Considering this "piece of art" in a historical context I would just say, Monty Python did it better...
It would be better as a fantasy, because it is historically absolutely inaccurate. The choose of the interviewed historians are very poor, the flowing of the story is very hectic and not so understandable. According to another historical sources there are so much misunderstanding in this series.
Furthermore it contradicts itself so much ways, making unenjoyable not just as an educational series, but also as a fictional movie too.
This is also shameful, because it was possible to create such a meaningless and undemanding work, full of errors, from an era of Hungarian history that was actually very significant.
It would be better as a fantasy, because it is historically absolutely inaccurate. The choose of the interviewed historians are very poor, the flowing of the story is very hectic and not so understandable. According to another historical sources there are so much misunderstanding in this series.
Furthermore it contradicts itself so much ways, making unenjoyable not just as an educational series, but also as a fictional movie too.
This is also shameful, because it was possible to create such a meaningless and undemanding work, full of errors, from an era of Hungarian history that was actually very significant.