Reviews

21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Thought-provoking and inventive
31 December 2023
Wild Strawberries is the second Ingmar Bergman movie I've watched, and I'm starting to seriously consider going through his entire discography. Both this and Persona feel incredibly ahead of their time and inventive in how they utilize the medium to tell stories and explore theme. The level of creativity and craftsmanship pulsating through nearly every frame of these films is amazing, and I'm seriously impressed in how Wild Strawberries and Persona are both equal parts artsy surrealist pieces and grounded narrative dramas.

As for Wild Strawberries in particular, I became promptly interested in watching it after stumbling across an excerpt of the iconic opening dream sequence online, which, in its full glory, is just as entrancing as I had hoped. The entire film is so astoundingly poetic and rich with meaning, yet Bergman rarely comes across as heavy-handed.

Overall, it's awfully close to being a 9.0, but, although I was consistently enveloped in the film's melancholy and doldrums, there rarely came a singular moment that hit me inordinately hard emotionally. Regardless, this is a timeless film with even more timeless themes. Plus, its final message is surprisingly inspiring, warm, and hopeful, especially considering Bergman's notorious nihilism.

8.9 / 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eighth Grade (2018)
8/10
Touching, funny, and relatable
5 September 2023
Bo Burnham's Eighth Grade captures the nuances adolescence more authentically than maybe any movie I've ever seen. As someone who was actually in the eighth grade in 2018, I can confidently attest that this movie is unbelievably spot-on. I'm amazed by Burnham's attention to detail and dedication to making the world of the movie so real. This is, of course, aided by the child actors who are all amazing in their respective roles, especially Elsie Fisher (who plays Kayla).

The heart of the story is ultimately the father-daughter relationship between Kayla and her dad. This relationship is written and acted to absolute perfection from start to finish, culminating in a powerful climactic scene between the two that might make your eyes well up.

Though I mostly appreciate the film for its strengths as a drama, it should be duly noted Eighth Grade is a really funny comedy as well, blending the two genres effortlessly. All in all, I believe Eighth Grade to be one of the best coming-of-age stories of the late 2010s and a must-see movie for anyone who was in middle school when this movie released.

8.5 - 8.9 / 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bronson (2008)
7/10
Impressive, but ultimately pointless
5 September 2023
Bronson is unquestionably well-done in many respects. For examples of the film's prowess, look no further than its ever-present creativity and originality, brutal, minimalistic, but perfectly fitting cinematography and coloration, and, most of all, Tom Hardy's career-topping performance as the lead character. However, while the movie is certainly impressive on those fronts, it didn't really click for me personally. Sure, it's well done, but I'm just not hugely captivated by the story due to the lack of any substantial message or arc.

On the off-hand, I can see how the movie's lack of a point is the point... by refusing to present or even seek out answers for Bronson's brutality or continued evil, the film successfully showcases a senseless need for violence and cruelty that is just beyond the average person's comprehension. Nonetheless, I think this idea is conveyed pretty early on, meaning, the movie just gets repetitive after a while.

However, the movie's merits ultimately outweigh its faults. With this performance, Hardy cemented himself as one of the most skilled and versatile actors of his generation, and, for that reason alone, Bronson is worth a watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Babylon (I) (2022)
10/10
BABYLON - A Future Cult Classic
31 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
In just two weeks of theatrical release, Damien Chazelle's epic period piece about the silent film era, BABYLON, has become the most fiercely polarizing and divisive piece of cinema of 2022. If anything, its reception has been mostly underwhelming, and its performance at the box office, frankly, abysmal.

As a huge fan of Chazelle's previous work, Babylon has long-been a movie I have anticipated. Due to the initial critical reviews, as well as the depressing box office numbers, I walked into the theater with a feeling of uncertainty. By the time I walked out, plastered on my face was a smile. Simply, I was smiling with the joy of having watched the film. For that alone, Babylon deserves my praise, but for everything else the movie has to offer, my praise is lovingly granted.

BABYLON - A FUTURE CULT CLASSIC

Babylon is a cinematic experience like no other this year. Heck, it's an experience like almost no other this century. It's a lightning bolt of a film - a hectic, chaotic, yet still poignant escapade that slaps you by the wrist and firmly holds on until the final frame. It's brave, audacious, and hugely provocative, but ultimately, it's the movie cinema needs now more than ever.

On a technical level, there's not much even the film's most passionate detractors can take away from it. Beautifully shot, supremely scored, whilst also featuring this year's best costume and set design, it's hard to not become completely immersed in Babylon's blazingly unique take on the 1920's - 1930's film industry. On a performance level, the 3-piece dramatic core of Diego Calva, Margot Robbie, and Brad Pitt outdo themselves, especially Robbie who, in my eyes, gives the performance of her career thus far.

Chazelle wastes no time lunging the viewer headfirst into the intense and debaucherous landscape that he has meticulously adapted for them. This is, admittedly, for both its benefit and detriment. The opening 20 minute party sequence is one of the most exquisitely edited, scored, and filmed stretches in the movie's entire 3 hour runtime. It does a great job of letting the viewer know that this depiction of Hollywood is gonna be more unsettling and depraved than they're used to seeing on the big screen. However, all in all, (basically) the first two scenes of the movie (if you know, you know) are by far the most disgusting and shock-value oriented scenes in the picture. They don't really add anything of value, narratively or thematically, considering Chazelle will spend the next 15 minutes elucidating on the depravity of the industry anyway.

Luckily, following those two questionable scenes, Babylon is very nearly flawless in my eyes, except for a little smudge here and there.

The one word I would describe the movie with is "crescendo". The character's journeys and the number of spectacular sequences in the film are like a flame on a stick of dynamite burning, burning, burning, until the inevitable bang, the climax, the resolve... whether that resolve is the flame suddenly burning out or the flame torching everything around it. It was not a movie I was expecting to keep me on the edge of my seat, but for 3 hours and 9 minutes, there I sat.

An interesting aspect of Babylon's release is the fact it's a part of the recent flood of Hollywood movies about Hollywood. It's a subgenre of dramas that critics usually adore. Just in the last few years, think of the critical success of movies like The Fabelmans, Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, A Star Is Born, and even Chazelle's own La La Land. Babylon, despite being in the same subgenre as these great movies, stands out like a sore thumb when placed next to them. Babylon's unflinching and, at times, discomforting take on the industry is unlike anything I've ever seen, but most closely resembles David Lynch's Mulholland Drive if anything.

Babylon is at its core, a story of ugliness and beauty coexisting in the same space. It's a scathing critique of the culture and system of Hollywood but one of the most poignant and honest love letters to the art-form of cinema I've ever seen.

A far-cry from the magical and glamorous look at the industry seen in most movies about the subject, Babylon knocks Hollywood off its gold pedestal and exposes the seedy underbelly of its sparkly covering. No scene personifies this idea like the absolutely terrifying and riveting sequence where mob boss James McKay, played with absolutely scene-chewing perfection by the excellent Tobey Maguire, leads Calva's Manny into what he calls "the a**hole of L. A": a nightmare-inducing underground Hollywood party that acts as a metaphor for the darkness of the industry itself. In this party is depravity, hedonism, exploitation, and immorality to the furthest extent. Maguire's McKay simply sees it as "fun" and a "good time". Each floor you go down in this party reveals even more debauchery until they get to the main act at the bottom. There is a large man who is chained up and exploited. Notably, he "will do anything for money". Sound like any of our characters? Is this underground hellhole beginning to sound like the dark version of Hollywood Babylon presents to us? Full of exploitation, bigotry, and disregard for basic moral goodness.

The concept of Hollywood masquerading its own degeneracy is cleverly represented in the opening party sequence where, to distract the partygoers from noticing the body of an overdosed teenager, they, ironically, put an elephant in the room to distract from the real elephant in the room.

In the book of the Bible, the city of Babylon is known as the city of sin. By titling the picture this, Chazelle directly connects Hollywood to wrongdoing and sin. However, this biblical allusion is also connected to the character's journeys. In the bible, the Babylonians famously try to build a tower to Heaven (the Tower of Babel). Of course, they never reach Heaven, because access to Heaven can only be granted by God. For this, the Babylonians are ultimately punished for their blasphemy and attempt to attain divine dominion on their own terms, rather than on God's. The overall thematic arc of Babylon mirrors this story, but as it applies to art and cinema itself.

At the beginning of the film, all of the main characters share the same goal of "doing something bigger". Thus, they chase the dream of becoming powerful movie stars, producers, or musicians and begin building to reach their personal idea of Heaven. However, their tower is not built on the love of the art. It's built on self-aggrandizement, excess, and moral decadence to achieve the escapism, stimulation, love, and praise they desire. The tower keeps them at the top for only a little, but eventually it comes crashing down. Robbie's Nellie LaRoy is egotistical, obsessed with quick thrills and stimulation, and wants to do things on her terms always, no matter the treachery such a life requires. Pitt's Jack Conrad claims to care about the art and progress of cinema, but when it moves on without him, gone is his view that what he did in life mattered, and, to him, his existence becomes meaningless. Calva's Manny is chasing many of the same superficial things, but primarily chasing superficial love with a beautiful woman who doesn't even know what love is. Their climb to these factitious idealized versions of Heaven, fame, fortune, ect, are ultimately their downfalls. The characters in this story are the Babylonians, their misguided ambitions is their tower to Heaven, and the Higher Power that takes the tower down and punishes them is cinema and art itself.

Cinema is bigger than any one person and the industry will chew you up and spit you out if you don't realize that. Cinema lives forever. Art lives forever. People live and then they die. It's no coincidence that the only character who gets a happy ending is Jovan Adepo's Sidney Palmer who gets to live out his days happily playing jazz music at a small club, away from the exploitation and excess of the industry.

This message beautifully culminates in the film's touching final moments. Manny revisits Los Angeles with his family after many years away. He has been living a modest, average life. He goes into the movie theater and, after an audacious creative montage that should make any cinephile smile with glee, both the audience and Manny come to realize what Sidney Palmer and critic Elinor St. John (played by Jean Smart) had years before. The "something bigger" the characters were chasing wasn't a lifestyle. It was cinema itself. Manny finally realizes that, despite the horror that occurred, he, Nelly, and Conrad, achieved their overarching dream of doing something bigger by contributing to filmmaking. Now, when anyone watches a clip from one of their movies, they will "be alive again" and will "dance with angels and ghosts" forever.

Some critics have complained that the film's view of cinema is far too cynical, but I think, in its own way, it's kind of hopeful. It's not always pretty, but it's honest. The film simply rips the industry off its pedestal and simultaneously bolsters the art-form of cinema upwards. Thematically, despite the course and unflinching narrative of the movie, Babylon has the purest message about filmmaking I've ever seen on screen.

9.9 / 10.
57 out of 100 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twin Peaks: Lonely Souls (1990)
Season 2, Episode 7
10/10
The Greatest Episode in Television History
2 July 2022
Every great TV show has a few episodes that transcends the series itself - episodes that are quintessential, not only to the show's plot, but to illustrating what makes the show click. These episodes are what comes to mind whenever you think about the show, even long after you've finished it.

There have been many of these episodes across television history. Take Breaking Bad's "Ozymandias" or "Faceoff", The Wire's "-30-" or "Middle Ground", Mash's "Goodbye, Farewell and Amen", South Park's "Scott Tenorman Must Die", The Office's "Stress Relief" and "Casino Night", Game of Throne's "The Battle" etc etc etc. Twin Peak's "Beyond Life and Death" could very well be put on this list. However, in my eyes, one episode stands above the rest: Twin Peak's "Lonely Souls"

This episode is (almost) without a doubt the quintessential Twin Peaks episode. For starters, it is the perfect blend between the show's domineering styles. Just like the entirety of the seires, the episode is surreal, mysterious, suspenseful, and tragic. It even manages to throw some humor in the mix, really demonstrating the show in its genre-bending glory. Furthermore, the atmosphere of Twin Peaks is certainly one of its best qualities, and "Lonely Souls" really shows off the just how haunting, ominous, and dreamy / nightmarish the show's atmosphere could be. This is aided by David Lynch's fabulous camera movements and shots (the log lady walking into the police department and the Roadhouses' sign illuminated in the puddle of mud are among the the show's most iconic shots), and its music. Julee Cruise' unforgettable appearance in this episode does not at all feel like an attempt from Lynch to promote his music, as it perfectly helps in instilling the episode's emotions in the audience, as well as allowing us to completely sink into the atmosphere. "The World Spins" is the perfect choice to close the episode too, as it compliments the theme of the cycle of abuse and trauma that the episode so fervently demonstrates.

Other than perfectly illustrating what makes the show so fantastic throughout, the main reason why the episode is perhaps the greatest in television history is the rich emotions. A growing sense of dread and grief is introduced from the very start, as we learn of a troubling suicide. After giving the audience a small break from the dread with the Bobby and Nadine subplots, we are swung head-first back into the suspense and horror. The episode is unbelievably impressive in how it somehow makes the audience vaguely feel as if something horrible is about to happen, matching the exact emotion the characters themselves feel.

