them which are presumed lost.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Film without Dialogue
Single-Black-Male12 December 2003
It's a pity that there was no dialogue in this film. The play was quite wordy, and in most of DeMille's talking films you find that there is a lot of fluffy dialogue without intimacy. I admire his efforts as a writer, but I don't think much of him as a writer. He is more of a painter than a writer.
0 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed