Taken (TV Series) Verum Nocet (2018) User Reviews

wtf

[dariouch-babai · 2 April 2018]

This episode smelled like long term propaganda, i hope the funding was good.

wasn't wikileaks careful against such harmful individual consequences, were there not appropriate filters?

not the case anymore? maybe i'm ignorant...

i was following this series, but the absence of long arc makes this kind of episode some kind of last drop in the bucket of boredom....

irritating. nothing to compensate for such propable bias in "balck op" type of series.

generic.

Who wrote this?

[dirkvh · 1/10 · 8 January 2020]

Even back in 2018 the wikileakers coordinated with US government to take out anything that could expose an agent. The writer of this piece is either dumb or paid by some organisation.

Also totally unbelievable that kilroy never objected to this!

American Propaganda

[robsoncameron · 1/10 · 14 May 2018]

Edward Snowdon and Julian Assange did the right thing in exposing the corruption of the US Government and the writer of this episode has just jumped on the US Gov't propaganda bandwagon. This episode has painted a picture of Wikileaks as a dangerous organisation, which the US Gov't would like people to believe. They provide valuable information to the public regarding the corrupt practises of individuals and Governments and I applaud them for it. This episode has completely spoiled my taste for this series and I'm glad it got cancelled.

Disappointed American propaganda

[joffreybogemans · 2/10 · 8 April 2018]

Really! I'm disappointed by this American propaganda and misleading information to viewer

Appaling

[chris-chalk · 1/10 · 17 January 2020]

I was 50/50 on this series, it's not great but was tolerable but this episode is the least nuanced load of propaganda I have ever seen.

It's an absolute disgrace that someone thought thois was ok to produce

Absolutely rediculous

[raven-262 · 1/10 · 27 October 2020]

Does this review contain spoilers? No! The episode IS a spoiler all in itself. A spoiler of common sense, a spoiler of truths, and a spoiler of 'good old American values' of which the USA never fails to tout it's horn.

This was by far the most biased view on whistle-blowers worldwide and wikileaks in particular. The depiction of Julian Assange and Edward Snowden is laughable and slanderous, and I think the writers, actors, producers all should be ashamed for creating such a reprehensible one-sided governmental advertorial.

Yes, the names were altered, but we all know who is being accused and smeared, and it's a disgrace. A disgrace for freedom, freedom of press, and human rights and values

What!!! Who through this was acceptable?

[Blueeyes97 · 1/10 · 5 April 2018]

This episode makes no attempt to hide who Peter Darien is based. Julian Assange is not some misguided journalist, he is and coward who fled justice and refused to face his alleged victim (for sexual assault) in Sweden

The depiction of him and his situation ,even though slight, in this episode without reference to his other crimes is insensitive and deeply disrespectful to his alleged victim(s) and to justice itself.

This is a real shame because I do enjoy this tv series but this episode has angered me enough to make this review.

P.s if you're reading this Mr Assange I wouldn't worry too much about the USA because if you ever step foot out of that embassy you will facjustice in a British court before being extradited anywhere!!