4/10
This movie is a dull example of what filmmakers can do to a really great book!
8 December 2002
What an awful book adaption!

Can please anyone tell me why they have changed the wonderful book plot this way? The original author of the novel, Andreas Eschbach, carefully avoided any logic errors, like the time paradoxon problem or the fact that the main character does not recognize his own handwriting. All this was destroyed thru the radically changed new ending. Also, some of the nice details of the book were initially mentioned in the movie, but not used to the extent: the monk says that "they can take a look at the mirror every hundred years", but when the camera is examined, it has no power whatsoever.

Sorry, but this movie is a dull example of what filmmakers can do to a really great book!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed