What's happened to British film making?? Bad, Woden acting and unnecessary graphic sex scenes does not a good film make. I've never seen the actor playing the lead before - I hope I never do again. He was so wooden, flat and boring.
The film is too long and the first few scenes are of graphic sex - here's an idea, maybe if they cut the sex scenes, or the scene with the woman in her undies standing at a window fondling herself (what was the point of that?) - or the scene when the wooden actor P. I. has a massage and the wooden actress playing the masseuse tells him a tale of her 'visions'. Had she not been so wooden and boring we may have taken note of what she was saying (she was obviously given the role not for her acting but for two other reasons). When he started pulling down the zip of her coat, exposing her breasts, we both decided that the sex scenes were too much - were we watching a carry on film? We wondered why the information she gave couldn't have been done over a telephone call, thus cutting some of this crap film. Oh but then there wouldn't be the exposing of breasts would there? Silly me.
It was obvious to all of us who the cut up body was in the photos!
The wooden acting, the long drawn out story, the unnecessary graphic scenes made this is a cringeworthy load of crap. NB: a few recognisable British actors, but we all agreed that they'd all lost their acting skills while working on this 'film'. Poor, poor, poor.
The film is too long and the first few scenes are of graphic sex - here's an idea, maybe if they cut the sex scenes, or the scene with the woman in her undies standing at a window fondling herself (what was the point of that?) - or the scene when the wooden actor P. I. has a massage and the wooden actress playing the masseuse tells him a tale of her 'visions'. Had she not been so wooden and boring we may have taken note of what she was saying (she was obviously given the role not for her acting but for two other reasons). When he started pulling down the zip of her coat, exposing her breasts, we both decided that the sex scenes were too much - were we watching a carry on film? We wondered why the information she gave couldn't have been done over a telephone call, thus cutting some of this crap film. Oh but then there wouldn't be the exposing of breasts would there? Silly me.
It was obvious to all of us who the cut up body was in the photos!
The wooden acting, the long drawn out story, the unnecessary graphic scenes made this is a cringeworthy load of crap. NB: a few recognisable British actors, but we all agreed that they'd all lost their acting skills while working on this 'film'. Poor, poor, poor.