Well done and worth watching, definitely contains merit and is presented in a fair manner - - so as always I have to comment on how, in the case of documentaries, the metric of review is significantly different than in a film for entertainment, right? Cause one (the reviewer) must decide if they're gonna to be critical of the subject matter or, rather, the technical aspects of the film - ie it may be a worthwhile topic (although to be fair this is entirely subjective and I guess the documentarian can't be faulted for what they feel is worthy or what they want to explore?!) but be presented very poorly and vica versa - in short, in the case of this film BOTH are worthwhile, but I'm reviewing more the film as a whole.
