More enjoyable and eventful than the previous episode, at least. I'm glad Geralt got focused on more with a little bit, but enough, of Yennefer, and very little of Ciri. I feel like Ciri's parts have been the least interesting to watch (but still necessary, I imagine), so I'm glad there isn't THAT much of her, yet.
According to a particular comment that I've read, each timeline starts becoming intertwined in or after the fourth episode. That should make things more enjoyable without requiring you to mentally wear yourself out trying to keep up with the "when" in a general sense of all three timelines combined while at the same time, trying to follow along with everything else, what's happening at the moment for the audience.
That being said, I do have a question. As far as the premiere up to this episode is concerned, Yennefer's storyline is in the past, Geralt's storyline is in the present, and Ciri's storyline is in the future, right? Or is Geralt's storyline in the present for us, the audience, but Ciri's storyline is/will be the present after each timeline is connected? That's two questions, oops.
According to a particular comment that I've read, each timeline starts becoming intertwined in or after the fourth episode. That should make things more enjoyable without requiring you to mentally wear yourself out trying to keep up with the "when" in a general sense of all three timelines combined while at the same time, trying to follow along with everything else, what's happening at the moment for the audience.
That being said, I do have a question. As far as the premiere up to this episode is concerned, Yennefer's storyline is in the past, Geralt's storyline is in the present, and Ciri's storyline is in the future, right? Or is Geralt's storyline in the present for us, the audience, but Ciri's storyline is/will be the present after each timeline is connected? That's two questions, oops.