I'm sorry but I couldn't watch more than 30 minutes.
Who wrote and who approved this script? I'm guessing its some kind of 'lad' humour and perhaps they think this is elevated 'Benny Hill' but it makes Benny Hill look tasteful.
Did none of the humans who lent their name to this (Chris Evert or John McEnroe) read the script? or were they happy that anybody attempted a comedy about tennis?
I'd be the first to think 'mammas boys' are funny but how did you manage to make him so dull? It was an achievement.
Did nobody have the judgement to say 'the emperor has no clothes' and that this is a steaming pile of the worst writing.
All this summer there has been nothing zero zilch nada niente to see in the cinema because not a decent script to be had (save 'Homes'). Even the Jurassic Park reworking of the same script was more watchable (although I hated paying to watch a film I had already at home).
I'm better off watching a Ken Burns documentary than imagining there will be decent comedy / drama produced.
Who wrote and who approved this script? I'm guessing its some kind of 'lad' humour and perhaps they think this is elevated 'Benny Hill' but it makes Benny Hill look tasteful.
Did none of the humans who lent their name to this (Chris Evert or John McEnroe) read the script? or were they happy that anybody attempted a comedy about tennis?
I'd be the first to think 'mammas boys' are funny but how did you manage to make him so dull? It was an achievement.
Did nobody have the judgement to say 'the emperor has no clothes' and that this is a steaming pile of the worst writing.
All this summer there has been nothing zero zilch nada niente to see in the cinema because not a decent script to be had (save 'Homes'). Even the Jurassic Park reworking of the same script was more watchable (although I hated paying to watch a film I had already at home).
I'm better off watching a Ken Burns documentary than imagining there will be decent comedy / drama produced.