Cheerleader has no balls
26 July 2003
My God, where to start?

The premise of the movie was weak at best, and probably looked better on paper, anyway.

The movie is too silly to be drama, but not funny enough to be a comedy. I tried to view it as a satire, but in doing that, I was only overwhelmed by the over-the-top stereotypes. This would normally put it in the burlesque genre, but again, it did not fit, because it tried to be serious at times.

The girls were fairly neutral, but the guys were as close to imitating Richard Simmons as you can get without bursting into flames.

If this was pro-gay - then it failed miserably. Gays do not need this type of buffonic support.

There were a few interesting casting choices such as Richard Moll - with hair, and Dante Basco who I know from a few Wonder Years eps. RuPaul, as an ex-gay, worked for one or two scenes, but was generally weak.

The little costumes the guys wore, the self-spanking antics of the son of the reform school director...

Oh God, I have to stop now, I'm getting nauseous.

This is as bad as Lost and Delirious, but in a different way. At least they don't run around quoting Shakespeare.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed