Andy (1965) Poster

(1965)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Unjustly neglected
luciferjohnson27 April 2004
A very fine, forgotten movie that deserves a great deal better than the total obscurity that has shrouded it over the years. After being shown on late-night TV in the early Seventies, Andy just dropped out of sight. And that's a shame. This is really an outstanding movie, filmed on location in New York and featuring excellent performances, particularly by Alden in the lead role. This is what used to be called an "art" movie, receiving limited distribution but often far outclassing the movies of the era. In some respects this film was better than "Charly," the Cliff Robertson film that explored mental retardation several years later.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Little-seen Tale!
shepardjessica15 August 2004
I don't know anyone who has seen this wonderful film from 1965 starring Norman Alden as a mentally-challenged 40 year old living with his aging parents in New York City. He gives an incredible performance in a career where he usually portrayed stooges and tough guys. Zvee Scooler (the father) is also wonderful. The trials and tribulations of living this man's life in a rough city is played out beautifully. It's not sentimental or looking for easy tears.

An 8 out of 10 for sure. I don't believe it's on DVD or video which is really a shame. I guess I saw this on late-night TV years ago, but always remembered it since I saw Norman Alden filming a commercial in L.A. 30 years ago. I wish they made more films like this nowadays. It's too much to ask for in an American film.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
You've probably met Charley and Bill. Now meet Andy.
mark.waltz13 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A well intended but definitely a film of its time, this artsy drama deals with the title character (Norman Alden) whose elderly father wants to institutionalize him even though his very loving mother wants Andy at home. This shows Andy in his New York City neighborhood, dealing with so called normal society who react to him in different ways with some rather surprising.

With a mental capacity that has continuously changed names throughout history, it's no wonder that there's confusion about what is actually wrong with him. I'd be reluctant to be around someone who out out of the blue starts crowing loudly like an early morning rooster, and when he's mocked for it in a pub, it becomes clear that the so called normal society around him is probably far worse off mentally than he is.

That's a very disturbing scene, set in an Irish pub, and the drunken group of men are just awful to him after seemingly being his friend. This scene follows one with Ann Wedgeworth who is either making a pass or setting him up for rejection. Other encounters with people on the street shows a very unaccepting public, giving a very dark view of human nature. It was nice to see Judith Lowry ("Phyllis") pop up as a sweet old lady he meets briefly, one of the few lighthearted movies in this depressing film that is still an important one.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent little film!
vanwall9 July 2007
I caught this once on TV many years ago, and waited for a few years to see it again on TV, and the second viewing confirmed my original impression - a cast of unknowns, headed by Norman Alden, made a beautiful small film that should be released on DVD as soon as possible. Alden played mostly heavies in the films I'd seen him in before, and this was a revelation - he was totally believable and very expressive with his movements, something talented big men can do like no others. The script is almost hyper-realistic, with a good feel for natural language, depending on other characters interactions with Andy to advance each set piece in the film. All in all, a great little independent film.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mostly relevant today
DarrellN22 November 2003
Andy Chadakis is forty and mentally retarded. He lives with his elderly parents in a modest NYC apartment. This film is a two-day slice of his challenging life.

I can't say how realistic a portrayal this is since no one in my family is mentally retarded. But I do have a child with a mental disability, so I can empathize with two issues central to this film: lack of respect for the disabled and its effect on their self-esteem.

It seems the only people who appreciate Andy are children. As the film opens, a group of children are impressed when Andy dislodges a big board from the riverbank, and tosses it into the river. Later, Andy exchanges smiles through his window with a little girl in an adjoining apartment. This exchange ends abruptly when the girl's mother spots Andy and thereupon shutters the window.

Andy's father, Theo, resents the sacrifice he and his wife have paid for forty years to raise and care for Andy. He tells his wife Tessa `Andy costs us too much.' Tessa usually defends Andy, but even she sometimes loses faith in him.

Theo announces to his wife that it's time Andy should be committed to an asylum. Although Tessa reminds Theo that Andy is retarded not `crazy,' Theo intends to stick to his plan for the two of them to have a better life. Tessa responds `We're the only ones who love him. There is nothing wrong with Andy's mind.'

Andy's encounters outside this home are ugly. He is slighted, teased, used, robbed, and beaten. One of my favorite scenes is Andy's encounter with a blind beggar in the subway. I won't tell when happens, but it may be unique in the cinema.

I appreciated this film despite its mostly downbeat, episodic nature, and, for the most part, lack of plot and dramatic drive. However, I think there may be many `Andy's' (and `Andy's parents') in our society with comparable stories. It's important that we understand and respect them as fellow humans.

I reviewed this movie as part of a project at the Library of Congress. I've named the project FIFTY: 50 Notable Films Forgotten Within 50 Years. As best I can determine, this film, like the other forty-nine I've identified, has not been on video, telecast, or distributed in the U.S. since its original release. In my opinion, it is worthy of being made available again.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed