Lots of intrigue, with many characters and alliances/betrayals to follow through a number of varied locations. Cool to see Lancaster... at who is he aiming a Winchester? Cheshire cat skills by the Frenchman, who is inscrutable even to the smartest CIA FBI man.... Dusty suits at a cool construction chase scene, Mean double-crosses on both sides of the Atlantic Sea... Smooth car chases in a Cadillac, Opel, and Mercedes 240D. Technology from the '70s at the height of CCCP/USA rivalry.... can you guess who Scorpio may be? DEFINITELY American, French, Ethiopian, Austrian, Russian, agents gunning for each other, backstabbing like a mother***, backed by shadowy string-pullers, but the whole show is a bit duller. Could be 20 mins less. Yes, kind of a over-woven mess. Slightly recommended nonetheless.....
Reviews
22 Reviews
Scorpio
(1973)
2many 2bl crosses 2 follow... even in 2022. Pretty good spy movie overall.
18 February 2022
The Devil's Rain
(1975)
Underwhelming and underachieving
29 September 2021
The Devil's Rain looked great in the trailer, but watching the whole thing really seemed tedious. Kind of a cool idea that Satan's servant on Earth is and has been collecting souls for centuries, and has now resurfaced in a tumbleweed-strewn town. Good to see known moviestar faces in some different roles. Strange that the story is a bit patchwork and hard to follow. Great stormy start to the events, but how does the whole area completely dry the day after?! Events move too quickly during a compressed time frame. Definitely should have shown Ida Lupino's character be kidnapped by Borgnine's minions in the early minutes.
Sadly, nothing becomes too cohesive until the latter minutes. Characters and plot points seem shallow or not emphasized when important. Good show to see for a fan of special effects done with heart. Gotta admire the experimentation, especially way before CGI. Probably a good selection for the last couple weeks of October.
Sadly, nothing becomes too cohesive until the latter minutes. Characters and plot points seem shallow or not emphasized when important. Good show to see for a fan of special effects done with heart. Gotta admire the experimentation, especially way before CGI. Probably a good selection for the last couple weeks of October.
Excellent episode, a bit unorthodox
1 May 2021
This one starts with archival black&white video footage from the Hungarian Revolution in 1956. Nice historical context.....It sets the stage for Magnum's search for a KGB agent from that era who is now possibly in Hawaii. Both simultaneously search for a bird-keeping recluse who is living on a secluded estate. A person from Higgins's past resurfaces as well.... Not really a great action or crime mystery, but this episode has a number of nice quirky elements, and it seems that Magnum even cedes the spotlight a bit. Higgins has a number of nice moments (especially trying to keep pace during a jog). His meticulous/suppressed personality comes across quite well too. And, the Ferrari is accompanied by a few other rarely seen guest stars: T. C.'s helicopter, a vintage Ford Bronco, and a large Parrot named Merlin (that is a key part of the final scene).
This memorable episode is well-paced, with interesting characters. You almost sympathize with the Birdman's desire for isolation. Great scenery as well.
This memorable episode is well-paced, with interesting characters. You almost sympathize with the Birdman's desire for isolation. Great scenery as well.
Very Funny episode with tight writing and great comedy
17 March 2021
Andy has found a girlfriend to propose to. Jim is reassuring him/second guessing him.... back and forth it goes. All along, the girlfriend is still married and working towards a divorce. She treats Andy almost as a son (holding a tissue while he blows his nose), while Andy is generally confused and overwhelmed. "I am good at reading people" is muttered by all 3 to various effect, and tears are shed by each character (but for different funny reasons). The girlfriend's husband appears at a club to discuss their marriage, with a dancing-figure silhouette background that incorporates Jim to great, almost slapstick effect. Not a deep or meaningful plot, but the level of funny is almost on par with the better Seinfeld episodes. Definitely Recommended....
Maniac
(1980)
Unsettling Grim Urban Death Film....with a Silence Of The Lambs-style villain
27 January 2021
A disturbing movie that depicts a maniacal serial killer and his female victims and motivations. The spree is spurred by one man's personal unresolved issues following the death of his mother. Many minutes are spent with the killer talking to himself about these issues and the ensuing killings that are his attempt at therapy. These mutterings are well done and realistic- so much so that they add an element of grim realism- not predictable or caricatured, but instead sounding erratic as a mentally ill loner might talk. The gore effects are also excellent....and definitely worth seeing for fans of Tom Savini. Cool street/crowd scenes of 1980 New York, too.
The plot itself isn't overly great or clever, although the ending is unexpected and veers into Twilight Zone territory. Unfortunately there are a few far-fetched moments that veer into disbelief (why are these victims so trusting while living in the big bad city?). Much of the set decoration seen in the killer's lair is very interesting- intriguing details that deepen the character. It was somewhat reminiscent of the basement seen in Silence Of The Lambs, and the villain of both movies is almost too-real. In fact, the Maniac has some memorable qualities that distinguish him from so many other movie slashers. Again, his internal conversations with himself & his mother are really great and give an excellent insight into his fragile psyche.
This movie is worthwhile to see. Especially when compared with other horror movies of the time. Or for any horror fan seeking lesser-known gems. Better effects than many from the era, and the exploding head scene deserves to overtake the one from Scanners.
The plot itself isn't overly great or clever, although the ending is unexpected and veers into Twilight Zone territory. Unfortunately there are a few far-fetched moments that veer into disbelief (why are these victims so trusting while living in the big bad city?). Much of the set decoration seen in the killer's lair is very interesting- intriguing details that deepen the character. It was somewhat reminiscent of the basement seen in Silence Of The Lambs, and the villain of both movies is almost too-real. In fact, the Maniac has some memorable qualities that distinguish him from so many other movie slashers. Again, his internal conversations with himself & his mother are really great and give an excellent insight into his fragile psyche.
This movie is worthwhile to see. Especially when compared with other horror movies of the time. Or for any horror fan seeking lesser-known gems. Better effects than many from the era, and the exploding head scene deserves to overtake the one from Scanners.
Mr. Mayor
(2021–2022)
Funny in a 30Rock vein
12 January 2021
Decent rapid-fire comedy with a stream of consciousness pathway of laughs. Loose and sometimes free-associating jokes that can indeed be hard to follow. But, that can also lead to strange and unexpected new humor that is rarely seen on most normal comedies. A fan of 30Rock or Arrested Development would enjoy this show.
The framework of Los Angeles mayoral politics serves well to illustrate the absurdities of modern big-city life. Political correctness and confusion provide nice fodder for Tina Fey's excellent brand of (sometimes awkward or cringeworthy) humor. Ted Danson as aged establishment straightman is a nice familiar casting. Good to have a clueless father figure to bounce jokes off of. It will be interesting to see how the youthful characters are humbled by wit and wisdom. The show does seem to have some nice possibilities.... Hopefully it doesn't become a crusade for social justice or teachable moments or anything more than a platform for stupid, but deceptively sharp, jokes.
The framework of Los Angeles mayoral politics serves well to illustrate the absurdities of modern big-city life. Political correctness and confusion provide nice fodder for Tina Fey's excellent brand of (sometimes awkward or cringeworthy) humor. Ted Danson as aged establishment straightman is a nice familiar casting. Good to have a clueless father figure to bounce jokes off of. It will be interesting to see how the youthful characters are humbled by wit and wisdom. The show does seem to have some nice possibilities.... Hopefully it doesn't become a crusade for social justice or teachable moments or anything more than a platform for stupid, but deceptively sharp, jokes.
A coiled story of perseverance
28 December 2020
Enjoyable movie with a good storyline, ok characters, and nice nostalgia. It is an interesting documentary that takes place over a few years in the life of a former video game champion, Tim McVey. His Nibbler high score achievement of the 1980s is introduced with archived footage and photos, and serves as the foundation of his ongoing quest to reclaim the worldwide high score from competing players who may or may not have bested his number in recent years. The movie follows McVey as he practices and plots the best strategy to reclaim his title. Many interviews with him, his wife, friends, Nibbler competitors, Official Video Game gatekeepers, and technical types all fill out the film and add context to the quest. Multiple locations are featured, giving it some globe-trotting scope, and the camera crew even meets with a disputed high score holder on his own turf in Italy. Iowa and Canada are also seen.
Good that the show includes McVey's Nibbler competitors.....especially when one is portrayed as a possible cheating villain. Or is he only a savvy loophole-exploiting player? And to bring in a KNOWN gaming villain (Billy Mitchell) for interviewing and supportive words helps give the movie some reach and weight, especially by overlapping with King Of Kong. Good to see Walter Day of TWIN GALAXIES get some screen time, and the personal details of his life are quite illuminating. Funny that the show somehow portrays McVey as a Rocky-type of underdog. But his ongoing successes and setbacks really give the movie some nice ups and downs. Interesting to see what he goes through trying to reclaim the title, and the true details of standing at an upright game machine for 40 hours really lend an appreciation to his zeal. Not athletic (although he does compare himself to a World Class athlete, as well as Michael Jordan) but not for the faint of heart, either. ALSO..... there are some very nice dots connected that allow this film to be about matters beyond gaming...... personal connections drawn that ANYONE can relate to regarding trials and tribulations that they may have in their own life. Inspiring and uplifting, with the spirit of camaraderie definitely overtaking the competitive nature of the subject matter.
Good that the show includes McVey's Nibbler competitors.....especially when one is portrayed as a possible cheating villain. Or is he only a savvy loophole-exploiting player? And to bring in a KNOWN gaming villain (Billy Mitchell) for interviewing and supportive words helps give the movie some reach and weight, especially by overlapping with King Of Kong. Good to see Walter Day of TWIN GALAXIES get some screen time, and the personal details of his life are quite illuminating. Funny that the show somehow portrays McVey as a Rocky-type of underdog. But his ongoing successes and setbacks really give the movie some nice ups and downs. Interesting to see what he goes through trying to reclaim the title, and the true details of standing at an upright game machine for 40 hours really lend an appreciation to his zeal. Not athletic (although he does compare himself to a World Class athlete, as well as Michael Jordan) but not for the faint of heart, either. ALSO..... there are some very nice dots connected that allow this film to be about matters beyond gaming...... personal connections drawn that ANYONE can relate to regarding trials and tribulations that they may have in their own life. Inspiring and uplifting, with the spirit of camaraderie definitely overtaking the competitive nature of the subject matter.
good, not great, true crime. Must pair with other TV show.
26 July 2020
Disturbing true crime with many moments of re-enacments. Decently paces, with good modern interviews revisiting the prosecution. How did they uncover and piece together the whole thing? And, many moments of archival video and still images to show the unvarnished truth. No CGI. Good explanatory framework that takes the viewer through the main years of Lake/Ng's crimes in an orderly path. Very good details of the events after the pair are uncovered and Ng is on the run (twice) until his 2nd arrest. Interesting re-telling of Ng's time in jail and his legal system efforts.
Light on actual video and photo evidence left by the criminal duo, but this is very well added to by another TV episode: It Takes A Killer (Partners In Evil). The re-enacments of Boneyard plus the many actual newsclips/ court evidences seen in Partners In Evil, when taken together flesh out a very disturbing picture of the murderers. Overall total of both titles would take about 2 hrs to view, but a mostly complete understanding would result.
Disturbing overview of Northern California serial killer(s)
26 July 2020
Interesting episode, with many actual evidence photos and videos. Excellent from that point, but it does gloss over much of the time between Lake's arrest, the beginnings of the investigation, and then jumps very far ahead to the final capture and final trial of his accomplice 15 years later. Many good details are left out regarding Ng's first stint in jail, and how the case was worked at that time during those first years after the pair were first uncovered. Fully understood with the TV movie The Boneyard....the two together provide a good overview.
The Reptile
(1966)
Disappointing, with a rookie Hammer feel overall
8 June 2020
I was very let down by this movie. It should have been better, but didn't really add up to much....especially the first 2/3. Lots of talk and indifferent scenes at first. So little motivation or overall explanation for the town and characters' actions as well, so that most of the early plot isn't making a lot of sense. Even the first, establishing killing, isn't clear enough to give an idea of the monster. Unfortunately so, since it could have been better if the WHO and WHAT of the town's ongoing horror was strongly set from the start. AND, the elements are there to work with: newly arrived outsiders, fearful locals, doomsday crazyman, sinister foreigner, beautiful kept daughter, mysterious fatherly doctor.
