This movie was.....not good, it is one of those movies that is not good at all, but that is very fun and very entertaining.
Pros: 1. The graphics are good.
2. Entertaining, dark and thrilling.
3. A fun movie.
4. Somewhat satisfying ending.
5. Liam Neeson is the one magnificent actor in this movie.
Cons: 1. There are far too many cuts, you can barely understand.
2. Very unnecessary, nobody needed or even wanted this movie.
3. It is significantly inferior to the first two movies.
4. Other than Liam Neeson, the acting....feels like acting. Even Forest Whitaker was not great in this movie.
5. The soundtrack is terrible.
6. The plot is basic, everyone has seen it before.
7. The pacing is bad, very bad.
8. Low realism level, and basically complete nonsense.
Conclusion: Plot: 6.4/10
Acting: 7.0/10.
Characters: 5.0 (neutral opinion)
Emotional impact: 6.1/10
Entertainment value: 8.1/10
Directing: 4.8/10
Cinematography: 5.6/10
Realism: 4.3/10
Ending: 7.2/10.
Final rating: 60.5%
Of course it was bad, Taken 2 and Taken 3 are not even the same director as Taken 1.
Pros: 1. The graphics are good.
2. Entertaining, dark and thrilling.
3. A fun movie.
4. Somewhat satisfying ending.
5. Liam Neeson is the one magnificent actor in this movie.
Cons: 1. There are far too many cuts, you can barely understand.
2. Very unnecessary, nobody needed or even wanted this movie.
3. It is significantly inferior to the first two movies.
4. Other than Liam Neeson, the acting....feels like acting. Even Forest Whitaker was not great in this movie.
5. The soundtrack is terrible.
6. The plot is basic, everyone has seen it before.
7. The pacing is bad, very bad.
8. Low realism level, and basically complete nonsense.
Conclusion: Plot: 6.4/10
Acting: 7.0/10.
Characters: 5.0 (neutral opinion)
Emotional impact: 6.1/10
Entertainment value: 8.1/10
Directing: 4.8/10
Cinematography: 5.6/10
Realism: 4.3/10
Ending: 7.2/10.
Final rating: 60.5%
Of course it was bad, Taken 2 and Taken 3 are not even the same director as Taken 1.