I know this is a weird review, but bad technobabble can ruin good sci-fi. I don't know the technobabble it's not usually this bad, i mean i can tell that the things they say make no sense, but at least they don't sound ignorantly stupid of popular science.
Starting with the shards have "the potential energy to level a city"? well yeah, so does a fingernail going by the most famous evacuation of Physics, E = mc^2. I mean, why kind of sale point is that? "The answer is not in science is in Placebo?" errhm... placebo is a scientific concept, discovered by scientific review, i would expect a brilliant bioengineer like Caitlin Snow to know that much.
Also can you guys not say lobotomize? "reset the frontal cortex, melt your mind"? ok i guess...
And that's ignoring the gender constructivist comnent made, (constructivism dismisses evolution, cross cultural meta analysis.) it's only accepted by certain echo chambers within the humanities and hollywood, so please stop.
Starting with the shards have "the potential energy to level a city"? well yeah, so does a fingernail going by the most famous evacuation of Physics, E = mc^2. I mean, why kind of sale point is that? "The answer is not in science is in Placebo?" errhm... placebo is a scientific concept, discovered by scientific review, i would expect a brilliant bioengineer like Caitlin Snow to know that much.
Also can you guys not say lobotomize? "reset the frontal cortex, melt your mind"? ok i guess...
And that's ignoring the gender constructivist comnent made, (constructivism dismisses evolution, cross cultural meta analysis.) it's only accepted by certain echo chambers within the humanities and hollywood, so please stop.