9/10
Monster Disgust and Scares without the Gore
13 May 2015
8.5 of 10. The joy of a good monster film, including flaunting seemingly bad grammar at critics, but without having to suspend disbelief. This fact-based film gets you inside of a very different, and very real, Hannibal Lecter that is too pure to eat others but no less psychotic.

For the filmmakers, opting to attempt to recreate the story and character rather than do a documentary, the challenge is how to create thrills, suspense, and mystery for relatively recent history. They opt to focus on the "monster" man along, to a lesser extent, his enablers and the odd youth/minors prison atmosphere of the UK.

There are a few choices that make the film less interesting than it could be. For example, the monster's earlier history is relived through non-linear memories, making it hard for those unfamiliar with the person and what happened, those who are the main target of the film, to piece together the context or the horror and injustice of what happened. The writer and director needed to assume more ignorance and lack of interest in the audience.

Nonetheless, you'll never look at someone talking to themselves again quite the same and it's far more entertaining than watching someone dump a bucket of their own urine over their head on a Web video, though equally disgusting.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed