Watch it for free, never make the mistake to pay for this, because this movie is a incredibly cheap budget movie, with lighting settings so incredibly dark that I honestly couldnt even so how bad this movie was most of the time. Dark lighting settings are always a good way of trying to cover up a cheap decor. They succeeded at that, but the story and acting are just without any real drama or suspense.
I guess this director wanted to experiment with a movie that is showing Daniel Ratcliff in 1 single room ALL the time. Well, almost all of the time, since he is constantly flying a plane, in almost total darkness. But this 1 room experiment has been done before in "Locke", where a man was filmed contineously while he was driving a car. But "Locke" has got a terrific dynamic storyline, with great acting, while "Beast of Burden" is no beast at all, it isnt even a mouse, dramatically speaking.
This is an experimental low budget film, which flopped.
I guess this director wanted to experiment with a movie that is showing Daniel Ratcliff in 1 single room ALL the time. Well, almost all of the time, since he is constantly flying a plane, in almost total darkness. But this 1 room experiment has been done before in "Locke", where a man was filmed contineously while he was driving a car. But "Locke" has got a terrific dynamic storyline, with great acting, while "Beast of Burden" is no beast at all, it isnt even a mouse, dramatically speaking.
This is an experimental low budget film, which flopped.