Went into this expecting to be let down after some of the reviews. I found it far more interesting than expected.
It felt to me a lot more about motivations, fears, attitudes and trust than about sex. Yes there's some glimpses of sex play - that is necessary though, as it forces the other reactions.
It makes you think about your own reactions as well, whether you as the viewer are gay or straight. Do we judge the actors who are involved directly in the sex different to those who aren't? Do we view the gay actors in the project as lesser than the straight actors? Do we still respect those involved in the project or are they in some way artistically devalued. And why is a bit of pleasure between 2 (or more) people seen as worse than all the violence seen on screen in film and TV. Can it still have artistic merit as part of telling a story.
The longest scene featuring sex is outside of the bar, a frankly lovely scene between a real couple. Framed against the discomfort of the lead character (played by Val Lauren), and his fears of how it would affect him, his friendships and relationships, and his own standing as an actor.
One thing to remember is the era when Cruising itself was made. Also the fact the film was received very much as an anti-gay statement as it depicted Pacino as entering some kind of dark underworld of dirty sex (and murder). From the reactions from one of the leads friends in a series of phone calls, you can see that attitude to sex, in particular full-on gay sex, has not totally gone away. Also the fears of the affect on an actor's career.
The only thing that stopped me giving this a 9 is it needed an extra maybe 20 minutes after filming and editing, to explore how people felt after taking part, how James Franco felt, was the project a success and did it achieve what he wanted. However I definitely recommend.
It felt to me a lot more about motivations, fears, attitudes and trust than about sex. Yes there's some glimpses of sex play - that is necessary though, as it forces the other reactions.
It makes you think about your own reactions as well, whether you as the viewer are gay or straight. Do we judge the actors who are involved directly in the sex different to those who aren't? Do we view the gay actors in the project as lesser than the straight actors? Do we still respect those involved in the project or are they in some way artistically devalued. And why is a bit of pleasure between 2 (or more) people seen as worse than all the violence seen on screen in film and TV. Can it still have artistic merit as part of telling a story.
The longest scene featuring sex is outside of the bar, a frankly lovely scene between a real couple. Framed against the discomfort of the lead character (played by Val Lauren), and his fears of how it would affect him, his friendships and relationships, and his own standing as an actor.
One thing to remember is the era when Cruising itself was made. Also the fact the film was received very much as an anti-gay statement as it depicted Pacino as entering some kind of dark underworld of dirty sex (and murder). From the reactions from one of the leads friends in a series of phone calls, you can see that attitude to sex, in particular full-on gay sex, has not totally gone away. Also the fears of the affect on an actor's career.
The only thing that stopped me giving this a 9 is it needed an extra maybe 20 minutes after filming and editing, to explore how people felt after taking part, how James Franco felt, was the project a success and did it achieve what he wanted. However I definitely recommend.