Greed: The Series (TV Series 1999–2000) Poster

(1999–2000)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Who Wants to be a Millionaire: Team Version
Evil_Magus21 July 2006
It is extremely obvious that this show was made in the wake of Who Wants to be a Millionaire's popularity. The set almost exactly remade from it (save the addition of the multiple podiums), the sound-effects are nearly identical and the premise and feel virtually the same.

However, this is not Who Wants to be a Millionaire, although it comes fairly close. What makes this game different is the addition of the team and the Terminator. The team-play gives a fresh variance from it's predecessor, and the fact that the captain can either accept or eliminate any answer gives it another fresh element. In every other team-based game-show, the individual members of the team choose their answers. Here it still boils down to that one individual, although he gets constant suggestions instead of life-lines. The Terminator is the most original part of this show, which randomly will choose one team member to challenge another for their share in the money. My favorite part of the show, however, is when the host actually shows the captain the money, when he takes it out in front of them and fans it around a bit. I love game-shows, I really do, and in every other show I've seen you always lose your concept of money; you never quite remember exactly how much you've won. This grounds the contestants back into reality, forcing them to come to terms with what they can easily walk away with.

This show does have it's flaws. The questions are inconsistent, and can vary from the mundanely simple to the impossibly hard. I haven't seen them ever find a stride that's challenging, but still possible to answer with a fair bit of certainty. As I mentioned before, the set is FAR to reminiscent of Who Wants to be a Millionaire, in fact it's nearly identical. When they choose teams, I always found it annoying that they never showed the eliminated contestant's answer. And, finally, they wait far too long between answering the question and revealing the answer. It's a constant element to the show that begins to wear on a person after a few rounds.

However, the host is amiable and, as with the best of them, unobtrusive. However, much as he doesn't take anything away from the show, he really doesn't ADD to the show. But I suppose that this is preferable to one of the extremes.

Despite it's flaws, this really is an enjoyable show. It takes from Who Wants to be a Millionaire it's better components, while adding new aspects to keep it fresh. While the result is not nearly as good a show as that which it borrows from, it creates a better game-show than most others.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The only one that doesn't bore me
Oy17 May 2000
I have seen all the big money shows, and since "Twenty-One" and "Winning Lines" got axed, "Greed" is my favorite. I don't know why, but it's a great show. What really surprised me, though, is where it's taped: CBS Television City. I have deep interest in this studio, and many great game shows came from there. I am deeply surprised "Greed" is one of them. "Millionaire" to me is a total bore. I have seen them win it all, and now it just bores me. "Greed" is just better.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Excellent Gameshow
BSHBen24 August 2006
"Greed" is definitely one of the best game shows ever to air on television. The music and set for the show create a perfect, tense atmosphere. Chuck Woolery is a great host. The best part of the show is when he takes out giant wads of cash and offers them to the players.

The game play of "Greed" consists of a team of five people (a sixth player is eliminated before the actual game begins) trying to answer questions worth increasing amounts of money. After each question, the team captain can decide to quit and keep the money that the team has earned. The money is split equally between the players. However, once the questions become worth $200,000, between every question a terminator round occurs and players have a chance to eliminate another player by answering a question first. The terminator randomly selects a player, who then either selects the player that he wants to eliminate or chooses to not eliminate anybody. Chuck Woolery hands a challenging player $10,000 automatically. The winner gets the loser's share of the money.

"Greed" offers more money than just about any other game show, but as a rarity, the money is extremely hard to earn. Once the team reaches $200,000, each question has four correct answers out of 4-8 choices. Most of the questions are nearly impossible, and the teams need a lot of luck to get them right. On one episode, one person won $10,000 from a terminator attempt and nobody else won anything at all. Most teams lose once they reach $200,000, so the game gets really exciting when a team gets to a $500,000 question.

Overall, "Greed" is an entertaining, well-made show. Players can earn a lot of money (it should be noted that, if the team stops after the first question, then each player gets $5,000, the same amount that the winning two people on Supermarket Sweep get to share) but must answer super hard questions. Any fan of game shows should make sure to watch "Greed"
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fun game show
Catherine_Grace_Zeh14 July 2006
First off, I must say that this is a fun game show. Also, I'm not sure if I've seen every episode. However, I do know the show very well. Every time I watched it on FOX, I had a lot of fun playing along and watching. During that time, this made me long to be a contestant. The thing I liked most about it are the questions. Despite the fact that I don't know that many answers, I still have fun playing along. I hope the Game Show Network keeps it on so I can play along and watch again. If that happens, I will be really happy. Before I wrap this up, I'd like to say that I'll always remember this show in my memory forever. Now, in conclusion, I hope that you catch it one day before it goes off the air for good.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent Game show, it should be revived
smooth_op_8527 June 2019
This show was excellent. The contestants, the stakes, no safety net and the 4 answer questions were very difdicult.

I liked how yes, it was a millionaire ripoff but they did so much more and added teamplay, eliminations, an out before revealing whether the 4th answer was correct or not (usually 10% of the value of the ? the team was going for or a car for 1M and 2M questions. It was exciting, fresh and the music was dramatic as well as the 4th answer reveal. Chuck Woolery was great to host this and I emulate him when I play my version of this game. He was personable, friendly and a great host, the best!

