Waiting for the Bus (2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Had some issues, but I loved it
neilneir2 October 2022
I didn't have much expectation heading into this, as it's a young director. I just generally love watching different types of films and series purely for the enjoyment; I think watching people be wild and crazy and free is much more thrilling than those go-nowhere emotional rollercoasters, I still love them all though.

I know it's 2022 and everyone online is a bonafide critic, and negativity is all anyone brings to the table. I'm the opposite. I'd rather tell you what I liked about something, so here we go.

I loved the banter sequences, and the world just outside of the setting: birds, trees, cars, signs, random people who I found out were actors, cause they were so realistic.

I loved the actors. I don't believe any of them have made Hollywood names yet but that's ok in this instance.

I loved the editing. Well, mostly.

It has the perfect ending.

All that said, I noticed a few sound issues with some of the dialogue. But overall I had a blast with this film. Ethan F. Allen obviously took this role and killed it. Steve Fix is the man, and even at his age he still delivers a wacky guy to perfection. Lisa Laureta impressed me with her comedic chops. I would definitely watch this if it came on TV randomly. That's how much I've enjoyed it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Rewatched and reviewed
EvelynMaxinePark17 November 2022
I'll keep my review short. I will say that cinephiles and people that have patience will love it. Youtube generations might understand it. Don't listen to me though, just go watch it. I took two cinema classes in college and tried my hand a decade ago, with little to show for it. Though, seeing this, kind of inspired me to whip out the iPhone and try a few things.

Oh, and it's a comedy of sorts. I'd say the movie as a whole is SLICE OF LIFE meets DARK HUMOR. Intimate views, a good amount of reactions that made me wonder. This isn't a Hollywood movie, but it's still modern Hollywood. The actors are varied, but wholesome to a point, and vulnerable and vulgar. It's fantastic. Just watch it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
History repeats itself in cinema
SethConor1 October 2022
This is a new take on the classic single-setting type of film. I found it to be artsy. The film knows what it is, but still tries to show how to capture performances and reactions. The actors are nearing the same step with the theatre. The speeches are real, but loud, and no one is an incompetent idiot making their way around for a cheap laugh. It hits all the marks of longer shots of isolation followed with quick cuts of actions.

The cast is from all walks of life but their performances are all Oscar-worthy. There's the straight man, the random sexual deviant, the holier than thou Gen Z with her attitude, the conspiracy theorist, the oddball loud guy, the woman that won't get off her phone. They all arrive and that's where the fun begins.

It's a satire, a mystery disguised as a black comedy. I'm glad I watched it and recommend it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth Watching
ethical-684277 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I'm really surprised that the IMDb review section is so high for this film. It's a low-budget film that should be rewatched in order to find the little details like the ones I caught on the second viewing: the beginning credits section shows a handful of the actors pressing the button to signal the bus driver, the voices heard during the credits tell their own story, a few things said by the protagonist that hint at what he's doing there, the squinting of the eyes. It's actually deep!

It's an oddly likable film. The captured performances are done with a bit of shakycam, but also there's a few camera movements consciously placed in there. The sound quality is awful, which is why I gave it a lower rating. There's also a lot of obvious cinema influences. Dare I say I felt like there was a Shomin-geki aura to it. Who nowadays plants a camera at a tree and just stares at it? I liked it. It was new.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intriguing comedy-melodrama
Creditline21 December 2022
In the atmospheric mystery-comedy that is "Waiting for the Bus," Ethan F. Allen plays a regular guy having to be situated in one spot for longer than he'd like, which represents being a regular situation for any of us.

His character, Max, doesn't necessarily want to be there, but he has to be there. Why is he there is the question that drives the story. The movie starts with a steady pace, shown with notes of love to the big city of Los Angeles carefully dotting the beginning credits. When he finds himself abruptly confronted by the handful of Los Angelenos, such as Melody (Lisa Laureta) with her two dogs and her post-modern behaviors battling his old-school mentalities, or Mac (Alex Pierce-Ling) with his anti-government, Bigfoot-is-real manic propaganda, or Chauncy (Steve Fix) spouting crazy all over the screen, there's a lot of conflict, but also some agreements. Most movies try too hard to be deep but truly are superficial underneath, all trying to create an ethos of knowing why we're all here. This film tells those humble campfire stories happening in the late evenings that many know about but haven't experienced themselves.

These types of movies have evolved to become niche instead of broad strokes of the brush - as director Dena Derakhshan breaks down what could be vignettes for each of the characters into little hints of what the story is moving along towards. The path of each of us is differing, just like the story itself ranges from comedic to maddening personas we all deal with, though each person that shows up is wildly different from each other, they are all connected by the same way of being residents of a big city.

There isn't much scenery to watch for as it's all in one space, but that forces us to watch the characters. There are plenty of cutaways and one or two camera movements besides the intermittent montage of beauty that is Los Angeles. This is the director's second feature-film to direct, and by the end of the film it's an acknowledgement that he's on a path himself. But which path? This film, along with previous works have been relatively small projects for such a director who highlights action or thriller scenes in a handful of shots shown. The film, while not perfect, has many ideas shown, and spoken about. The best idea wins and when there's plenty of people and ideas involved, a few of them are gonna spark. What will be the result of these sparks? The careers of many for years to come.

In today's world with everyone having a 4K phone camera that make things look cinematic with the push of a button, our audiences are not ignorant as they were decades ago. The way to capture their spirit and dollars is by immersing them with characters that are interesting and realistic, with just a burst of over-the-top. This is what today's audiences crave and desire to be like those same characters.

Whether we like or dislike this film, there's no denying the talented cast and crew. One of the screenwriters and producers, Deborah Huerta (along with Derakhshan), has a way to show by hinting, and having the handful of characters talking about their own immediate needs while influencing what their true agendas are. Huerta brings in random quips that make you double-take while watching. So this makes the film a dark comedy of sorts that has an air of mystery that keeps your eyes glued.

"Waiting for the Bus" comes hot out of the post-pandemic crazy. It was filmed a few months after the Covid vaccines were available and filmed with a minimal cast and crew. The rocky camera show this, but it also feels as though it was meant to be Cinéma vérité. I'm not sure what to think after seeing the ending. Most storytellers want us to know everything about a film, but even the trailer barely gives us enough information to decide if it's the type of film to spend a little over an hour on. Maybe that's what is happening: The filmmakers want us to decide for ourselves.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed