QT is one of those few still able to use cinema as a toy; he uses this paradoxhe makes selfconscientious films that are meant as wry homage to flicks whose only merit came from their ingenuity and innocence. You can play at being Joyce, you can not play at being Homer. The films QT pastiches were charming firstly because of their genuine innocencethis is the main thing lost in QT's movies. A bard can not be primarily an _ironist. It takes ingenuity.
Are any of his movies serious in the least, or semi-serious, or straight? Are they parody, deconstruction?
I thought "Bill" will be a deconstruction, a parody; it is not.I enjoyed this.
Are any of his movies serious in the least, or semi-serious, or straight? Are they parody, deconstruction?
I thought "Bill" will be a deconstruction, a parody; it is not.I enjoyed this.