I am not one of those complaining all the time if a sentence from a book is missing in a film. In fact I was not even aware what the story of the written novel was. But the story of the film adaptation is so bad that I simply couldn't believe that Agatha Christie wrote it. So I checked synopsis of the novel and I suggest everyone to do the same.
They are completely different. The actual written story sounds interesting and would make a much better film. Instead we get this completely unbelievable story with some of the worst last 5 minutes of the series.
What bank would entrust so much money to a gambling addict? His fiancée stole the key and what happens to her? Nothing. He gambles whole nights on the most important journey of his career and as a punishment he... gets promoted?! Somehow his promotion also solves the gambling addiction. Look at that happy couple, how cute...
This episode is insulting my grey cells.
They are completely different. The actual written story sounds interesting and would make a much better film. Instead we get this completely unbelievable story with some of the worst last 5 minutes of the series.
What bank would entrust so much money to a gambling addict? His fiancée stole the key and what happens to her? Nothing. He gambles whole nights on the most important journey of his career and as a punishment he... gets promoted?! Somehow his promotion also solves the gambling addiction. Look at that happy couple, how cute...
This episode is insulting my grey cells.