King Charles III (2017 TV Movie)
1/10
Pretentious Yawnfest that will only impress complete nincompoops
6 June 2017
Totally wrong-footed republican attack. If you are going to portray the monarchy in such a light, there are better ways to undermine it...Like factually.

The name is enough for anyone with a clue not to bother.

Charles was on the record as saying he will take the name George VII should his mother not outlive him. Yes, that's right, it's not an automatic naming system... Which is probably good as the king who fought Hitler would've been King Bertie the 1st. That he took the name Charles was only decided in the last year of HM Queen Elizabeth's reign,

If they can't be bothered to even get the basics correct, why should we bother to watch? Absolutely pointless drivel.

If you believe in alternative facts, which over 40% of Americans apparently do now, you may find this riveting. Only issue is that people who watch fox news are going to have trouble following the pseudo Shakespearean language. I'm guessing it's not going to be a box office spectacular.

Why did scores of people think this was a useful way to spend their time? Seriously, I'd appreciate some insight on why people bother creating such trash. You couldn't boast/use it on a CV/show it to friends or family. Why bother?
15 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed