King Charles III (2017 TV Movie)
10/10
Tim Pigott-Smith Should Get Knighthood At Least!
15 February 2019
The drama first appeared on stage in London, England and later on Broadway in New York City. It was overshadowed by other productions for the Tony Awards. I would have liked to have seen this production though. Tim Pigott-Smith should be awarded Knighthood and Prince Charles should be the officiant during the investiture ceremony at Buckingham Palace. Pigot-Smith's performance as Prince Charles is sympathetic, multi-layered and in-depth perhaps the best performance in his lifetime. Pigott-Smith does a terrific job in every scene as the long awaited heir to the British throne. Margot Leicester also does a terrific job as his second wife, Camilla, who supports her husband. Princes William and Harry don't fare well at all. This play has become Shakespearean with Kate as Lady Macbeth; William as Macbeth or one of King Lear's Goneril or Reagan and Harry the spare who wants love and life away from the palace. Charles is very much like King Lear here. Although only in 90 minutes, this film packs a true punch in the British psyche of the events surrounding the loss of the Queen and the monarchy. I know that the events are unlikely to enfold. Charles will be king even for a short time. When the time is right, it will be William and Kate's turn. As for the turmoil in Britain, brexit has a lot to do with it. The monarch's powers are limited and the prime minister only consults with the king or queen. The monarch are just figureheads. If only they could stop brexit, then they would show their true power.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed