Review of Raw

Raw (2016)
3/10
Lame soft-core fetish wish fulfillment
29 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Paints, biting and picking out pubes. Insert some of the most annoying panting sounds produced by mankind and give it a shake. Not too good shake, there needs to be some lumps and bumps, serve the product and call it a movie. This time its name was "Raw" in English and "Grave" in French. Grave because it dug itself a big one and Raw because it is not even a finished product. As we can agree, it needed two different titles.

The R18 and mature audience logos are there only for the nudity and "erotic" content that maybe turns on a painter, but not many more. This so called horror doesn't exists. It is like The Shining for that matter except even The Shining did a better job as a horror than this one.

I guess some critics liked this one because it is just the right amount of tedious and pseudo-artistic to please a person who hates themselves for watching all the blockbuster movies just to call them the same old sh#t and get a minimal pay check, but also contains nothing deep and complex so they can still understand the movie and call it symbolic, smart and claim that everyone who didn't like it didn't get it. Despite there being nothing to get.

I'd recommend watching this if a) you're looking for a new fetishes and tend to like slimy, or b) if you want to be a generic critic with bad taste and like something hipsters might like, or c) you want to hear the beast OST this has and witness the worst panting sound from any movie ever + hear 2 car horn honk 2 minutes straight and realize it is nowhere near the most annoying thing in this.
78 out of 154 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed