It seems all too common these days that only one point of view is portrayed, whether it be the media or this documentary (and the book it was based on). In this documentary you get opinions from both genders, multiple races and different languages but they all speak the same voice, there are no alternative view points whatsoever. That one view point is tax the rich more and essentially get rid of inheritance. Arguably offshore companies and tax avoidance is a big issue, however, taking peoples wealth and not giving people the choice what they do with it when they die, well, many disagree with some or all these sentiments. That's my point, where were those voices?
For people that aren't aspirational and are bitter that some have more than they do, they may enjoy this documentary. For any critical thinkers, they'll see this documentary as a poor effort. For a more balanced and forensic documentary on capital, give The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson a go.
For people that aren't aspirational and are bitter that some have more than they do, they may enjoy this documentary. For any critical thinkers, they'll see this documentary as a poor effort. For a more balanced and forensic documentary on capital, give The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson a go.