I think that Annette O'Toole should have gone after the murderer of her brother,killed him,and forced society to judge her vigilante murder vs. her brother's murder. But ,just my opinion,now Micheal McKean's lawyer is disgraced,maybe out of work and shunned by society.So,he decides to get back by hurting O'Toole's family and the farmer's family then confronts O'Toole before he kills himself.O'Toole is left without her family,suffers guilt for the farmer's death,and is unable to seek any vengeance against a dead McKean.She learns the price of vengeance is too high and she can be a vigilante target too.Besides I would like to see people, that support vigilante tactics, respond when others resort to the same tactics against their family or friends.Other movies show criminals stalking and terrorizing people to get back at them for things they did to the criminals.But,these actions are evil and unjust in the movie's viewpoint.
Review of Final Justice
