The lack of originality in the title itself should give you a clue as to how this one turns out.
The titles of the people giving interviews and narratives on what happened are only shown rarely, leaving you confused.
They tell you that the accused is not as smart as 99% of everyone else in the UK, yet offers more insight than the so-called experts they call on to give opinions.
They do not even delve the slightest bit into Jill's inner circle of friends as being the perpetrator, including her creepy fiancée, who seems to have an opinion on everything but who killed Jill.
If you're an American watching this documentary, you have no clue who any of the legal experts / UK celebrities and shows like Crimewatch are, and offer no insight into why they matter, with the exception of Princess Diana, whom they throw in as if there is some kind of hook...Yet has nothing to do (other than her hairstyle) with the deceased.
Recommend watching a better, more well-thought out documentary about anything less mundane than this subject matter.
The titles of the people giving interviews and narratives on what happened are only shown rarely, leaving you confused.
They tell you that the accused is not as smart as 99% of everyone else in the UK, yet offers more insight than the so-called experts they call on to give opinions.
They do not even delve the slightest bit into Jill's inner circle of friends as being the perpetrator, including her creepy fiancée, who seems to have an opinion on everything but who killed Jill.
If you're an American watching this documentary, you have no clue who any of the legal experts / UK celebrities and shows like Crimewatch are, and offer no insight into why they matter, with the exception of Princess Diana, whom they throw in as if there is some kind of hook...Yet has nothing to do (other than her hairstyle) with the deceased.
Recommend watching a better, more well-thought out documentary about anything less mundane than this subject matter.