I am rating this low mainly for the choice of footage which is of low quality rather than for it's "ugliness". This looks like bottom of the barrel dregs served as alleged entertainment. The poor quality video/film clips are from amateur home video footage , police tapes and other sources. Some footage is 18 years old (for example the state trooper and getting verbal abuse) and it looks even older (watch time indexes on police footage for that one).
Some of the footage is in poor taste and does fit "banned for television" labelling. I would not pay money for this. It should be re re-edited and 50% of the footage dumped, and then might be better product.
Some of the footage is in poor taste and does fit "banned for television" labelling. I would not pay money for this. It should be re re-edited and 50% of the footage dumped, and then might be better product.