There is a trend of recent - one of some bewilderment that; raises some concern for the "documentary format" in general and is, to say the least, irritating.
Apparently it is OK to: Have some crackpot idea that needs validating. Trying to confirm this theory and when there is no proof that any of it has any validity whatsoever - go ahead and make a documentary anyhow. Not only that but then drag it out over several episodes while leading on that there is some kind of reveal coming up.
There is apparently a "mad man" at work here and, judging by what this documentary presents,it is not obvious who it is. This is a train wreck of a documentary - at least with regard to the topic is supposedly covering. If you, on the off chance, are interested of a glimpse into the mind of its maker, John Mork, you may consider this a treat.
Apparently it is OK to: Have some crackpot idea that needs validating. Trying to confirm this theory and when there is no proof that any of it has any validity whatsoever - go ahead and make a documentary anyhow. Not only that but then drag it out over several episodes while leading on that there is some kind of reveal coming up.
There is apparently a "mad man" at work here and, judging by what this documentary presents,it is not obvious who it is. This is a train wreck of a documentary - at least with regard to the topic is supposedly covering. If you, on the off chance, are interested of a glimpse into the mind of its maker, John Mork, you may consider this a treat.