Seriously? This is psychoanalytic hubris at it's worst.
An example: 9: 38: "At first,he seems tense and uneasy. The efeminate face betrays submissiveness and sexual hunger."
Throughout, the commetator avidly imposes his own biased interpretation of Hitler's behaviour.
The viewer is advised to use extereme discretion in interpreting the commentators so-called 'interpretations' of Hitlers' behaviour!
Disclaimer: I am a psychologist, ex Bristish soldier, my uncle escaped Nazi internment and his father was a deserter from the German army who fought for the German resistance. I have no love for Hitler but the commentator is clearly operating to an ideological agenda and that does not serve the truth at all!
An example: 9: 38: "At first,he seems tense and uneasy. The efeminate face betrays submissiveness and sexual hunger."
Throughout, the commetator avidly imposes his own biased interpretation of Hitler's behaviour.
The viewer is advised to use extereme discretion in interpreting the commentators so-called 'interpretations' of Hitlers' behaviour!
Disclaimer: I am a psychologist, ex Bristish soldier, my uncle escaped Nazi internment and his father was a deserter from the German army who fought for the German resistance. I have no love for Hitler but the commentator is clearly operating to an ideological agenda and that does not serve the truth at all!