"Maigret" Maigret et la demoiselle de compagnie (TV Episode 2004) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
"I have no aversions to any (social) classes, I just want to know what really happened."
garywhalen3 June 2024
Convinced that her employer was murdered, Cecile Ledru comes to Maigret to prompt an investigation. The young Cecile has been an assistant and companion to Madame Croizier, an elderly wealthy woman living in Bayeux who died soon after an appointment with her dentist. The woman died of a heart attack, as recorded by a physician, in her nephew's mansion. There were no indications of murder based on the condition of the body. The prosecutor warns Maigret to tread carefully as he delves into the lives of an upper class, connected family.

George Simenon's short story "The Old Lady of Bayeux" is the source for this solid episode in the Bruno Cremer "Maigret" series. The film follows the story very closely with two mild exceptions: 1) The film is set in Paris, whereas the original story is in Caen; 2) a death in the story is a bit more complex in the film. I can see why the filmmakers chose this short story as it provides a good mystery, clearly defined characters, and a plot that intrigues. (I'll add that though the plot is more Agatha Christie than typical Simenon, it works reasonably well here.)

Vanessa Larré, as the lady's companion, is perfectly cast as the demure lady's companion, and Vincent Winterhalter, as the nephew, captures the arrogant superiority of the upper class quite well. But there are others in small and large roles who play their parts quite well. Though the ending isn't perfect-while the denouement works it includes one minor (and odd) added piece not in the story-it's satisfying. I didn't notice until the end that this film is longer than average for this series, yet it's based on a "short" story.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Maigret traps a murderer DESPITE "le juge"!
Tony-Holmes13 June 2024
Saw this on the Talking Pictures channel (UK, old films and TV). They had previously shown the 1960s series (50+ episodes, BBC, B&W) featuring Rupert Davies, a generally acclaimed Maigret.

We've also seen the excellent 12 episodes (2 series) that ITV did (90s) with Michael Gambon as Maigret (terrific portrayal) and the less successful later efforts with Rowan Atkinson in the lead.

This Cremer version is of course French, with subtitles, but they are not too wordy, so fairly easy to follow. Also very French, lots of atmosphere, meaningful looks, thoughtful silences.

I see some reviews refer to how faithful this version is to the books, a ludicrous statement in one respect, as Lucas, his main assistant in all the books I've seen, has almost completely disappeared!

I haven't liked all the episodes so far of this Cremer version, but some have been great. THIS one however is WONDERFUL, though I expect it may upset some fans a little, the way this director chose to show it?

For hints re the plot, do see the review, as ever most informed, by Whalen.

The story shows Maigret being hindered by the examining magistrate (le juge) who naturally sides with the aristocratic family (his wife knows them).

Maigret, as ever, ferrets away at the principal characters, and derives significant snippets from the minor ones too, as the account being told by the main suspect has one or two inconsistencies.

Even the complainant is shown to have -- apparently - something to hide. WHO is telling which version of the truth, who can be trusted?!

We get a hint of a clue when Maigret talks to an embalmer (a great cameo performance) about how to pull off a perfect murder. And another with questions about what times things happened, and in which room the body was found. Why did they summon a doctor who was new to the family? Suddenly, when the case looks hopeless, we get a surprise piece of evidence, then another.

Eventually, against all the odds, the judge has to admit the evidence is persuasive, that indeed the routine heart attack was NOT what it seemed.

Trad fans may well howl that the evidence suddenly appeared, we had not seen Maigret direct his team to go and look for it, explicitly. But as a dramatic presentation, well done to the director, as the revelations were merely what detectives would look for, once they had a clue where to look.

As Whalen says, this episode was a little longer, BUT the time just raced by, a sure sign that the story was well told in this style.

Some of the episodes have been like watching paint dry, slowly, but NOT THIS ONE!

Sadly, we're in the last few episodes now, and Cremer actually only had a few more years to live, but his legacy lives on in these films, doubtless his family are proud.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed