"Great Performances" June Moon (TV Episode 1974) Poster

(TV Series)

(1974)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
George F. Kaufman's hate of musical comedy
theowinthrop28 October 2005
George F. Kaufman is probably the greatest collaborator dramatist in American theatrical history. Best recalled for his collaborations with Moss Hart (YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU; ONCE IN A LIFETIME; THE MAN WHO CAME TO DINNER), he also collaborated with Edna Ferber (STAGEDOOR), Morris Ryskind (THE COCONUTS), and with Ring Lardner on this play. But although he was involved in many plays that were actually musicals, Kaufman hated musicals. He felt they were unnatural - people suddenly breaking into songs that interfered with the flow of the narrative. The classic story of how this actually hurt his work is told about THE COCONUTS. Irving Berlin wrote the score, and most of the tunes are third rate Berlin, but he had a tune which Mary Eaton was to sing to Oscar Shaw in the show when he was arrested. It was "Always", which remains a standard to this day among Berlin's tunes. Berlin proudly played the melody for Kaufman, Ryskind, and the producers of the show.

Kaufman got bored, and when it was finished revealed how he felt about that song. He went to the piano and played the musical line for "I'll be loving you...always", but sang, "I'll be loving you Tuseday." After a few minutes of this, Berlin angrily took back the best tune he had composed for that show. He left such tunes as "When My Dream Comes True" and "The Monkey - Doodle - Doo" in, which are only recalled now because the film is still a living comedy due to the Marx Brothers.

Kaufman probably never cared (the show was, after all, a success without "Always"). However, when he wrote JUNE MOON with Ring Lardner, he aimed at Tin Pan Alley the shafts he always felt it deserved. For example, the big hit (so far) in the career of Jack Cassidy's / Paul Sears' is a ditty called, "Paprika, Paprika, The Spice of My Life." Hardly a great sounding tune. Cassidy's character has had a long dry spell since that success. He has found a new partner in Tom Fitzsimmons (Fred Stevens) who seems gifted to put Cassidy's words to music.

The play has not really dated, but in this production the more serious side of the comedy took over. Basically Cassidy and Stevens are being undermined by Cassidy's wife (Susan Sarandon - playing a good villain role for a change) and her sister, who see the newly successful team as good to milk for every cent they can get. Both men eventually do realize they are being used, but it takes awhile for this to happen.

Kevin McCarthy plays the head of the music publishing company - he only has one good scene though. Stephen Sondheim plays a cynical piano player who helps straighten out the boys about the women they have been tied to. Estelle Parsons and Austin Pendleton also add to the cast. But it is Cassidy whom I find most interesting as the betrayed Paul. His increasing suspicions are touching, as he realizes something is wrong but he can't quite grasp it. It shows that doomed acting talent in another light, quite different from his appearance in THE ANDERSONVILLE TRIAL, where he was not so naive or trusting for so long. He was a very gifted actor who died too soon.

For all the positives in the play I'll give it a "6". As I like Broadway musicals (unlike Kaufman) I can't give it anymore than that.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very Interesting!
bestactor1 January 2004
This is not an especially significant or compelling play but it's worth a look to see this gifted cast perform. Especially interesting is Stephen Sondheim's substantial contribution. His role is much larger and pivotal than I had expected.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lame, but interesting
Dword1 November 2000
Perhaps in the wake of "The Boy Friend", this revival of Twenties fluff seemed a good idea, but the material is thin and rather embarrassing. However, it is great fun to see some great actors before fame had swept them up. There is Susan Sarandon, Estelle Parsons, Jack Cassidy, and most interesting, there is Stephen Sondheim serving as a piano-tickling narrator, crooning his observations laconically.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
TV Version Makes Interesting Comparison with 1931 Film
lchadbou-326-265926 August 2018
Unlike some of the other contributors on this site,I prefer this 1974 Great Performances adaptation of the popular Kaufman and Lardner comedy (their only collaboration) to the rarely shown Paramount version from 1931.The latter was indeed closer to the Zeitgeist of the 1929 spoof of Tin Pan Alley,but the film adaptation made significant revisions to the original text.Besides being a more faithful transposition of what is admittedly now rather lightweight and dated material,the TV show offers some outstanding acting jobs.Little known juvenile Tom Fitzsimmons nails the part of the gullible,naive rube from upstate NY prone to malapropism and brings out the charm of the character.In a smaller role as the wisecracking but sympathetic piano player Maxie, Stephen Sondheim gives a memorable rendition which makes one wish he had acted more frequently.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Nice Try, But.....
tonstant viewer11 July 2005
The cast is as good as one could hope to assemble in 1974. In this DVD, a lot of really talented people demonstrate once again that it is not possible for contemporary actors to get it right in revivals of comedy of the 20s and 3os. Either the characters are made too real, in which case they're sunk by acting out of Freud and the Method, or they're brittle caricatures seen from outside and above, in which case we don't care about the characters and the wisecracks just lay there. The right tone is never struck, not ever.

If the 1931 film ever comes your way, try to see it. The text may have been corrupted by Paramount's writing staff, but the performing style is right, and we don't seem able to do that any more.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed