Structurally, this doco looks good, but is needlessly fragmented as if it's intentionally edited in an effort to be "innovative" or clever.
In terms of content, wow. I am familiar with the events and some of the persons involved, and of the nature of the accusations leveled herein. They're not anything close to reasonably supported by evidence. You either "believe in" them, or you won't, but mostly you'll probably say "doesn't sound right to me, but who the hell really knows." The so called evidence presented here, isn't much better than the evidence of the JFK assassination conspiracies.
Just remember, the main guy asserting the claims, is a former disgruntled employee of the organization he worked for.
In terms of content, wow. I am familiar with the events and some of the persons involved, and of the nature of the accusations leveled herein. They're not anything close to reasonably supported by evidence. You either "believe in" them, or you won't, but mostly you'll probably say "doesn't sound right to me, but who the hell really knows." The so called evidence presented here, isn't much better than the evidence of the JFK assassination conspiracies.
Just remember, the main guy asserting the claims, is a former disgruntled employee of the organization he worked for.