More or less all of this film is pure fiction.
Slapping a "Ted Bundy" title on a film is easy, but if you have absolutely no intention of telling a story that remotely resembles the actual event, except from that he was a killer, you only do this for your own game.
And what that has actually been told from the truth is so far from what happened. Location-wise, and actions. Why?
There is also NO likeness between the actor and Bundy.
So again, WHY!?
And the female cop has no place in this story. Who is she in real life?
There has been two good Bundy-films the last couple of years. The Joe Berlinger one, and the latest, "No man of god".
This film has absolutely NO connect with Ted Bundy, or his crimes.
The director likes to make films about real crimes, and some are actually decent. THIS is not one of them.
I just don't see ANY reason for making a film about true crime if you don't want to use real facts, or try to make it look like what it was when it happened.
Slapping a "Ted Bundy" title on a film is easy, but if you have absolutely no intention of telling a story that remotely resembles the actual event, except from that he was a killer, you only do this for your own game.
And what that has actually been told from the truth is so far from what happened. Location-wise, and actions. Why?
There is also NO likeness between the actor and Bundy.
So again, WHY!?
And the female cop has no place in this story. Who is she in real life?
There has been two good Bundy-films the last couple of years. The Joe Berlinger one, and the latest, "No man of god".
This film has absolutely NO connect with Ted Bundy, or his crimes.
The director likes to make films about real crimes, and some are actually decent. THIS is not one of them.
I just don't see ANY reason for making a film about true crime if you don't want to use real facts, or try to make it look like what it was when it happened.