I've seen prior season episodes here and there but have watched all of the season 3 eps to date. The show's intro leads one to believe there are a ton of wrongfully convicted people behind bars, but in literally EVERY episode of S3 to-date (eps 1 thru 8), Chris and Fatima have sided with the jury. That's not really their fault, though; but, with a show called Reasonable Doubt, shouldn't the producers do a better job at vetting the cases in advance so that the hosts don't have to tell the loved ones of EVERY convict featured that, unfortunately, they can't get behind the reversal of the conviction and release of the inmate because they, too, believe they're guilty? Maybe the last 2 eps of the season will produce different outcomes, but I'm reasonably doubtful.
Review of Reasonable Doubt