When the horrid moment that we sub-consciously feared does transpire, it is truly one of the most shocking and disturbing reveals I have ever seen. The first time I watched the episode, my mouth stood wide agape as I realized my emotions had been ingeniously manipulated throughout the entire series just for this moment to appear all the more horrifying and discomforting. The scene in question isn't even that graphic to today's standards, yet it feels more horrifically disturbing, soul-crushing, and brutal than most anything you'll see on TV. This is due to the tragedy that the scene is seeped in, as we realize that the horrible and painful cycle will continue, despite all the characters had done to try to prevent it.

The closing moments of the episode are especially heart-rending and beautiful, as we see the grief of the event wash over the character's subconscious.

No episode has ever touched me so deeply. It's a tear-jerking episode that sends chills up and down my spine seemingly every other second. It's the most powerful, goosebump-inducing, and, most of all, haunting episode I have ever seen.

10 / 10.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Web of Nostalgia
24 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
SPIDER-MAN.

The name alone conjures up countless images, themes, and ideas. However, those ideas seem to vary depending on who you are talking to. With 3 widely different cinematic portrayals of the famed wall-crawler, there is no objective answer on how the character should be portrayed. However, when news began circulating about a possible team-up between the 3 Spider-Men, anticipation soared. Once the trailers showcased the return of previous cinematic Spidey villains, every Spider-Man fan completely bought in. What was once rumors and speculation about a Spider-Man alliance between Tobey Maguire, Andrew Garfield, and Tom Holland, had turned into expectations, and oh boy, were expectations high. Now that the film has released, does it live up to expectations? Does it accomplish the near-impossible task of satisfying all 3 fanbases while still delivering an enjoyable story? For the most part... yes!

Jon Watts and the MCU's take on Spider-Man is not one I have been abundantly fond of up to this point. Homecoming was downright bold in its mediocrity, and while I enjoy No Way Home and think it was a step in the right direction, I can't say that Tom Holland's portrayal of Peter Parker ever felt right to me. This is not the Tom Holland's fault, as I think he is great fit for the role. The stories that he was put in simply were not fulfilling for a super-fan of Sam Raimi's original trilogy. I am of the opinion that Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 1 & 2 are among the greatest action movies in cinematic history. They are grand, operatic, emotional, relatable, and blissfully stylistic films full of rich drama, themes, and character development. To me, the original trilogy is the gold standard for Spider-Man / superhero movies. They weren't just great superhero movies... they were great movies (Spider-Man 3 is included in that testament too; even if to a lesser extent). I am certainly more a fan of cinema than of Spider-Man, so naturally I am going to prefer great filmmaking and directorial style over MCU-shared-universe episodic adventures (even if they are fun and enjoyable).

With my anticipation through the roof as I walked into the theater, fear still scratched in the back of my mind. Unfortunately, the first quarter of No Way Home confirmed that fear. The start of No Way Home is jarringly fast-paced. We are given almost no time to breathe as one plot point rushes to the next without giving us proper time to completely emotionally connect with what is happening. The comedy is also extremely overbearing in this section of the film. It's that same cookie-cutter MCU comedy that we're all used to by this point. This section of the film also contains my least favorite scene in the whole movie. The scene is question is when Peter goes to Dr. Strange in an attempt to convince him to cast a spell that will make the world forget that Peter Parker is Spider-Man. When Dr. Strange begins casting the spell, it all goes wrong, and he has to "contain" it before it is expelled. This is all fine, but the execution is where this scene falls terribly flat. First, Dr. Strange behaves incredibly bizarre and uncharacteristically in this scene. Next, the comedy is at its most forced and annoying. Finally, the way that the spell gets botched is very lazy and is also played for jokes. This scene should be absolutely vital, as it throws the rest of the plot into action. Instead, it's rushed and poorly executed.

Thankfully, the film has an immediate spark in quality following that scene. The reintroduction of Doc Ock and Green Goblin is blissfully cinematic. It's difficult to contain your excitement once Alfred Molina recites his famous "Sun in the palm of my hand" line, or jump out of your chair when William Dafoe's animated cackle booms from off-screen and that pumpkin bomb rolls across the cement. The fight itself between Spidey and Doc Ock is decent too, though I wish we could've seen a confrontation with Goblin on the bridge, instead of Spider-Man and Doc Ock randomly teleporting to Strange's lair; cutting off the bloodline of a scene that was just starting to heat up.

The returning villains are all handled very competently by the filmmakers and their performers. They fit nicely into the tone of this particular film, but do not deviate from who they are in their original movies. Some of the clunky dialogue written for them can sound a bit cartoonish and out of place, but the actors pull them off as well as they could. William Dafoe gives the standout performance from the villain cast, returning to the Goblin character as flawlessly as he had left him. I will say that fans of The Amazing Spider-Man movies may not be as pleased with this film's portrayal of their villains. Lizard and Electro both feel like completely different characters than they were in the 2 Amazing Spider-Man movies. Lizard is basically a satirical version of his original self and Electro is much cooler than the awkward mess that was Max Dillon in Amazing Spider-Man 2. I happen to think that the latter benefits No Way Home, while the former hurts it just slightly.

The film goes on this pace until we hit a dramatic shifting point in the story; Aunt May's death. This is where the movie takes a turn from an average / mediocre MCU movie to something a little above and beyond. While I have never been a fan of the MCU's gimmicky version of Aunt May, her death is undoubtedly what the film needed to bring some well needed drama into the story, pushing the overbearing comedy out for good. For me, this is the first moment of the Holland era that has actually felt like it carried any substantial emotional weight. Holland's performance during and after her death is powerful, and it's the type of emotional gravity that I expect from a Spider-Man movie.

Now... let's get to the most exhilarating part of the No Way Home experience. The 3 cinematic versions of Spider-Man coming together. Even though we were all expecting it, there probably wasn't a person watching who didn't have a huge smile on their face as Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire came through those portals.

Let's get to what makes this dynamic between the 3 Spider-Men work so well. First off, Andrew Garfield might be the highlight of this movie. While I have never been profusely fond of the Marc Webb Spider-Man movies, I've always respected Garfield as an actor. Here, he's finally given the right script that he can truly shine in. He plays a jaded Peter Parker who has been completely consumed by his life as Spider-Man. Haunted with grief, Peter Parker is but a ghost to him. Garfield gives a performance with a great deal emotional weight, while also delivering on an abundance of infectious quirk. Tobey Maguire also does a fantastic job. His Peter is now an older, wiser, and sweeter presence. He's finally learned to overcome his darkness and to balance his life as Peter Parker and as Spider-Man. He's been through much of the same grief as Garfield's Spidey, but after a great deal suffering and struggle, he's come through on the other side a better man. However, in contrast to those two, Holland's Peter Parker is only at the beginning of his journey and is just starting to experience the grief that the other two Peter's have already gone through. Maguire and Garfield's Spider-Men know the possible darkness that Holland's Spidey could embark on if they don't steer him the right direction... if they don't steer him to embracing the core message of Spider-Man: Responsibility. This compelling dynamic, as well as the gold interactions between the 3, is what makes their team-up the best thing that No Way Home has going for it.

The resolution of this film is also fantastic. Peter makes the sacrifice of making everyone forget Peter Parker. This is the best thing for this character. The Watts' Spider-Man era has been bogged down by its integral ties to the MCU. Without this, we can finally have a character that feels like Spider-Man instead of Iron Boy Jr. The final scene of Peter renting a crappy apartment and swinging out into a snowy New York feels like classic Spider-Man through and through out.

Upon watching No Way Home, the realization that Watts' Spider-Man trilogy acts as one elongated origin story comes to light. Sure, the previous two films might have been more compelling if Peter had learned about responsibility. But, the origin's conclusion in No Way Home is also what makes feel all the more meaningful and important.

Despite the many things that I loved about the movie, it is definitely not as perfect as many MCU enthusiasts have claimed. One of my big gripes with the movie that I am yet to mention is the lack of directorial style. I don't mean to harp on Jon Watts too much, but you don't really feel his distinct fingerprint on the movie that often. Stylistically, it pretty much blends in with the rest of the MCU. Visually, the movie is plain out boring to look at when it should be vibrant with visual flair and style. The action sequences are nothing too spectacular either. While the action is this movie is not boring or anything, it is certainly not as exhilarating or creative as it should be. The same can be said for the web-swinging in the movie. Finally, despite some emotion being brought on the table, it just lacks the soul and relatability of the original trilogy.

Spider-Man: No Way Home is a little messy and not without its flaws. However, despite all the holes you may be able to pick in it, you can't really deny that it's a really fun adventure that gets a lot right. Most impressively, they accomplished the task of creating a true cultural moment by bringing all 3 live action Spider-Men together... and making it really work marvelously. No Way Home may not be perfect, but I'm happy to congratulate the filmmakers who achieved such an ambitious feat. No Way Home is grand, fun, enjoyable, and the best of the Holland Spider-Man films.

8.5 - 8.9 / 10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Substandard At Best
3 April 2021
Borat Subsequent Moviefilm or (Delivery of Prodigious Bribe to American Regime for Make Benefit Once Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan) is the follow up film to the classic 2006 comedy mockumentary Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan. Yeah, the titles are pretty humorous in themselves. The first Borat movie has to one of the funniest movies I've ever seen. It's hugely offensive yet rarely too in your face. It is also able to pack a subtle yet effective message about how America (and other countries to be fair) unfairly treat those who come from different cultures. However, Borat (2006) is first and for most a comedy film. The joke-per-minute ratio of that movie is insane and the fact that most of the jokes land make it that much better. When I heard that a sequel to this movie was coming out, I was both excited and skeptical. Since the character of Borat is so well known, it was going to be much harder to prank unsuspecting people. Add that to the fact that everyone is used to being recorded and are more cautious of what they say on camera than they were in 2006. However, I was still anticipating the release. Unfortunately, my doubts were somewhat proved right when I watched the film. It's not the worst thing in the world or anything, but it is far from even getting close to living up to the original. I doubt I'll think about it too much in the future.

Borat Subsequent Moviefilm suffers from many things that are almost unavoidable. To avoid everyone recognizing him, Borat is dressed in a disguise for a lot of the movie. To me, this takes away some of the magic from the character. Also, as many suspected, the reactions just aren't as funny or shocking.

Plot-wise, the film is mostly catastrophic mess. It almost has no plot. It honestly feels more like a collection of skits tied together by a thin string rather than any semblance of a concise or compelling narrative.

The inclusion of Borat's daughter could have interesting, but her scenes fall flat the majority of the time. While the two leads do have a couple of clever moments, there was an endless amount of cheesy, hammed fisted "emotional" scenes between the two that just get on your nerves at a certain point.

Finally, let's talk about the jokes and the pranks. Comedically, the movie is hit or miss. At best, the jokes land like a good boxer's left hook in one of his last fights before retirement. At worst, the jokes hit like the 9th batter on a recreational baseball team.

Although I admittedly laughed during the film... there was also a lot of sitting in silence... more sitting in silence unfortunately. A lot of that comes down to the fact that almost everything is so incredibly in your face. Sometimes it feels as if the filmmakers are on their knees begging you to laugh.

Speaking of begging, let's talk about the lengths the filmmakers would go to try to make it look like certain reactions were crazier than they actually were. To be honest, it is pretty off-putting and it kind of reveals a layer of hypocrisy too. On one hand, the filmmakers are constantly attacking politicians and those in power who lie and spread falsities to promote their agenda. Simultaneously however, the filmmakers edit and contextualize numerous clips to their own benefit. Now, in absolutely no way am I implying that politicians who spread hate and lie (especially about a pandemic) is on the same level as a comedy film with political themes that reshapes reactions. With that being said, it is still a flaw within the film nonetheless, and it lends itself to the overarching flaw of the content being forced.

I don't want it to sound like I completely loathe this movie. Although most of the movie was somewhat painful to get through, there were stretches of it where it seemed to pick up the pace a bit. Example being, the reveal at the end of the movie is definitely a highlight I enjoyed. Add to that, Sacha Baron Cohen is still great as Borat, even if the writing is a huge step down from the first film.

My favorite part of the movie might be the non-actor Jeanise Jones. A lot of my favorite parts within the movie were centered around her, and I think a lot of people are agreeing with me after seeing the overall positive reaction to her after the release. Also Cohen donated 100,000 dollars to her church. Very naiiiice!

All in all, Borat: Subsequent Moviefilm is a very disappointing movie. Sadly, it's a movie with no subtlety, whether it be for it's themes or its jokes. Messy, unfocused, inconsistent in quality, and felt like it was written by people who just threw every idea at the wall and hoped that some of it stuck. Even if a few things here and there did stick, it doesn't make up for all the trash on the ground that bounced off the wall.

In conclusion, Borat: Subsequent Moviefilm is not a complete disaster, but still a disaster nonetheless. Despite its nice heart and a few clever setups, it's glaring flaws keep it from being considered anything but a disappointing return for such an iconic character. I just don't think Borat: Subsequent Moviefilm needed to be made and it never did anything to convince me otherwise.

Substandard at best.

4.5 - 5.0.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mank (2020)
6/10
Impressive but unfulfilling
6 December 2020
Mank was definitely my most anticipated movie of the year. David Fincher is one of favorite directors of all time. Any movie that he makes, I'm gonna be watching. The concept of the film sounded deeply interesting too. A David Fincher movie about the creation of the most influential movie ever made and starring Gary Oldman. It was also made in the style of a 40s movie. Sounds amazing. However, while Mank definitely had some positive qualities, all in all, it was a bit disappointing.

Let's start with the good. From a technical standpoint, the movie is phenomenal. The beautiful and creative cinematography, the immaculate editing, the set design, the costumes are all utterly astounding. We should expect no less from Fincher at this point who has consistently proven to be masterful at technical achievements.

Gary Oldman also gives a great performance. He completely disappears into the role, and it's not hard to forget that it's Gary Oldman who is playing Mankiewicz.

The movie is also very unique, surprising, and ambitious. However, I'm afraid it's one of those movies that you can more appreciate than actually like.

The movie feels inconsequential and insignificant a lot of the time. I love dialogue heavy movies (when done right), but some of the scenes in this movie just get downright tedious. The film's pace is, for lack of a better word, a bit meandering. The movie gets more and more repetitive as it goes on.

Being a big fan of Citizen Kane, I did enjoy the scenes of him writing the movie. But at the end of the day, did I learn anything THAT interesting about the making of the movie? No. Was I thoroughly invested in everything that was going on. Unfortunately not.

Add to that, the film also can get incredibly confusing, as it assumes the audience has knowledge of this era's film industry and politics. A lot of the time, I just didn't care because the film never really communicated to me why I should care. This can make some of the movie feel emotionally shallow.

However, I did love the stylistic concept of it all. It was a good love letter to the golden age of Hollywood. Also, the ways in which the movie replicates the structure of Citizen Kane... while talking about the structure of Citizen Kane, is brilliant.

This movie is commendable, bold, and utterly impressive in many ways, but it's not enough to save this movie from feeling like a disappointment. At the end of the day, it's a movie I can respect more than actually enjoy.

6.9 / 10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A beautiful & unique meditation on loneliness & regret
15 November 2020
Charlie Kaufman's new film "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" stars Jesse Plemons as Jake and Jessie Buckley as "The Young Women". The movie has been polarizing to say the least. Some of called it a strange, nonsensical and self indulgent mess, while others, such as myself, have called it the best movie of the year so far. While the movie is undoubtedly strange, on a second viewing I think many will understand that the complex puzzle that is this movie isn't unsolvable. During my first viewing, I was mostly confused. However the message of it all didn't make sense until after the credits started rolling. I knew that his movie would be a grower (as somewhat of a revelation towards the end of the film will change your entire perception of the movie). Not too long after my first viewing, I re-watched it and completely loved it. "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" is a resoundingly ambitious yet small scale art house film, that has you pondering throughout. The themes of loneliness, regret, fantasy, escapism, and time passing through people, really weave their way into your emotions and brain, as Kaufman delivers one of his most thought provoking films to date. Heck, he even throws in some themes of the impact of art/cinema while he's at it. It has been a while since I have watched a modern movie (that has gotten moderate attention) has had this much to say. The plot of the movie would be hard to explain to someone, as it means multiple different things on separate viewings. The movie has the audience questioning what's real and fake. When it unravels completely and connects the puzzle pieces together, the message of the movie is 10 times more powerful. It is a unique movie. It's unarguably strange and perplexing, but it is all for the themes that Kaufman is trying to convey. The actors all give very good performances as well. Jesse Plemons gives the most memorable performance of his career so far as Jake. Jessie Buckley, Toni Collette, and David Thewlis also all give quality performances. I also loved the gorgeous cinematography and images in the movie. This is a good trait of many of Kaufman's movies, but I think this may be Kaufman's best looking film. The score by Jake Wadley is also remarkably elegant and I'm hoping for a Oscar nomination for the score at least. I don't think the movie is perfect however. The film is very dialogue heavy, and while most of these conversations are very well written, introspective, and thought provoking, some just don't resonate as well (and go for a bit too long). There is also a scene or two that I think could've probably been executed better. The last 'problem' I can think of is honestly not really a flaw, but it might be for some people so I'll just say it. That 'flaw' is that the movie isn't nearly as enjoyable on the first viewing. It's fascinating, but since you are most likely confused a lot of the time, it can feel pointless and convoluted. Due to the fact that you are somewhat ambiguous to what's happening (until the end), it's not as effective. That last one all changes on a second viewing however. All in all however, "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" is a resoundingly audacious meditation that many will love and many will hate. It's both beautiful and poignant, while being dark, unsettling, and crushingly depressing. While not a perfect movie, it is one that is unique and will sit as a gem for cinema in 2020. 9.0/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
365 Days (2020)
1/10
The worst movie ever made.
15 November 2020
This film is utterly degrading, pathetic, and offensive. It's shocking a movie this backwards and twisted was ever able to get made, let alone released. Netflix should be ashamed of themselves as well as anyone who was involved in the making of this travesty. The fact that this got to number 1 makes me sick. This movie is sickening. The worst movie ever made, I'd rather watch "The Room" a million times.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tenet (2020)
7/10
Breathtaking, if not a bit empty
20 September 2020
Tenet is the new film by accomplished filmmaker Christopher Nolan, starring John David Washington, Robert Pattinson, Elizabeth Debicki, and Kenneth Branagh. I would usually give some kind of spoiler free plot synopsis before reviewing, but for Tenet that seems near impossible without A) going on for too long or B) spoiling something from the movie. The film is beyond intricately woven, as Christopher Nolan is going all out on his trademark extremely complex, plot heavy style. Conceptually, it was fascinating and the film-making itself was utterly breathtaking. The scale to this movie is truly amazing, with multiple sequences throughout the film being completely thrilling and spectacular. Nolan used every dollar from that gargantuan 205 million dollar budget with great care. With Tenet, Nolan once again proves he is one of the most daring, bold, and ambitious filmmakers working today. However, that doesn't make a film great... and Tenet is no exception. It's good, it kept my attention, but as a whole it felt a bit detached. This is an issue I've had with many Nolan films, but with Tenet I would say it's Nolan's biggest offender of lack of authentic emotion. This is all down to the thinly written characters and the unavoidably small amount you care for them. While the performances are all solid, the characters aren't given that many unique traits about them. The main character is simply called "The Protagonist" and it is ironically fitting for a character who's only purpose is to seemingly be the "good guy." He doesn't even get a proper introduction. I guess if I had to describe him, he is sort of a James Bond esque type, but that's not too original anyways. John David Washington does just about the best he can with the material, but unfortunately that just isn't that much. Robert Pattison's character "Neil" is also not given much complexity, but his character is a bit more memorable in my opinion, but maybe that's just down to Pattinson's natural charm. The only character you really feel emotionally attached to is "Kat" played by Elizabeth Debicki. However, I think this is probably more down to the sympathetic events surrounding her. I will say that the villain played by Kenneth Branagh is likely the most memorable character just due to the pure ferocity Branagh brings to the screen here. His ambitions do border on, for lack of a better word, cartoonish though. Now to be clear, I don't hate these characters... I just feel no attachment to them. This lack of strong character development makes the movie somewhat emotionless. The film also doesn't always execute exposition very successfully as Tenet is a lot of the time, unnecessarily hard to follow and convoluted. The film would be a lot more investing if Nolan would allow the audience to be let into the basics of the plot. Sometimes this works to great effect however, as Tenet's many audacious reveals are simply brilliant. All in all though, I enjoyed Tenet. I was constantly stunned by the incredible film-making and scale. Even if the character's weren't great, the complete complexity and ambition of the plot begs for a second watch. Tenet is a new experience and a stunning and boldly unique ride, even for its glaring flaws. I will probably watch it again one day, and it might be one of those movies that gets better each time you watch it (like a lot of Nolan's movies). Will those fundamental flaws disappear on a second watch however? Probably not. Tenet is a hard movie to review, because there is truly a lot of amazing things within this movie and it is a unique, audacious experience.... but there is also a lot of things to roll your eyes at as well. 8.0/10
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Taxi Driver (1976)
10/10
Martin Scorsese's Hypnotic, Paranoia Fueled Masterpiece
29 June 2020
Taxi Driver is one of the most acclaimed movies ever made. The 1976 Martin Scorsese Masterpiece is as studied and reveled today as it ever was and for good reason. Taxi Driver is one of the greatest movies I've ever seen and the hypnotic story of a man losing his grip on sanity is truly one of the most captivating movies ever made.

