(TV Series)

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good in parts
bosporan29 April 2022
A strong opening with Danny thwarting a store hold-up and getting an existential crisis as a reward. This storyline is intriguing and, hopefully, will have follow up consequences.

The primary plot, though, is ponderous, painfully predictable and presents a particle of pulpit polemic.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Definitely a negative pattern at CBS
CrimeDrama12 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Does CBS even use law enforcement/legal consultants on its crime dramas? I doubt I am the only one who noticed issues with the opening scene. From the moment the robber walks into the store, I knew Danny could take him. However, thanks to the CBS writers sacrificing believability for conflict and drama, she goes all-in on the five D's of firearm defense but only "hits" two of them before the attacker regains control and points the gun at Danny. Surprise, the gun just "clicks" when he tries to shoot her and THEN Danny succeeds with her defense and holds the man until police arrive. The second attempt was textbook. When you try to grab a gun from someone's hands, their grip just intensifies so you need to use that against them. Later, Danny describes the "click" as a misfire but it was actually a malfunction because the slide and magazine failed to load another bullet after the gun was fired during the struggle. Meanwhile, the robber doesn't seem to care what happens to him. He isn't wearing a baseball hat and doesn't even have his hoodie up. Either one seems like a no-brainer even if you have no plan and only want to rob money for more drugs. He definitely didn't plan to eliminate all witnesses. This is the first time the show has dove into Danny's personal life and all of it came from scratch, the near-death experience, drinking a lot, and the bartender who may have saved her from her demons. The trial case wasn't very interesting. In the end, it came down to Marissa's friend feeling guilty and wanting it all to go away. It was a pretty sad statement about expectations and relationships. Meanwhile, even though Dr. Bull having a strained lower back seemed irrelevant to the storyline, I liked how it played out as I can relate. Besides time, what works for me are heat, stretching and Ibuprofen.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It was rape.
robhendrikx7 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A female president of a company slept with one of her employees. He then sues her for sexual herassment. Bull's team claim it wasn't herassment/rape because she didn't know he was her employee and the sex was consensual. Now, had the genders been reversed the president would have been convicted for rape faster than you can snap your fingers. And the outcome should have been the same here.

Because it doesn't matter if the boss knows the partner is an employee. What matters is, as Marisa points out early in the episode, that the employee knows the partner is his boss. This unequal relationship makes consensus impossible. She initiates sex and he can't refuse for fear of losing his job. Ergo: rape!

By the way, I figured out that the president's husband was the person pulling the strings after about ten minutes, so it's pretty lame that it took a team of clever people more than half an hour.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed