This movie was the perfect length at 1:29:44 runtime. They did a great job at being an hour and a half long.
I respect the bravery of filming apocalypse snow scenes in what appeared to be summer in CA with a blue filter on top.
I admire the movie for unabashedly taking on a viral pandemic apocalypse and a winter storm apocalypse at the same time. A few years ago it would have been called unbelievable. Today, it's actually pretty much what I see on the headlines. Is this movie prophetic?
The budgeting choices were ruthless. It seems there was no money for special effects, but also no money for makeup, wardrobe, or believable dialog. Or ice, this ice apocalypse was often suspiciously devoid of any ice. I think maybe all the money went to hair, and some of the background music. Tough decisions were made and I respect that.
The scientific premise for why the world was ending (something about fires and glaciers and no salt in the water) was believable to me. But it should be noted I don't know anything about climate science. Maybe I do now.
I respect the bravery of filming apocalypse snow scenes in what appeared to be summer in CA with a blue filter on top.
I admire the movie for unabashedly taking on a viral pandemic apocalypse and a winter storm apocalypse at the same time. A few years ago it would have been called unbelievable. Today, it's actually pretty much what I see on the headlines. Is this movie prophetic?
The budgeting choices were ruthless. It seems there was no money for special effects, but also no money for makeup, wardrobe, or believable dialog. Or ice, this ice apocalypse was often suspiciously devoid of any ice. I think maybe all the money went to hair, and some of the background music. Tough decisions were made and I respect that.
The scientific premise for why the world was ending (something about fires and glaciers and no salt in the water) was believable to me. But it should be noted I don't know anything about climate science. Maybe I do now.