I would love to see it revived anf FOX killed a good thing when allegedly they slated a 2nd season but an exec didn't like game shows. However, this wouldn't be the first time FOX killed or cancelled a great show (Alien Nation)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's Gone!
MustacheUmbrella11 February 2001
Winning lines, Twenty-one , Hollywood Showdown , Mall Masters are wan-a-be "Who wants to be a Millionaire game shows. Okay Greed also was a rip off but the show was good enough to stay. I liked the eliminator. I heard all about the hate mail received and the letters were awful. Roomers that the show was a fraud and no money was given. That was not true. That caused the ratings to drop and then eventually got pulled off the air for good. Somebody did something. Everyone I talked to found some interest in the show. One thing that did bother me was that they played it at the same time millionaire was on. Even on the same day "Thursdays at the time. But the show is gone now and they cant bring it back. Too bad. I was looking forward to it this year.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I'd have to see a shrink if I were on this show and lost 1 million dollars
DaBears5411 February 2004
It was a fun show but did you see some of those contestants that made it to 1 million and lost. Some of them wanted to kill each other after losing. I would of snapped if I was on that show and lost. Some of those captains on there were so damn petty because when some people want to quit the captain of the group still had the need for greed. I think thats why it got the axe. Someone was going to snap one day.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suffered from not being first out of the blocks in its genre.
jordan_ps256 November 2003
The big disadvantage that Greed had was because it was seen as a ripoff of "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?", the show that really started a trend of huge cash prizes in primetime. This crutch killed the show before it really began. Had it aired before Millionaire, it may have exacted a lot more success.

Otherwise the show had some potential. Five player teams got together with the hopes of earning up to two million dollars among themselves. Because questions had multiple answers (four answers out of six, seven, eight, or nine possible answers, et cetera) teams had to split the responsibility of answering.

However, in later rounds the team faced "The Terminator" which had the potential to challenge players, eliminate them from the game, and take their winnings in the process. It was an interesting format in which you had to have some reliance on your teammates, but could never get too close if you feel the desire to take more of the kitty for yourself.

Plus a great soundtrack which gives you the impression that your heart is beating louder than it ever has before as you edge along a terrifyingly tall cliff with a 70 MPH wind blowing against you.

Chuck Woolery may not have been the most appropriate host for the show, but he certainly did a decent job.

The one thing it couldn't do was survive in the face of other big-prize game shows...
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oh come on!!
hairsandwich2 February 2000
FOX has never really seemed to treat it's viewers as intelligent adults, hence the "animals attack" and "wild police video" series. And now we have.... Greed. And this show debuted right after the hubub over Who Wants to be a Millionaire?

Coincidence? I think not.

But in all fairness, in it's own sadistic way, Greed is actually an entertaining show! The whole "trust no one" air is fairly enthralling and the suspension that Chuck creates around the questions is sucessful in it's own way. Even though commercials run freely the higher on the tree the contestants get, the show is a fun waste of time. I found myself cheering in spite of myself when one team reached the $2,000,000 level.

It's just the scenes with the "Eliminator" that are hard to watch....
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Greed is bad
Jtalledo12 October 2001
"Greed" was Fox's blatant and pathetic attempt to capitalize on the success of ABC's primetime game show and breakout hit, "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?" And as far as trivia shows, it's about as trivial as they get. No one really cared about the show - even when it boasted the biggest amount of money won in gameshow history for a while (a record later surpassed by the remake of "21" which aired on NBC and PAX TV). This was probably because the format was decidedly stale - the game began with a bunch of players with one captain who decided if the team wanted to go further in the game to win more money.

Contestants could be eliminated in mini-segments that involved players taking on each other in a one-on-one session similar to the first round in a "Family Feud" match. Prize money was shared, as was the responsibility to provide answers to questions. Questions had multiple answers so each player had to provide an answer.

Speaking of questions, they were even more trivial than the show itself. In a behind-the-scenes segment on I believe the cable channel E!, they showed how the writers came up with the questions. They basically pulled out the most obscure facts they could find and made them into questions on the show. As a result, there were a load of questions on the show that NO ONE on Earth could come up with the answer to, which kills the all-important "playing at home" ability that keeps the TV audience hooked. I mean, no sane person knows the answer to questions like "What are the four most popular syrups at the International House of Pancakes?" (a real show question).

While "Greed" wasn't the most pathetic attempt to capitalize on the success of "Millionaire" (CBS's dismal "Winning Lines" from some "Millionaire" producers is in the running for that title), it sure wasn't a fun game show to watch. Its questions were so obscure; "Price is Right" was more of a trivia show than this. The game format was extremely stale and boring and the show's most redeeming feature, oddly was its host: Chuck Woolery, of "Love Connection".
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Um, yeah.
lildrchris2518 October 2004
OK, so it was a Millionaire rip-off. But enough of that. Woolery did a really good job hosting. Overall not a bad show, but there was one huge problem that stuck out. Why did they rely on polls and obscure facts for the upper 4 questions? Couldn't they come up with something that we might actually be able to guess? Like dates? As for the no safe haven thing on that show, it creates a scenario in which a person that took the terminator opportunity and was eliminated actually won more than the other contestants!

Too many flaws, otherwise not a bad show. Maybe a safe haven would have been something to consider, since the top 4 questions were ones that I don't think anyone would be able to get easily?
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed