I see a lot of reviews on here that have reviewed this based on their feelings of the subjects/interviewer and not based on the actual content. This is an interesting documentary. Is the subject super creepy and narcissistic? Yes! You are watching a documentary on a voyeur, a dude that watched people thru the vents at his motel. What did you expect? "This is not a documentary, it's based on he said she said". This is absolutely a documentary, it follows the process of an author writing an article for the New Yorker. The New Yorker picked this up, one of the most well respected magazines out there. If they did a story on it why is it unworthy of a documentary? It doesn't make sense to me why people come on here to make reviews based on their feelings of the people in the documentary and not based on how interesting the movie actually is. There are twists, it's an interesting (screwed up) topic and it kept me entertained while watching it. If this topic makes you too uncomfortable, don't watch it. It made me uncomfortable but not to the point that I'm going to review it poorly and potentially ruin someone's chance to see it. 6.5-7/10. Rounding up because people in their feelings are reviewing it poorly.