Very nice post-bite makeup effects, though, seen on victim(s). Excellent sets. Weak dialogue, other than Crazy Peter....he was memorable.
Definitely a let down when compared to other Hammer films. Not up to snuff, and almost looks like an early, flailing effort before the studio had sharpened its approach.....but, based on date, it had released other stronger titles already. Not recommended.
Very nice post-bite makeup effects, though, seen on victim(s). Excellent sets. Weak dialogue, other than Crazy Peter....he was memorable.
Definitely a let down when compared to other Hammer films. Not up to snuff, and almost looks like an early, flailing effort before the studio had sharpened its approach.....but, based on date, it had released other stronger titles already. Not recommended.
A very nice, simple, straightforward episode with a good showdown
12 February 2020
Fantastic Four battles Black Panther. Black Panther battles Claw. Origin/development story of Black Panther is shown, although it may or not clash with the 2018 big screen blockbuster-- excellent simplicity relayed in this episode regardless. Black Panther does a lot of talking and explanation of his motives for clashing with the FF and Claw. A King Kong-like animal makes an appearance, as well as a giant panther and eagle. Pretty cool.
In general the plot is: Black Panther attacks FF at their HQ, they chase him to Africa. Flashbacks show how Claw attacked BP's village and set him on the path of revenge. Events unfold from there and Claw becomes the ultimate target of all characters.
Not really the best animation overall- serviceable at best. But the true highlight is the overall feel of the plot-- good spirit of adventure and mystery. Somewhat like a 1940s-1950s action story...A simple throwback, almost. Black Panther comes off as smart and diabolical, more grounded in reality than many of the usual inter-dimensional/magical characters, but with no large-scale villainous malice (not trying to take over the earth or galaxy or whatever). His quest is a noble one.....I was almost rooting for him, or at least sympathizing with his plight. The African jungle setting was a nice change from the usual urban or space scenery. The Black Panther's final personal dilemma is a nice touch that adds well to his overall depth of character, and I like how the decision was encouraged by the Fantastic Four's leadership. A simple but uplifting ending....
In general the plot is: Black Panther attacks FF at their HQ, they chase him to Africa. Flashbacks show how Claw attacked BP's village and set him on the path of revenge. Events unfold from there and Claw becomes the ultimate target of all characters.
Not really the best animation overall- serviceable at best. But the true highlight is the overall feel of the plot-- good spirit of adventure and mystery. Somewhat like a 1940s-1950s action story...A simple throwback, almost. Black Panther comes off as smart and diabolical, more grounded in reality than many of the usual inter-dimensional/magical characters, but with no large-scale villainous malice (not trying to take over the earth or galaxy or whatever). His quest is a noble one.....I was almost rooting for him, or at least sympathizing with his plight. The African jungle setting was a nice change from the usual urban or space scenery. The Black Panther's final personal dilemma is a nice touch that adds well to his overall depth of character, and I like how the decision was encouraged by the Fantastic Four's leadership. A simple but uplifting ending....
Exterminator 2
(1984)
basically a trash-tastic mashup of Warriors+Death Wish+Breakin 2+Terminator
13 November 2019
Not great art, but this movie hits on a bunch of excellent 1980s notes. And altogether, it ends up being a worthy use of time (especially for a viewer who has enjoyed old action movies AND appreciates the synth score, and doesn't take the whole show too seriously). One must appreciate that the thug leader is muscle-bound and OF COURSE wears football shoulder pads. It could be said that the criminals' lair was illuminated by too many torches, but they do look very SAVAGE and primal. Great to see New York as the urban jungle it was, overrun by gangs and dream-denial and crime and filth and darkness....Only fit for the lawless, and ready to be cleansed by fire. EXTERMINATOR 2 fire. Could the events of this film have been an early incarnation (pre-collapse) of the NYC Prison Island seen in Escape From New York?!? Possibly.
The plot plods forward, with a bit of love sprinkled in along with revenge and underworld competition. Motivating factors indeed, but they seem a bit contrived. The Robert Ginty character only kind of has any charisma....was he meant to suffer from Vietnam PTSD? While the old (mafia) and new (wannabe Warriors) gangs vie for control, the EXTERMINATOR 2 careens towards his vigilante destiny. He does team-up with a garbage truck driver who is a jolly, enjoyable character. Together they take on the thugs. I definitely appreciated the spirited street dancing shown by many of the REAL life cast- awesome rollerskating and break dancing that were a cultural HIGHLIGHT seen in-context during their era. Fantastic music as well during these scenes....
Mario Van Peebles as the X villain is pretty good. Better than the hero, at least. His motivation and anger come across somewhat. The conflict with EXTERMINATOR 2 is not intense, unfortunately. Neither character is rooted for, beyond the sympathy given toward the death of their loved one. So it goes. Maybe the key is to understand the movie as a bunch of elements thrown together and mixed as a salad- just a bunch of things occupying a space, but not influencing one another, not giving-and-taking to make a new whole. But, if a viewer is old enough to enjoy these separate elements and/or remember them....possibly be fond of them....then this movie is right on.
The plot plods forward, with a bit of love sprinkled in along with revenge and underworld competition. Motivating factors indeed, but they seem a bit contrived. The Robert Ginty character only kind of has any charisma....was he meant to suffer from Vietnam PTSD? While the old (mafia) and new (wannabe Warriors) gangs vie for control, the EXTERMINATOR 2 careens towards his vigilante destiny. He does team-up with a garbage truck driver who is a jolly, enjoyable character. Together they take on the thugs. I definitely appreciated the spirited street dancing shown by many of the REAL life cast- awesome rollerskating and break dancing that were a cultural HIGHLIGHT seen in-context during their era. Fantastic music as well during these scenes....
Mario Van Peebles as the X villain is pretty good. Better than the hero, at least. His motivation and anger come across somewhat. The conflict with EXTERMINATOR 2 is not intense, unfortunately. Neither character is rooted for, beyond the sympathy given toward the death of their loved one. So it goes. Maybe the key is to understand the movie as a bunch of elements thrown together and mixed as a salad- just a bunch of things occupying a space, but not influencing one another, not giving-and-taking to make a new whole. But, if a viewer is old enough to enjoy these separate elements and/or remember them....possibly be fond of them....then this movie is right on.
House of Frankenstein
(1944)
Good Movie Magic (do we see the idea for frozen Han Solo?)
6 November 2019
A viewer can't really go too wrong by seeing a movie with Frankenstein's Monster, The Wolfman, Dracula, a Mad Scientist (Boris Karloff), a Hunchback, and a Dancing Gypsy Queen. AND, the score is great- deep bass (cello?) tones and high pitched trumpet notes and fantastic strings all SO well used (with NO SOUNDTRACK songs by any rock band, etc.) that the atmosphere becomes even more effective.... on top of the already great lighting/fog/sets. Some very good special FX enhance the classic look- the Wolfman's transformation is especially enjoyable. But so is the great skeleton-to-living body morphing seen when Dracula springs back to life. Lack of CGI is a welcome change compared to modern movies.
The plot is pretty good, and almost seems like two movies. The first mini movie seems to mainly concern Dracula, with the second focusing on the Wolfman and Frankenstein. Niemann the Mad Scientist is the linking thread between the two movie sections once he is able to escape from prison and set things in motion. The quest of Niemann to follow in Dr. Frankenstein's footsteps takes him from prison to countryside to castle to laboratory. His efforts straddle the line of legality, seasoned with a desire for revenge and scientific advancement. Good pacing, and events move quickly enough, with a good balance of talking and stunts/action. Not much mystery, but the one-sided longing of Daniel the Hunchback is very sad. The scene where the Dancing Gypsy first becomes aware of his deformity is very sobering, and gives the movie a moment of true emotion. His role makes for a nice consistency throughout the film.....I was rooting for him overall. And to see him ruthlessly whipping other characters was empowering for anyone pulling for the "little guy". Other characters maybe aren't perfect (some have noted the underachieving Dracula) and the acting could have been more potent. But to see these famous movie monsters together is the draw more than thespian pretensions.
Overall, this movie seems to be a lightweight-classic. Compact and clear if a bit shallow, it checks a number of worthy boxes.
And oh yeah....could the frozen Wolfman be the inspiration for Han Solo's Empire Strikes Back entombment?
The plot is pretty good, and almost seems like two movies. The first mini movie seems to mainly concern Dracula, with the second focusing on the Wolfman and Frankenstein. Niemann the Mad Scientist is the linking thread between the two movie sections once he is able to escape from prison and set things in motion. The quest of Niemann to follow in Dr. Frankenstein's footsteps takes him from prison to countryside to castle to laboratory. His efforts straddle the line of legality, seasoned with a desire for revenge and scientific advancement. Good pacing, and events move quickly enough, with a good balance of talking and stunts/action. Not much mystery, but the one-sided longing of Daniel the Hunchback is very sad. The scene where the Dancing Gypsy first becomes aware of his deformity is very sobering, and gives the movie a moment of true emotion. His role makes for a nice consistency throughout the film.....I was rooting for him overall. And to see him ruthlessly whipping other characters was empowering for anyone pulling for the "little guy". Other characters maybe aren't perfect (some have noted the underachieving Dracula) and the acting could have been more potent. But to see these famous movie monsters together is the draw more than thespian pretensions.
Overall, this movie seems to be a lightweight-classic. Compact and clear if a bit shallow, it checks a number of worthy boxes.
And oh yeah....could the frozen Wolfman be the inspiration for Han Solo's Empire Strikes Back entombment?
Legend of the Werewolf
(1975)
Tolerated but not really recommended
9 October 2019
Legend Of The Werewolf starts out ok and ends ok, but much of the middle drags and had me looking at remaining runtime starting about half way through. Overall fair, and not a wasted viewing, but indifferent at best.
The werewolf storyline is acceptable, and nothing new is presented....but it seems competent, with the bases covered (silver bullet, Lycanthropy, quasi-Gothic setting both rural and urban). Maybe this being a Peter Cushing movie is part of the attraction. Maybe the English filmmakers (thanks to influence of Hammer Studios) were operating in a waning context of excellence.....good lighting and score/ sound effects and costumes and sets do help keep the atmosphere proper to allow belief (and negate the shlocky cringe factor). As if they had a good formula going that prevented collapse. Some ongoing colorful characters, especially the Popeye-like Innkeeper and skeptical Madamé, enhance much of the film. Same with the sewer fisherman. And the photographer. Good Werewolf, and he almost seemed a sympathetic character worth rooting for, especially after seeing his sideshow exploitation beginnings. Maybe a flashback or two would have helped flesh out the character a bit more? No deficiency, though. Good Werewolf makeup, and the transformations seemed pretty good for 1975. Not expecting too much is key with this flick. It seemed like a glorified TV movie- slightly intense but competent. Solid with no real zing.
Badlands
(1973)
Innocuous treatment of killing; random and indifferent flight from justice
7 August 2019
Good overall, but not terribly compelling. Both characters are a bit boring, and their love story doesn't seem like a transcendent fable.....was it even supposed to be? Just a killer couple on the run through some really nice North Midwest Territory. To me, much of the enjoyment was based on the great scenery: Wide open spaces, Big Sky views, and the unending USA ahead of the pair as they flee. Excellent environmental appreciation shown by this movie- rivers, mountains, sky, foliage, prairie animals, back roads.....
Sissy Spacek is pretty good as a naive young woman who meekly goes along with Martin Sheen's murder spree. She definitely gave a performance that would have been really great had it been more fleshed out- to see her evolve a bit as the journey went on. Interesting when compared to her later role in 3 Women (1977). Martin Sheen was a good villain to root against. After a while, his spree almost seemed unreal....how can he continue to elude? For a few scenes he was reminiscent of an Outlaw Elvis- running around with a rifle and white t-shirt and perfect hair.
I disliked the carefree treatment of killing. So nonchalant. Not really glorified, but very throwaway. Too mundane. Any insight into the mind of Sheen's character would have been interesting. Spacek presented a good simple perspective. Maybe that was the intent, to be one-sided and much more innocent.
Recommended, especially for any fan of either actor. Unfortunately, overall it just seemed like another murder spree movie, although much less graphic.
Sissy Spacek is pretty good as a naive young woman who meekly goes along with Martin Sheen's murder spree. She definitely gave a performance that would have been really great had it been more fleshed out- to see her evolve a bit as the journey went on. Interesting when compared to her later role in 3 Women (1977). Martin Sheen was a good villain to root against. After a while, his spree almost seemed unreal....how can he continue to elude? For a few scenes he was reminiscent of an Outlaw Elvis- running around with a rifle and white t-shirt and perfect hair.
I disliked the carefree treatment of killing. So nonchalant. Not really glorified, but very throwaway. Too mundane. Any insight into the mind of Sheen's character would have been interesting. Spacek presented a good simple perspective. Maybe that was the intent, to be one-sided and much more innocent.
Recommended, especially for any fan of either actor. Unfortunately, overall it just seemed like another murder spree movie, although much less graphic.
C.H.U.D.
(1984)
Decent (mostly boring) Horror with a great RAW finalé
2 August 2019
If only the first hour had been more like the last 30 minutes.....OR BETTER YET--like the final 10 minutes. Dragging and slow, and that doesn't even describe the actions of the underground dwellers or the overground characters. And, the CHUDs are great, but not seen enough. Well done creature effects.....more screen time would have allowed them to be household names along with Vorhees and Krueger. Really nice looking, and almost worth seeing the whole movie to see these creatures on screen. More screentime for these savage characters could have drastically improved this movie- they aren't really seen until about the 60 minute mark. Lots of other graphic gore as well: post-attack bodies that look almost too realistic. Disturbing, but impressive. Cool for those who appreciate rubber-suit monsters/fx of the past.
The plot seemed slow, and the characters bland. A.J. The Reverend was maybe the best character. The homeless population didn't really become too differentiated- more of a faceless crowd. Bygone New York also makes for a nice environment, with the urban grit and dark, shabby corners. The police and political corruption help the story along, but not really in any colorful way. Blah. THE FINAL 10 MINUTES ARE TERRIFIC! They don't fully redeem the movie, but help the viewer forget how much this story dragged during the first hour. Sort of like Escape From NY- insane disregard for whatever SHOULD happen at the end.
Maybe this could be remade, especially using the refurbished/rebuilt NYC as a backdrop for a new wave of attacks by the remaining CHUDs. Possibly as a reminder of the city's dangerous, corrupt, and dirty past. And as a reminder of the danger and oblivion lurking so, so close by in everyone's daily normalized life. Random fate can be cruel. Especially considering the current environmental contempt shown by so many toward the planet, this super monster might scare some into taking better care of their home.
The plot seemed slow, and the characters bland. A.J. The Reverend was maybe the best character. The homeless population didn't really become too differentiated- more of a faceless crowd. Bygone New York also makes for a nice environment, with the urban grit and dark, shabby corners. The police and political corruption help the story along, but not really in any colorful way. Blah. THE FINAL 10 MINUTES ARE TERRIFIC! They don't fully redeem the movie, but help the viewer forget how much this story dragged during the first hour. Sort of like Escape From NY- insane disregard for whatever SHOULD happen at the end.
Maybe this could be remade, especially using the refurbished/rebuilt NYC as a backdrop for a new wave of attacks by the remaining CHUDs. Possibly as a reminder of the city's dangerous, corrupt, and dirty past. And as a reminder of the danger and oblivion lurking so, so close by in everyone's daily normalized life. Random fate can be cruel. Especially considering the current environmental contempt shown by so many toward the planet, this super monster might scare some into taking better care of their home.
Predator 2
(1990)
Not quite rocket science but pretty good. A welcome urban elaboration.
24 July 2019
When compared to the first Predator, this one slightly falls flat. Very few good one-liners, and no Arnold Schwarzenegger. No Jesse Ventura either. BUT, more blood and upside down corpses than the original sort of helps this installment. The final scenes (with the ancient pistol) definitely add 1 star and bring up some great questions that could make for some good sequels. AND, the Predator has more screen time as well as revealing more subtle elements to its character (i.e. not killing a pregnant woman or child). Yes it is kind of just different window-dressing applied to a favorite villain. Yet, the urban scenery and Danny Glover -NOT Arnold Action Hero- kind of makes for an enjoyable elaboration on the original movie. Would it be better if everything from the first was just revisited in the second as a rehash? To me, it is great to see the Predator wreaking havoc in gritty, drug war-torn L.A. The different city environments and scenarios are great, and Glover is a welcome character (NOT a super Alpha male in some fantasy video game setting). He is good as an almost "everyday" cop who physically stands no chance against the alien. Instead, his reliance/opposition to others and THE SYSTEM is an interesting angle. The city itself allows some nice different canvases (subway, skyscraper, dangerous alleys) for the Predator to interact in. Sort of an Urban Jungle of its own.
The plot isn't really riveting, and maybe there are scientific holes here and there. But I watched it mainly for the Predator- to see the great hunter in action and dueling against new foes. Definitely welcome is the return of the familiar heat vision, voice translating, and light-bending camouflage. New weapons and a peek into the alien spaceship/trophy room are also great tidbits. Details, yes, but cool to have more elements to understand the iconic character with. More Predators (with names - check the IMDB trivia section) arrive in a fantastic short scene, too.
Overall this movie isn't as cohesive as the first- numerous side distractions that detract from the focus. It is hard to understand who/which are the key points and how they affect the pursuit of the Predator. Glover pursuing the alien alone in L.A. would have made for a more streamlined story. Gary Busey does well as a government agent who works with and against Glover. His personality is unhinged and erratic, and would have been a good addition to the first Predator movie. And, some of his crew's pursuit of the Predator seemed to predict the look of the X-Files....at least the use of flashlights, government secrecy, and rogue violent tactics. The addition of Morton Downey Jr. is surreal to anyone who remembers his tv show. Interesting elements of media voyeurism and reality tv are acknowledged here in their early stages.
I'd watch this again. And recommend it to anyone who likes older action/sci-fi movies. It doesn't need to be viewed shortly after the original- it stands alone and can be appreciated without knowing much from the first Predator. Being a fan of the first movie helps though. Good Sci-fi with a big budget and great (old-style) effects.
The plot isn't really riveting, and maybe there are scientific holes here and there. But I watched it mainly for the Predator- to see the great hunter in action and dueling against new foes. Definitely welcome is the return of the familiar heat vision, voice translating, and light-bending camouflage. New weapons and a peek into the alien spaceship/trophy room are also great tidbits. Details, yes, but cool to have more elements to understand the iconic character with. More Predators (with names - check the IMDB trivia section) arrive in a fantastic short scene, too.
Overall this movie isn't as cohesive as the first- numerous side distractions that detract from the focus. It is hard to understand who/which are the key points and how they affect the pursuit of the Predator. Glover pursuing the alien alone in L.A. would have made for a more streamlined story. Gary Busey does well as a government agent who works with and against Glover. His personality is unhinged and erratic, and would have been a good addition to the first Predator movie. And, some of his crew's pursuit of the Predator seemed to predict the look of the X-Files....at least the use of flashlights, government secrecy, and rogue violent tactics. The addition of Morton Downey Jr. is surreal to anyone who remembers his tv show. Interesting elements of media voyeurism and reality tv are acknowledged here in their early stages.
I'd watch this again. And recommend it to anyone who likes older action/sci-fi movies. It doesn't need to be viewed shortly after the original- it stands alone and can be appreciated without knowing much from the first Predator. Being a fan of the first movie helps though. Good Sci-fi with a big budget and great (old-style) effects.
Sharon's Baby
(1975)
Slightly acceptable and tepid, slow, but almost Omen-like
9 July 2019
This title is a fairly slow watch, with too little backstory to enhance the characters. Slightly bizarre soundtrack (mouth harp?). Many good 1970s elements sort of evince urban, dreary, swinging London. Donald Pleasance adds about 1/2 star to any horror film for those who like him from Halloween. Joan Collins is pretty good, but unconvincing as a former nightclub dancer who has suddenly gotten middle-class religion. Good, spot-on portrayals of the nun and older housekeeper. None of these elements add to anything more than an indifferent movie. Not intense enough, or really at all.
Some creativity would have added an extra star to the rating. Boring, simple sets and costumes that could have added sinister depth with only a bit of horrific study (candles, capes, random pentagram, etc...). If only the images of the baby in the crib were more evil.... at least focused eyes or malevolent gestures would help. Additionally, a few disturbing seconds of flashbacks/whatever would have helped the dwarf's mystical and menacing agenda.....which then would hang like a fearful possession over the whole movie. Same with the nun- if only her persona and holy-warrior strengths were fleshed out a bit better. And why not a shot of the dwarf's lair, replete with books on curses and spells and amulets and The Dark Arts?! It can't be easy to inhabit a new body. Shallow.
Definitely this movie holds some nice, random elements. But very few of which stitch together into any great scary movie fabric. Cool old cars, fashions, and household technology/decoration of the era are all nice to see. Nightclub scenery has sleaze appeal, too.
Some creativity would have added an extra star to the rating. Boring, simple sets and costumes that could have added sinister depth with only a bit of horrific study (candles, capes, random pentagram, etc...). If only the images of the baby in the crib were more evil.... at least focused eyes or malevolent gestures would help. Additionally, a few disturbing seconds of flashbacks/whatever would have helped the dwarf's mystical and menacing agenda.....which then would hang like a fearful possession over the whole movie. Same with the nun- if only her persona and holy-warrior strengths were fleshed out a bit better. And why not a shot of the dwarf's lair, replete with books on curses and spells and amulets and The Dark Arts?! It can't be easy to inhabit a new body. Shallow.
Definitely this movie holds some nice, random elements. But very few of which stitch together into any great scary movie fabric. Cool old cars, fashions, and household technology/decoration of the era are all nice to see. Nightclub scenery has sleaze appeal, too.
Cellar Dweller
(1987)
"Death Is Sad" - a cartoony monster-piece (NOT masterpiece)
9 May 2019
An enjoyable less-serious movie to be watched on a lark. Decent viewing for those interested in goofy 1980s horror, comics, female empowerment, non-CGI monstrous demons, artistic folly, and reincarnation. The short running time makes it an easy investment, and the pacing is fair. Unfortunately it also suffers from some bad lapses in logic, one of which (in last 10 mins) would have made for an excellent twist had the idea not been abandoned. See if you catch it....
Overall, it is a nice story with ok (at best) horror elements. The plot follows a comics artist as she seeks to follow in the footsteps of her hero who perished mysteriously while drawing evil creations in the basement of the art school she now attends. Demonic conjuring happens via the panels he drew, and she somehow learns the same technique while dueling with other residents of the house. Romance happens, but seems a bit forced or hollow. Special effects could have been more imaginative, regardless of budget. Unmemorable dialogue, but the throwback gumshoe is kind of funny as a caricature. Frank (Dr. Strange) Brunner's artwork is fantastic, but it looks like he only did some of the more detailed pages, not all the artwork. Interesting moments occur when the comic panels come to life, and the artist takes control of the events with her pen. I do wish this had been explored more thoroughly or defined more clearly.....cool ideas that are not fully fleshed out, while a bunch of peripheral chaos is added and just muddles the mix. Misdirections, maybe, but these tangents are so frayed that they are a bit tedious. Why not have the taxi driver reappear later to help or menace?! Coulda been, shoulda been....
Really, it is an alright movie with some enjoyable elements that don't add to a great cohesive whole. Fun, and lighthearted.
Overall, it is a nice story with ok (at best) horror elements. The plot follows a comics artist as she seeks to follow in the footsteps of her hero who perished mysteriously while drawing evil creations in the basement of the art school she now attends. Demonic conjuring happens via the panels he drew, and she somehow learns the same technique while dueling with other residents of the house. Romance happens, but seems a bit forced or hollow. Special effects could have been more imaginative, regardless of budget. Unmemorable dialogue, but the throwback gumshoe is kind of funny as a caricature. Frank (Dr. Strange) Brunner's artwork is fantastic, but it looks like he only did some of the more detailed pages, not all the artwork. Interesting moments occur when the comic panels come to life, and the artist takes control of the events with her pen. I do wish this had been explored more thoroughly or defined more clearly.....cool ideas that are not fully fleshed out, while a bunch of peripheral chaos is added and just muddles the mix. Misdirections, maybe, but these tangents are so frayed that they are a bit tedious. Why not have the taxi driver reappear later to help or menace?! Coulda been, shoulda been....
Really, it is an alright movie with some enjoyable elements that don't add to a great cohesive whole. Fun, and lighthearted.
The Source Family
(2012)
an inside look at the bygone/timeless
17 April 2019
This documentary is excellent as a time-machined view back to the 1970-1975 California lifestyle as lived by a strange cult that was financed by a successful Los Angeles restaurant. It is very interesting to see so much unpolished archival footage. Thankfully it isn't "animated" or enhanced in the tacky way that other documentaries have done (In The Realms Of The Unreal). Videos, photos, and audio recordings fill-out this movie so well, that the viewer almost feels as if they are a frequent visitor to the Source Family's housing compound. Many modern interviews, both respectful and regretful, make for great color commentary on the events as they were lived by the participants. And, amazing to see Billy Corgan (Smashing Pumpkins) attest to the greatness of the ?music? produced by this group. Songs are played and concert footage is shown (Beverly Hills High School 1973) so that the viewer can then decide on the musicianship.
Both great and goofy, this movie has moments of clarity as well as opaque clouds of hazy gibberish. Luckily, the commune leader invested in recording equipment so that history can judge the transcendent quality of everything. Or the disposable folly of it all. But, there it is. A current Family archivist plays a major role in providing the raw materials seen on screen. Thankfully, the movie-makers do not inject their own viewpoints too heavily. Supposedly the Family numbered about 140, and only a fraction of that number is interviewed.
Ultimately, this movie is well worth seeing for anyone interested in cults, leaders, charisma, messiahs, hippies, hucksters, astrology, orgies, the 1960s-1970s, free love, psychedelic music, communes, utopias, and hang gliding.
Both great and goofy, this movie has moments of clarity as well as opaque clouds of hazy gibberish. Luckily, the commune leader invested in recording equipment so that history can judge the transcendent quality of everything. Or the disposable folly of it all. But, there it is. A current Family archivist plays a major role in providing the raw materials seen on screen. Thankfully, the movie-makers do not inject their own viewpoints too heavily. Supposedly the Family numbered about 140, and only a fraction of that number is interviewed.
Ultimately, this movie is well worth seeing for anyone interested in cults, leaders, charisma, messiahs, hippies, hucksters, astrology, orgies, the 1960s-1970s, free love, psychedelic music, communes, utopias, and hang gliding.
Decent Death Wish, but Bronson seems less menacing
5 April 2019
This one is a fair entrant to the Death Wish series. Maybe just 4th best (I, II, IV, V, III) based on my computations, though. Really, the villain O'Shea is the BEST aspect of this movie. He is a great crime boss who has a lot of scummy presence....with some excellent explosive moments of losing his composure when dealing with his own bumbling henchmen. Unfortunately, Paul Keresy/Charles Bronson is BARELY the 2nd best aspect of this movie---and even a distant second. If only he had more personal animation or enthusiasm when expressing his need for revenge, it would all hang menacingly over the events and actions he takes later. It seems as if the flick assumes the viewer is of course familiar with Kersey's past losses, and as a result doesn't make any effort to convey his intense motivations this time. Yes, the viewer already basically knows them, but at least this appetizer could set the table properly; the break-in scene of #1 was quite disturbing and effective at that.
Unfortunately much of what made the first Death Wish great was the citywide New York scope, with many scenes taking place in the dark night with only hazy, anemic lighting keeping the shadows and urban chaos barely at bay. This Death Wish (was it really straight-to-video?) doesn't have the sprawl that made Kersey a citywide scourge. His presence is now small and localized. Not a huge drawback, but I liked the idea of him being a vigilante on the loose, NYC's MOST WANTED, at odds with the authorities and inspiring even the meekest to stand up. This Death Wish (1994) has a smaller scope that doesn't really allow the city to show its grimy stuff....and the 1970s fashions made #1 and #2 have some funk and life. #5 has lots of artificial and cold lighting, with a period-correct 1990s look. And that's acceptable, since good movie violence does indeed happen in a disturbing manner, with some imaginative deaths, and some over the top ones, too. It is satisfying as an action movie since these boxes are checked, and the quota is met.
What and who surrounds Kersey throughout this movie is mostly forgettable. Olivia Regent is fair as his love interest, and she evoked empathy, having such a difficult plight and position as O'Shea's former love interest. The fiancé's daughter plays a part in Bronson's revenge, but not as a very noteworthy character. Other associates come and go, and Kersey does interact with them. Enemies, too. Some folks die, some endure, but nobody makes much impression either way. Again, O'Shea is fantastic, and he for sure adds a star or two to this movie. I found myself curious to know his history--how did he climb the mafia ranks? how different was he with his newborn daughter? how did he earn so much power in the garment industry? was his childhood traumatic or was the ruthlessness learned later? At what point did he begin wearing those sharp sunglasses? He's an excellent villain, to be sure. Looking forward to his demise proves it.
Ultimately, this Death Wish is acceptable. But it does seem as if a different, almost "out to pasture" Bronson is the one exacting revenge. Compared to the Paul Kersey of #1 and #2, this one was similar in name only, and disappointingly didn't much seem like an aged or violence-weary revenant. Could he have donned a mid-length leather jacket to be more funky, lawless, mysterious, fabled, inspiring, punishing, and devastating.....YES.
Unfortunately much of what made the first Death Wish great was the citywide New York scope, with many scenes taking place in the dark night with only hazy, anemic lighting keeping the shadows and urban chaos barely at bay. This Death Wish (was it really straight-to-video?) doesn't have the sprawl that made Kersey a citywide scourge. His presence is now small and localized. Not a huge drawback, but I liked the idea of him being a vigilante on the loose, NYC's MOST WANTED, at odds with the authorities and inspiring even the meekest to stand up. This Death Wish (1994) has a smaller scope that doesn't really allow the city to show its grimy stuff....and the 1970s fashions made #1 and #2 have some funk and life. #5 has lots of artificial and cold lighting, with a period-correct 1990s look. And that's acceptable, since good movie violence does indeed happen in a disturbing manner, with some imaginative deaths, and some over the top ones, too. It is satisfying as an action movie since these boxes are checked, and the quota is met.
What and who surrounds Kersey throughout this movie is mostly forgettable. Olivia Regent is fair as his love interest, and she evoked empathy, having such a difficult plight and position as O'Shea's former love interest. The fiancé's daughter plays a part in Bronson's revenge, but not as a very noteworthy character. Other associates come and go, and Kersey does interact with them. Enemies, too. Some folks die, some endure, but nobody makes much impression either way. Again, O'Shea is fantastic, and he for sure adds a star or two to this movie. I found myself curious to know his history--how did he climb the mafia ranks? how different was he with his newborn daughter? how did he earn so much power in the garment industry? was his childhood traumatic or was the ruthlessness learned later? At what point did he begin wearing those sharp sunglasses? He's an excellent villain, to be sure. Looking forward to his demise proves it.
Ultimately, this Death Wish is acceptable. But it does seem as if a different, almost "out to pasture" Bronson is the one exacting revenge. Compared to the Paul Kersey of #1 and #2, this one was similar in name only, and disappointingly didn't much seem like an aged or violence-weary revenant. Could he have donned a mid-length leather jacket to be more funky, lawless, mysterious, fabled, inspiring, punishing, and devastating.....YES.
Dementia 13
(2017)
Decent as a modern movie, proper as a remake.
27 March 2019
This remake is a nice update of the original. It is a bit of an improvement, while retaining the framework of the first. Both are enjoyable, but this edition benefits from color and technology.....ghostly CGI to be exact. The overall haunting presence of the deceased Kathleen is enhanced at times by depicting supernatural elements that were not present in the original. So, the specter of Kathleen (the drowned sister) is much more active in this movie. She exerts quite a force over the events. Actually, the murderer almost plays second-fiddle to her, at least as far as menacing presences go.
As the characters gather for a family reunion/memorial at their ancestral castle, the plot takes shape. Romantic backstabbing, a robbery scheme, familial financial squabbling, and mental illness all move the story along until the killer takes over. And, even the castle itself makes for a nice lesser background character, with its secret passages, crumbling outbuildings, disturbing statues, and antique furnishings. Unfortunately much of the critical action and talk takes place in one main room, while the rest of the fantastic building was barely used. Other minor tangents are introduced, with some only fraying the chaos beyond relevance. And yet, I would have liked a couple themes to have been expanded on: the construction of the castle using exploited immigrant labor, the family's wealth linked to slavery, and the ability/failure of the male characters to protect or provide. This remake could have earned an extra star by exploring or honing some of its tangents for 10-15 extra minutes. Still, kudos for making the effort.....
The movie overall is good for the first hour. Almost an amped-up Twilight Zone, with moments of brutal gore (but not overdone or fixated on). Well-paced, with decent character development. Unfortunately no one emerges as someone you'd want to see dispatched by the masked killer. And nobody deserves rooting for, either...No huge cinematic drawback either way. Kathleen does sort of lurk throughout the movie, and special fx magic materializes her ghostly presence quite well. The dialogue is acceptable until the final 20 minutes, after which it becomes almost absurd because WHY WOULD PEOPLE FEARING FOR THEIR LIVES SUDDENLY LOSE ALL TRACES OF ADRENALINE WHEN THE KILLER IS UNMASKED?!??!!! Ridiculous, and this downshift really soured the film in my eyes. I was rooting for it and enjoying it as a picture that punched above its weight class. But it sorta pulled back on its final punch, with the killer explaining motivations in a "doctor's office casual" demeanor- not rabid, insane, or menacing enough.
This remake, on its own, is worth seeing. A short run-time helps it be a decent time filler when there is a slow evening. Probably NOT worth seeing if you expect a masterwork or landmark film. Well worth viewing if you have seen and enjoyed the original Dementia 13. Not every new element is successful, but the spirit of the original lingers with this modern remake.
As the characters gather for a family reunion/memorial at their ancestral castle, the plot takes shape. Romantic backstabbing, a robbery scheme, familial financial squabbling, and mental illness all move the story along until the killer takes over. And, even the castle itself makes for a nice lesser background character, with its secret passages, crumbling outbuildings, disturbing statues, and antique furnishings. Unfortunately much of the critical action and talk takes place in one main room, while the rest of the fantastic building was barely used. Other minor tangents are introduced, with some only fraying the chaos beyond relevance. And yet, I would have liked a couple themes to have been expanded on: the construction of the castle using exploited immigrant labor, the family's wealth linked to slavery, and the ability/failure of the male characters to protect or provide. This remake could have earned an extra star by exploring or honing some of its tangents for 10-15 extra minutes. Still, kudos for making the effort.....
The movie overall is good for the first hour. Almost an amped-up Twilight Zone, with moments of brutal gore (but not overdone or fixated on). Well-paced, with decent character development. Unfortunately no one emerges as someone you'd want to see dispatched by the masked killer. And nobody deserves rooting for, either...No huge cinematic drawback either way. Kathleen does sort of lurk throughout the movie, and special fx magic materializes her ghostly presence quite well. The dialogue is acceptable until the final 20 minutes, after which it becomes almost absurd because WHY WOULD PEOPLE FEARING FOR THEIR LIVES SUDDENLY LOSE ALL TRACES OF ADRENALINE WHEN THE KILLER IS UNMASKED?!??!!! Ridiculous, and this downshift really soured the film in my eyes. I was rooting for it and enjoying it as a picture that punched above its weight class. But it sorta pulled back on its final punch, with the killer explaining motivations in a "doctor's office casual" demeanor- not rabid, insane, or menacing enough.
This remake, on its own, is worth seeing. A short run-time helps it be a decent time filler when there is a slow evening. Probably NOT worth seeing if you expect a masterwork or landmark film. Well worth viewing if you have seen and enjoyed the original Dementia 13. Not every new element is successful, but the spirit of the original lingers with this modern remake.
Tell Your Friends