Well the prosecutions evidence was completely credible. Now the defenses rebuttals were quite, well let's just say bad to nonsense. Nothing irks me more than a botched police investigation and Crooked prosecution as in the West Memphis Three tradegy. The stabbing by the prosecution witness was way more reasonable then the defenses garbage reenactment. Oh the whole sock issue the defense acts incredulous lol. 75 yards is not far at all. I can throw a football 75 yards. It would take less than a minute and half at a slow jog to go 75 yards and back. You have that idiot Cruz woman saying the prosecution is trying to put a square peg in a round hole. I think its the other way around sweety. That is not far at all. Reference the knife that cut the screen. The defense only answers is cross contamination must have occurred. Which they didn't even attempt to prove. Then that idiot Davis Psychologist says he's never seen anyone hurt themselves that bad faking a crime. That is total nonsense. Complete nonsense. The wound on the arm should've been more on the outside of the forearm. It was where it was, cause she could stab herself easier. Also her wound on the neck was superficial compared to her kids. Problem is she almost screwed up. This mysterious stranger mustve been a genius. Lol Then these idiots want to rag on the Nurses for telling the truth of what they witnessed. The only thing Routier has going for her is the fact that it's hard to believe a Mother would do that to her Children. But her appellate attorney and experts are bought off goofs.
Review of The Last Defense