The movie itself is a study. It is obviously a "character study" but the film itself is a synopsis of the human psyche, rage, hypocrisy, melancholy, loneliness, obsession with violence, and its glorification in the media. This is all seen through the jaded lens of anti-hero Travis Bickle played in incredible fashion by Robert De Niro. De Niro's mesmerizing performance is truly one of the best ever put to screen. It is captivating in every sense of the word. He captures the essence of the character and makes Travis Bickle all the more enthralling, and for a film like this that is more than essential.

This movie draws you in like no other. From Bernard Herman's score, to the mesmeric editing, to Scorsese's masterful direction, this movie forces you to relate to this deeply troubled character. The movie is so hypnotic that much of the film you want to look away, but to turn your head for a second would be near impossible. That's how much this movie's atmosphere takes you in, it is top notch in that.

The movie showcases Travis' destructive attempt to escape his own isolation, social incapability, and to achieve self imposed vigilantism. The movie is a slow burning stick of dynamite, burning with flames paranoia and alienation until it explodes in one of the fieriest and explosive climax's in cinematic history. The movie isn't really about Travis' war on the inhumane pimps, it is about delusion, rage, social detachment, paranoia, obsession, violence, and how it can drive a man crazy.

The resolution to this movie is also really fascinating. Its meaning has been the source for many discussions but the reason I love it so much is how it plays off the rest of the film. I quote no other than screenwriter of the movie Paul Schradar himself, "I've always felt that the last frame can be spliced to the first frame and the movie started all over again." Pure genius.

This movie is really incredible and it just gets better each time you watch it. I truly recommend this film. The famous quote from the movie is "You talkin' to me? Well I'm the only one here." In Travis' case he couldn't be more right. "I'm the only one here."
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Da 5 Bloods (2020)
7/10
A Mixed Bag (yet still compelling)
21 June 2020
Da 5 Bloods is the new movie by director Spike Lee. The film has been very divisive since its release as I've seen some people claiming it as the best film of the year, and others claiming it is just plain pretentious schlock. Me, I would fall into around the middle of these two, feeling just a bit more positive to the movie, but not loving it. The movie is about 4 Vietnam veterans as they go back to find the gold they hid so many years ago. They also go back to find the body of their old friend (Stormin' Norman) who was killed in the war. The film explores themes of racism in the Vietnam war, and much more social commentary within it as well. I will say that this might be Spike Lee's most ambitious movie as it delves into so many themes and different genres. However, the movie falls under its own ambition far too much. Due to how many things Lee is trying to do, some of it feels very unfocused and jumbled together. The first half of this movie is another thing people are really criticizing as well. I actually enjoyed the first half to a certain extent, but it is extremely heavy handed and it was frustrating that Lee felt the need to tell us everything the characters were feeling and every message he wanted the audience to receive. It's not even really a case of a movie "telling not showing" because here the movie is doing both. It's showing us enough for us to understand the characters and the themes but it decides to add a unneeded monologues that explains it to us. The first half of the movie does set up quite well for the second half. For the most part I do think the protagonist are pretty good. Two of the main 4 protagonist however are kind of underwritten (Eddie and Melvin). They are given minimal character qualities...especially Eddie. However, Otis and Paul were very interesting the whole way through, especially Paul played in glorious fashion by Delroy Lindo. Even though there hasn't been very many movies to release in 2020, so far as of June 2020 Delroy Lindo is my choice for best performance of the year. He dominates every second of his screen time and Lee uses this great performance to his advantage and it is a real reoccurring highlight in the movie. I also really like Clarke Peters' performance as Otis. One thing that kind of annoyed me however is that the characters don't always react naturally to some events that happen in the film. The scene that kickstarts the second half of the movie (I won't spoil it but if you've seen it you probably know the one I mean) should've gotten a bigger reaction from the characters but they never really mention it after the sequence is over. This happens to a smaller extent multiple times within the film as well. I have been criticizing it a lot so far, but there is definitely a lot to like in this movie. I really like the second half of the movie for the most part. It ramps up the intensity to full volume and we lose the heavy handiness from the first half. There is also an extremely touching scene towards the end with Chadwick Boseman's character (Stromin' Norman) and Delroy Lindo's character (Paul). The scene is pretty beautiful and I've already found myself rewatching that one scene. That's another thing that's really good about the movie, just Chadwick Boseman in general. They hype up the character of Norman a lot, and his performance makes us believe why they were so connected to him. Towards the end we also just start getting a lot of really good scenes. The climax I do find to be really generic. The antagonist who is revealed towards the end is just plain cartoonish. The resolution I find to be okay. It's not bad but I wasn't completely satisfied or anything. By the end of the film I was just kind of mixed. I liked a lot of things about it as I was interested in most of the film. I also really liked the thought provoking themes (even if they were a bit heavy handed). However, there is a lot holding this movie back. It feels decently unfocused most of the way through, and at times feels like multiple genres and multiple movies at the same time. I don't know exactly what to feel about this movie as I think I like the movie enough, but it's frustrating to see what could've been a great movie just turn out kind of decent. 7.5/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Parasite (2019)
9/10
An Instant Classic
21 June 2020
Parasite directed by Bong Joon Ho has become instantly ingrained into film culture already. It became the first foreign film to win best picture and for good reason. Parasite is one of the most original movies I've seen in a long time. From the jaw dropping suspense, to the social commentary, the one word I have for this movie is meticulous. The film follows the poor Kim family as they hatch a scheme to infiltrate the very wealthy Park family. The concept is simple enough, but the story both subverts and exceeds your expectations as the plot snowballs out of control. The movie is a showcase at building suspense. As the movie goes on the tension grows higher and higher until we get the payoff in the climax. The movie's script is just so great! The characters are written profoundly and every scene means something to all the characters, the themes and the story. The cinematography in this is also really great. Another thing that really stands out is the messaging and how it is conveyed. The audience is treated with the upmost respect from director Bong Joon Ho as he never is heavy handed delivering this social theme. The theme is conveyed is symbolism and metaphors and it works amazingly. I really loved Parasite and it is probably a close second for my favorite movie of the year after The Irishman. It is definitely somewhere in my top 15 favorite movies of the decade if not too 10. The movie is extremely creative, original, and meticulously created. I'm happy to say that Parasite stands amongst some of the greatest foreign films ever made. 9.5/10
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magnolia (1999)
10/10
Magnolia - The Most Human Film Ever Made
19 June 2020
Human emotions are complex. They're messy, hard to explain, hard to talk about. They're an ocean of chemicals swirling inside you telling you how to feel, what to think, and how to act. Merely deciphering them can be difficult, which is why translating them into art in a truly authentic and universal way is a rare occurrence. Nonetheless, many of cinema's greatest dramas have done this, but none have identified humanity like Paul Thomas Anderson's Magnolia.

Magnolia is one of the finest films of the 1990s and, in my opinion, of all time. It is an epic mosaic of interrelated characters traveling through coincidence, fate, parental neglect, forgiveness, regret, and divine intervention. A film that delves into themes this dramatic risks feeling pretentious, but Magnolia never unscrews its emotional hook on the viewer. Not even close.

Managing to be both intimate and magniloquent, the film, despite its intricate plotlines, never strays from the human heart. Every pumping moment is spent analyzing this colorful cast of wildly different, but, at their core, very similar, characters as they each go through breakdowns and spiritual revelations.

Magnolia's most common theme is the impact of parental neglect. This ties into the broader idea of one's past traumas haunting them until they are forced to destroy the mental barricades that have kept them from moving on. Thematically, the ideological debate of coincidence versus fate is established in the opening scene and resolved in the film's famous climax. The themes of forgiveness and redemption are also very prominent, but are wisely left for the viewer to interpret for themselves based on their own beliefs. At the end of the film, John C. Reilly's character, Officer Jim Kurring, asks himself "What can we forgive?" This question refers to both the forgiveness of others and to self-forgiveness.

Every theme the film explores is executed with mastery. However, it is the strength of the performances that deliver these themes with such power. A star-studded cast gives unforgettable, and sometimes, career-topping performances. In particular, Tom Cruise and John C. Reilly perform like their careers depend on it. Nuanced and realistically flawed, watching these characters for three hours is an emotional roller coaster.

For all the objective qualities that help make Magnolia a masterwork, it's the subjective connection to emotion and humanity that make it one of my all-time favorites. The film's emotions pour out like a trembling flood, serving to both drown and cleanse the characters, as well as the viewer. The movie breaks your heart and slowly pieces it back together again, resulting in an almost therapeutic viewing experience.

Magnolia, simply put, understands humans. A supremely vulnerable story that is empathetic in all regards, viewing these flawed and damaged people as just that... people. It sees these characters as individual magnolia petals, delicate and easily torn, but all part of the same encompassing root that is the human experience. No movie has ever truly captured my perception of human life like Magnolia.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Irishman (2019)
9/10
Scorsese returns with thought provoking classic
18 March 2020
Martin Scorsese is, for good reason, one of the most treasured filmmakers in cinematic history. He has a barrage of classic films and he influenced countless. Once I heard he was making a new mob epic, I was ecstatic. However, many (including myself) did have a worry about the film itching in the back of our heads going in. Many feared that this movie be Scorsese trying to relive in gangster classics like Goodfellas and Casino. Though, When I watched it, all those worries were completely blown out of the water. The Irishman is one of Martin Scorsese's best movies.

The cast is phenomenal. Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino all give the best performances they have given in a long time. The Irishman is also extremely entertaining, so don't let that 3 in a half hour run time scare you. I really don't think a minute is wasted in this film. The filmmakers just had a lot to say. The Irishman is of course a gangster epic, but it is far different than something like Goodfellas. I have never seen Scorsese this vulnerable. This movie is far more intimate, personal, and meditative than Scorsese's other gangster movies. It burns slower, taking its time to meticulously build the themes. The film obviously features much about the mafia, but this is the most I've ever seen Scorsese really dive this deep into the emotional consequences of a life of crime, such as the one Frank Sheeran lives in this movie. The third act of this movie is incredible and other than the movie Silence, I have never been this emotionally impacted by a Scorsese movie.

This is my fifth favorite Scorsese movie, and it's good to know Scorsese is still at the top of his game. 9.5/10
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My Favorite Movie of All Time
3 September 2019
I have been enthralled with the art of film since I was a little boy. There are plenty of movies that first got me hooked to the art form, but Raiders of the Lost Ark is the film that first conjured my fascination for cinema. For that, how could I not call this my favorite movie of all time? It has drastically changed my life.

However, my endless love for this movie is not just due to nostalgia and personal importance (even though personal importance is obviously an important factor when considering your subjective favorite film). At the end of the day, it is truly no mystery why Raiders has sparked the love for cinema in the hearts of so many. It is a perfect film.

