This updating of Oscar Wilde's Victorian-age novel, "The Picture of Dorian Gray," to the 1970s and translating of the English-language text to Italian is surprisingly faithful--more so in some ways than the classic 1945 MGM version, among others. I generally don't find faithfulness important for an adaptation, but in this case it's usually for the best. And, the ways in which it does diverge from Wilde are interesting, including all of the 1970s style. I also believe that this is the first screen version to be explicit about homosexuality, which, of course, even the book wasn't (although granted, chronologically, this is only the third Dorian Gray film I've found available after the 1945 one and a 1915 silent two-reeler).
Some of the film techniques employed leave much to be desired, including the abruptness of the opening prolepsis, and its point-of-view shots of bloody hands. Some of the sex scenes are too long as well, although they're not very explicit because the bodies are generally obscured by foreground objects. Consequently, some consider this trashy or a sexploitation film, but I don't necessarily agree. At least, it could've been a lot more risqué considering its source. Anyways, it's not the gorgeous piece of art that the MGM film remains. It does, however, have plenty of 1970s fashion and style and a groovy soundtrack. It also benefits from the most-appropriate-looking (as far as being blonde, blue-eyed, young and handsome) and probably best-looking Dorian to ever appear on screen, Helmut Berger. The removal of many of Wilde's epigrams, however, leaves an unusually dull Henry.
Unlike other versions, including the 1945 and 2009 ones, this film doesn't do away almost entirely with the details of Sybil Vance's Shakespearean acting. It keeps the reason that Dorian rejects her because of her poor performance, even though she still has sex with him, as in the other movies and as just about everyone else in this film does. It bothers me that other adaptations miss the self-reflexive implications and theme of artistic illusion of this plot point. Another thing I like here is that it doesn't add a second grand romance, who is either related to Basil or Henry, for Dorian. It's entirely unnecessary. The Gladys here is an actual character from the book who partly fits that bill, instead, as well as the host of other characters from Wilde whom Dorian shags here. One of these liaisons explains his wealth, as 1970s Dorian, apparently, must work unlike his 19th-century counterpart. Another is the source of his blackmail of Alan Campbell, which is unexplained in the novel. The Alan storyline also involves photography, which is better employed here than it was in the 2009 "Dorian Gray."
Most sensationally, however, is the scene where Dorian drops the soap in the shower and Henry picks it up, and there are a few more homosexual hookups besides that. Oddly, the two characters I thought were most coded as gay when reading the novel are straight here: Basil, who gushes over his feelings for Dorian's looks in the book and fears that his portrait will expose those feelings, is merely a painter for hire here; and the usual theory of Alan's blackmail in the book is that Dorian threatened to expose his homosexuality--a crime back then, for which the author Wilde would later be sentenced. Dorian, Henry and Gwendolyn, on other hand, all take part in this iteration. I'm also rather surprised by the lack of drugs for a 1970s low-budget, supposed exploitation film. Even Wilde had Dorian visit an opium den. Regardless, this remains the most daring Dorian Gray screen adaptation to that date, which benefited by its updating to the sexual revolution.
Some of the film techniques employed leave much to be desired, including the abruptness of the opening prolepsis, and its point-of-view shots of bloody hands. Some of the sex scenes are too long as well, although they're not very explicit because the bodies are generally obscured by foreground objects. Consequently, some consider this trashy or a sexploitation film, but I don't necessarily agree. At least, it could've been a lot more risqué considering its source. Anyways, it's not the gorgeous piece of art that the MGM film remains. It does, however, have plenty of 1970s fashion and style and a groovy soundtrack. It also benefits from the most-appropriate-looking (as far as being blonde, blue-eyed, young and handsome) and probably best-looking Dorian to ever appear on screen, Helmut Berger. The removal of many of Wilde's epigrams, however, leaves an unusually dull Henry.
Unlike other versions, including the 1945 and 2009 ones, this film doesn't do away almost entirely with the details of Sybil Vance's Shakespearean acting. It keeps the reason that Dorian rejects her because of her poor performance, even though she still has sex with him, as in the other movies and as just about everyone else in this film does. It bothers me that other adaptations miss the self-reflexive implications and theme of artistic illusion of this plot point. Another thing I like here is that it doesn't add a second grand romance, who is either related to Basil or Henry, for Dorian. It's entirely unnecessary. The Gladys here is an actual character from the book who partly fits that bill, instead, as well as the host of other characters from Wilde whom Dorian shags here. One of these liaisons explains his wealth, as 1970s Dorian, apparently, must work unlike his 19th-century counterpart. Another is the source of his blackmail of Alan Campbell, which is unexplained in the novel. The Alan storyline also involves photography, which is better employed here than it was in the 2009 "Dorian Gray."
Most sensationally, however, is the scene where Dorian drops the soap in the shower and Henry picks it up, and there are a few more homosexual hookups besides that. Oddly, the two characters I thought were most coded as gay when reading the novel are straight here: Basil, who gushes over his feelings for Dorian's looks in the book and fears that his portrait will expose those feelings, is merely a painter for hire here; and the usual theory of Alan's blackmail in the book is that Dorian threatened to expose his homosexuality--a crime back then, for which the author Wilde would later be sentenced. Dorian, Henry and Gwendolyn, on other hand, all take part in this iteration. I'm also rather surprised by the lack of drugs for a 1970s low-budget, supposed exploitation film. Even Wilde had Dorian visit an opium den. Regardless, this remains the most daring Dorian Gray screen adaptation to that date, which benefited by its updating to the sexual revolution.