7/10
Franco Meets Blanco Again
10 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Although the 1964 Jess Franco offering "Dr. Orloff's Monster" is commonly thought of as a sequel to his classic film "The Awful Dr. Orloff," released two years earlier, it strikes this viewer as more of a remake than a continuation. Howard Vernon does not appear in "DOM" as Orloff, nor does his human-robot brother, Morpho. In the second film, Dr. Conrad Jekyll (the brother of Henry, perhaps?) learns how to turn his dead brother, Andros (who he had murdered for philandering with his wife, just as Orloff had done), into a human robot. He gleans this invaluable info from a dying scientist who looks a bit like Howard Vernon and who the viewer infers must be Orloff himself. Jekyll (played by Marcelo Arroita-Jauregui, an actor who makes his character as difficult to like as his own name is to pronounce!) then uses his brother-robot to do his dirty work; namely, slaying various women about town. In a scenario strikingly similar to the setup in the following year's Cybernauts episode of "The Avengers," he gives these women a necklace containing an ultrasonic device that Andros homes in on. ("The Avengers" substituted a pen.) But trouble looms for the bad doctor when his pretty niece, appealingly played by Agnes Spaak, drops by with her new beau for a Xmas visit.... Though plotwise very similar to the first Orloff outing, this "sequel" also has much in common with another Franco film that I recently saw, 1962's "The Sadistic Baron von Klaus." Both films take place in the fictitious Austrian town of Holfen, feature surprisingly imaginative direction by Franco as well as stunning B&W cinematography, center on the police investigation of the various homicides, showcase some truly outre music from Daniel White, utilize the same bizarre-looking castle, and, of course, star Hugo Blanco in the titular role. "DOM" ups the ante a bit by throwing in a few more musical numbers and more topless scenes, and also treats the viewer to such striking sequences as Jekyll's visit to an opium den and Andros' visit to the local cemetery. The picture as a whole looks terrific, is well acted and makes perfect sense, ultimately; what a difference between these early to mid-'60s Franco films and the rest of his humongous oeuvre (around 190 films, as of this date!)! Hard to believe that this artful piece of horror was done by the same man who later gave us "The Devil Came From Akasava"....
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed