Ignores The Testimony of One of It's Star Witnesses.
This is yet another Warren Commission apologist con job and I'm disappointed National Geographic gave this thing any credence. What you have is this Max Holland person bending over backwards and reverse engineering to 'prove' only three shots were fired and all shots came from the sixth floor of the Texas Book Depository building. In doing so he ignores the testimony of one of his star witnesses, Amos Euins who was a 15 year old, in Dealey Plaza and clearly saw Oswald in the window. Euins says in Holland's video the bullets came like this 'Bam... bam-bam' indicating bullets two and three came right on top of each other. This would've made it impossible for both shots to have come from Oswald's bolt action rifle. Holland doesn't take this into consideration AT ALL.
Doing a little research on Max Holland you find that he has been pushing theories that have been rendered bogus by declassified Assassination Records Review Board archives. Doing a little more research, on Amos Ueins initial Dallas Police Department affidavit you find Euins said he thought he heard FOUR shots, only saw Oswald shoot TWO and thought because of the rapidity of fire the gun was an automatic, not a bolt action rifle. He heard one shot then a delay and then three additional shots with the last two coming one right after the other. You can find a link to that affidavit by a search for 'Amos Euins i heard the shot history matters''.
Conveniently, Arlen Specter who deposed Euins for the Warren Commission never asked him about how many shots he heard or the timing between the shots. Yet another Warren Commission apologist put up job
This is yet another Warren Commission apologist con job and I'm disappointed National Geographic gave this thing any credence. What you have is this Max Holland person bending over backwards and reverse engineering to 'prove' only three shots were fired and all shots came from the sixth floor of the Texas Book Depository building. In doing so he ignores the testimony of one of his star witnesses, Amos Euins who was a 15 year old, in Dealey Plaza and clearly saw Oswald in the window. Euins says in Holland's video the bullets came like this 'Bam... bam-bam' indicating bullets two and three came right on top of each other. This would've made it impossible for both shots to have come from Oswald's bolt action rifle. Holland doesn't take this into consideration AT ALL.
Doing a little research on Max Holland you find that he has been pushing theories that have been rendered bogus by declassified Assassination Records Review Board archives. Doing a little more research, on Amos Ueins initial Dallas Police Department affidavit you find Euins said he thought he heard FOUR shots, only saw Oswald shoot TWO and thought because of the rapidity of fire the gun was an automatic, not a bolt action rifle. He heard one shot then a delay and then three additional shots with the last two coming one right after the other. You can find a link to that affidavit by a search for 'Amos Euins i heard the shot history matters''.
Conveniently, Arlen Specter who deposed Euins for the Warren Commission never asked him about how many shots he heard or the timing between the shots. Yet another Warren Commission apologist put up job