To quote the journal Economic Times: "Scientists have categorized almost all of Hancock's "scientific thesis" as pseudoscientific, and archaeologists have termed his works "examples of pseudohistory and pseudoarchaeology." Media sources suggest that none of Hancock's research articles was peer-reviewed."
The cinematography is beautiful but it's a shame that academically rigorous archaeologists were not featured. If they had been the public could learn something that is supported by evidence rather than be misled into believing a fantasy dreamed up by the narrator and promoted by Mr Rogan who loves a good story more than the messy and difficult truth.
Review of Ancient Apocalypse
