5/10
Swinging from comedy to drama without a net.
28 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
There's a lot of seriousness amidst the comedy of the Broadway classic "Burlesque", and in its three movie versions, the plot was altered for various changes in structure. "Swing High, Swing Low" is a semi-musical with Fred MacMurray as a trumpet player who marries the pretty Carole Lombard but drifts apart from her as his career soars. Along the way, he meets Latin spitfire Dorothy Lamour who has no hesitation in going out of her own way to seduce MacMurray, leading to the conclusion Lombard believes to have MacMurray cheating on her with Lamour. She moves on to a potentially more loyal partner, but he's more than determined to get her back.

The film starts off amusingly with Lombard and pal Jean Dixon (not the famous psychic of the later day 1900's) working as beauty experts on a cruise ship and getting into trouble when they get distracted while working on someone's hair. What is distracting them? Crossing the Panama Canal, and MacMurray's wisecracks towards Lombard as he tries to get the perky Lombard to go out with him. Of course, she eventually agrees (sort of having no choice being dismissed from her job) and they end up working in a shady nightclub run by Cecil Cunningham. MacMurray leads the band with his trumpet and she sings, but he gets a big opportunity to go to the Big Apple and that's where the scheming Lamour takes advantage.

A great cast helps this sometimes slow-moving and somewhat overlong comedy up to being better than it would have been with less talented performers. In addition to Lombard, MacMurray, Dixon and Lamour, there's the always funny Ben Blue, a very young Anthony Quinn and an amusing Franklin Pangborn as the beauty shop boss on the steamship. In some ways, this reminded me a lot of "Young Man With a Horn", particularly one dramatic scene where MacMurray is desperately trying to pawn his trumpet to get some money. A lavish look provided by the excellent director Mitchell Leisen adds to giving the film some style. Unfortunately, it's missing the spark to be consistently enjoyable, lacking substance and much needed more music.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed