"Sarafina!"
"Bopha!"
"Cry Freedom"
"A Dry White Season"
"Mandela and de Klerk"
All Apartheid based movies I watched that took place in South Africa during Apartheid. "Red Dust" is the first post-Apartheid movie I've watched, and it was just as difficult to watch as the others. Movies, such as the aforementioned, I can only watch every so often because I need time afterwards to decompress, cool down, and sort out my feelings. There's always a lot of anger, but with that anger are so many other emotions that I can't properly express how I'm feeling after watching a movie such as "Red Dust."
Apparently, after Apartheid was abolished as a system, South Africa created a Truth and Reconciliation Commission by which the white Boers could truthfully confess their crimes and get amnesty (i.e. avoid punishment for their crimes). This was done as a means for the country to move forward pass their sordid history. The amnesty claims could be refuted by witnesses or victims of the claimant's crime.
Dirk Hendricks (Jamie Bartlett) wanted amnesty, so he decided to come forward about the torture of Alex Mpondo (Chiwetel Ejiofor). Alex had no intention of confronting Hendricks or even opposing his claim except that he wanted the whereabouts of his friend Steve Sizela (Loyiso Gxwala) to be made public. Alex and Steve were tortured together, and Steve was never seen again. Whether or not Hendricks was granted amnesty, Alex wanted it to be known what happened to Steve Sizela.
Representing Alex was Sarah Barcant (Hilary Swank), a South African now living in New York. She was a lawyer who only came back at the behest of an old friend named Ben Hoffman (Marius Weyers). She and her mother were victimized by the racist Apartheid system so she fled South Africa years ago and had no intentions of ever returning.
Predictably, the movie was tense and emotional. There's just no way to lightly deal with terrible tragedies such as torture and murder, nor should it be dealt with lightly. I'd never heard about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and after watching this movie I'm not sure how I feel about it.
In the end Hendricks implicated a man named Piet Muller (Ian Roberts) as the murderer of Steve Sizela. When Piet was brought to trial for that murder, he pled not guilty while also filing for amnesty, which would allow the crime to go unpunished. The Black South Africans in the galley erupted in anger at the amnesty claim as any victim would.
I'm sharing the events of that scene as a preface for what happened a little later. After this news Sarah paid a visit to her old friend Ben to say goodbye. Ben intimated that Mullar needed amnesty to which Sarah replied, "So he can get off the hook like Hendricks?"
Ben then asked, " How will punishing Hendricks bring Sizela back?"
And that's when I wanted to vomit.
It is such lame pea-brained logic. By that logic, no one should be punished for any crime they commit because how can punishing a criminal restore a life, restore property, or remove the physical or psychological harm done to a person? Tell me. If a person rapes, tortures, or kills, how would punishing him ever erase the rape, erase the torture, or bring the killed person back to life? Of course, it can't, yet we punish wrongdoers anyway out of a sense of justice. In other words, you will not be allowed to harm others and simply say I'm sorry as a means of atonement. You will not be allowed to wrong others and say, "It's water under the bridge." There has to be punishment for the victims to feel any semblance of peace and closure. There has to be punishment to prevent people from taking matters into their own hands. So, the decrepit argument of "it won't bring them back" rings hollow to me.
Does that mean that I'm not for amnesty based upon the Truth and Reconciliation Commission? It's not my cause, it's not my fight, it's not my country. It is a way forward in which the bad actors have to publicly state to the world what they did. If the South Africans want that for their healing process, who am I to judge?
"Bopha!"
"Cry Freedom"
"A Dry White Season"
"Mandela and de Klerk"
All Apartheid based movies I watched that took place in South Africa during Apartheid. "Red Dust" is the first post-Apartheid movie I've watched, and it was just as difficult to watch as the others. Movies, such as the aforementioned, I can only watch every so often because I need time afterwards to decompress, cool down, and sort out my feelings. There's always a lot of anger, but with that anger are so many other emotions that I can't properly express how I'm feeling after watching a movie such as "Red Dust."
Apparently, after Apartheid was abolished as a system, South Africa created a Truth and Reconciliation Commission by which the white Boers could truthfully confess their crimes and get amnesty (i.e. avoid punishment for their crimes). This was done as a means for the country to move forward pass their sordid history. The amnesty claims could be refuted by witnesses or victims of the claimant's crime.
Dirk Hendricks (Jamie Bartlett) wanted amnesty, so he decided to come forward about the torture of Alex Mpondo (Chiwetel Ejiofor). Alex had no intention of confronting Hendricks or even opposing his claim except that he wanted the whereabouts of his friend Steve Sizela (Loyiso Gxwala) to be made public. Alex and Steve were tortured together, and Steve was never seen again. Whether or not Hendricks was granted amnesty, Alex wanted it to be known what happened to Steve Sizela.
Representing Alex was Sarah Barcant (Hilary Swank), a South African now living in New York. She was a lawyer who only came back at the behest of an old friend named Ben Hoffman (Marius Weyers). She and her mother were victimized by the racist Apartheid system so she fled South Africa years ago and had no intentions of ever returning.
Predictably, the movie was tense and emotional. There's just no way to lightly deal with terrible tragedies such as torture and murder, nor should it be dealt with lightly. I'd never heard about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and after watching this movie I'm not sure how I feel about it.
In the end Hendricks implicated a man named Piet Muller (Ian Roberts) as the murderer of Steve Sizela. When Piet was brought to trial for that murder, he pled not guilty while also filing for amnesty, which would allow the crime to go unpunished. The Black South Africans in the galley erupted in anger at the amnesty claim as any victim would.
I'm sharing the events of that scene as a preface for what happened a little later. After this news Sarah paid a visit to her old friend Ben to say goodbye. Ben intimated that Mullar needed amnesty to which Sarah replied, "So he can get off the hook like Hendricks?"
Ben then asked, " How will punishing Hendricks bring Sizela back?"
And that's when I wanted to vomit.
It is such lame pea-brained logic. By that logic, no one should be punished for any crime they commit because how can punishing a criminal restore a life, restore property, or remove the physical or psychological harm done to a person? Tell me. If a person rapes, tortures, or kills, how would punishing him ever erase the rape, erase the torture, or bring the killed person back to life? Of course, it can't, yet we punish wrongdoers anyway out of a sense of justice. In other words, you will not be allowed to harm others and simply say I'm sorry as a means of atonement. You will not be allowed to wrong others and say, "It's water under the bridge." There has to be punishment for the victims to feel any semblance of peace and closure. There has to be punishment to prevent people from taking matters into their own hands. So, the decrepit argument of "it won't bring them back" rings hollow to me.
Does that mean that I'm not for amnesty based upon the Truth and Reconciliation Commission? It's not my cause, it's not my fight, it's not my country. It is a way forward in which the bad actors have to publicly state to the world what they did. If the South Africans want that for their healing process, who am I to judge?