Everything about Raiders is TIMELESS: William's iconic score, the exciting action, the all-time great characters, the performances, the clever dialogue, the enthralling romance, the creative writing, its originality, its innovation, its wit, Spielberg's masterful direction. I could write a full essay analyzing why each one of these things I've listed is phenomenal. Raiders is such a versatile, overachieving, and genre-bending film. It really has something for everyone. Heck, it even finds a way to throw some unforgettable moments of horror into the mix too.

I'll take a moment to talk about the cast. Harrison Ford was born to play this role. Sure, he's great in Star Wars, Witness, Air Force One, The Fugitive, etc etc. However, it is Ford's performance in this film that elevates Indiana Jones from an already great character on paper to the greatest character in cinematic history. If not the greatest, than at least the most memorable and iconic.

Other key performances include Karen Allen with one of action cinema's best love interests, Marion Craine, and Paul Freeman who plays the unforgettable antagonist of Rene Belloq. The latter I find to be a very understated performance, as Belloq is one of my all-time favorite antagonists.

The masterminds behind the story and script of course deserve countless rounds of applause too. Lawrence Kasdan did an absolutely stunning job writing out the already genius story crafted by George Lucas and Phillip Kaufman.

Most importantly, let's talk about Steven Spielberg's directing. It is arguably the best directed movie of all time. Every scene is gushing with Spielberg's distinct directorial style, innovation, and creativity. Most of all, it sticks out to me how organic Spielberg made such an out-there plot feel.

In conclusion, I seriously can't find a single flaw within Raiders of the Lost Ark which is perhaps the only movie in which I can give that testament (When I say "flaws", I mean real flaws that negatively affect the experience of the movie. Just putting that out there before someone points out something like how the map in the background lists countries by their modern names instead of what their name was in 1937).

In conclusion, Raiders of the Lost Ark will likely always be favorite movie. I've rewatched it hundreds of times, and yet, I have an absolute blast every single time I watch it. I expect to have a blast every time I watch it for the rest of my life.

10/10.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Greatest "Dramedy" of All Time
16 April 2019
Stranger Than Fiction starring Will Ferrell, Dustin Hoffman, and Maggie Gyllenhaal, Emma Thompson and directed by Marc Forster is a film that has kind of slipped under the radar for a lot of people. I hadn't even heard of the movie until I saw its trailer on a DVD, but I was immediately intrigued by its super creative concept. Going in, I was expecting an interesting enough Will Ferrell comedy with some funny twists and turns along the way... what I watched instead was one of the most emotionally impactful and thoughtful comedies ever made - a deeply intimate, thought provoking, quirky, and darkly humorous story that might just be the greatest dramedy of all time.

The film about a reserved and lonely man named Harold Crick who wakes up to find a women narrating his life within his mind. We find out this narrator is a famous author writing a book... she plans to kill him in the end of the novel.

The concept itself it brilliantly original and it sucks you in from the very start. However, the concept is not why I love this movie. I love Stranger Than Fiction because it takes said absurd concept and morphs it into an undeniably human story about control, love, life, fate, and responsibility.

This film could've easily been your run of the mill Will Ferrell absurdist comedy, but, instead, it analyzes the humor of the story to make us look at our own lives through the lens of a character who feels deeply human in all aspects. Harold Crick is just an extension and exaggeration of most people's own fears, desires, and regretful contentments. Even though his fate is solidified by the author writing his life into her novel, his fate had already been decided by his fearful and risk-less lifestyle. Crick's thematic arc ultimately makes us contemplate the life we, the audience, lead, but, most importantly inspires us to reach higher and live life to the fullest.

Though I've painted the movie as a mere mediation thus far, it's important to mention that, despite its nuanced themes and dramatic plot-points, Stranger Than Fiction is still a comedy... and a pretty darn funny one at that. Writer Zach Helm delivers clever and witty scenarios and punchlines from start to finish, and I can confidently say that there are no swing and misses in this movie when it comes to the comedy. While it might not be a film that has you clutching your side every other scene or anything to that level, it's still guaranteed to plaster a smile on your face.

A core reason I think that Stranger Than Fiction is the greatest dramedy ever is because one of the main themes of the movie is literally how the tragic and the comedic apply to a person's life. This exploration is a clever commentary on literature, the film itself, and, modern life.

This movie is almost flawless up until the last 15 minutes - funny, surprisingly artistic, and packed with emotion. However, despite the ending of the movie being, overall, very well executed, sweet, and charming in its own right, it still feels like a bit of a compromise considering how powerful the scenes leading up to it are. Ultimately, I feel like the story could've gone in a less safe direction, especially with how daring the movie was (for a fairly mainstream comedy at least) up to that point. Nonetheless, the ending is still very satisfying and clever in its own right, and you could argue it makes the most sense logically.

Stranger Than Fiction is one of the most underrated movies I've ever seen. It has a superbly creative plot and even better execution. Will Ferrell gives, by far, the best performance of his career and proves that exuding huge emotions and character complexity is too in his toolbox as an actor.

This is one of my favorite comedies of all time and I hope you decide to hop into the both humorous and dramatic mediation that is Stranger Than Fiction.

10 / 10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring, unscary, overrated, horror movie has completely decayed with time
10 November 2018
The Blair Witch Project is known for being an extremely influential horror movie. While it is influental(being it created a new sub genre) everything else in this annoying, lethargic, headache of a movie is completely terrible. I'm convinced that the characters in this movie are amongst the worst in horror movie history. They are more than agitating and all they do the whole movie is argue about a map. They just scream and scream and scream at each other and don't stop. It is infuriating to watch them for 1 and a half hours. The story also goes absolutely nowhere. It starts with somewhat of a promise, but when they go into the woods nothing happens for the rest of the movie(until the horrible last 5 minutes) They walk around lost in a forrest and whine(extensively about the map) and that's pretty much it. It is actually documented that the filmmakers ran out of ideas of what to do with the movie while filming and that the actors improvised most of the lines. You can completely tell because all they do for the runtime is have the same conversations over and over again. They just retread the same material repeatedly. While the The Blair Witch Project admittedly had extremely creative marketing, the film itself is awful. The characters run in circles, the ending is a complete bail out, and unfortunately the movie has completely decayed over time.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The most touching, powerful, and important movie ever made.
4 October 2018
When I first watched Schindler's List, I was completely amazed. No movie has ever moved me the way it did, and I don't think ever will. It manages to be both beautiful, horrifying, hopeful, and depressing all at the same time which is incredibly hard to do. With this film, Spielberg really shows what masterful director he is. Liam Neeson also gives a jaw dropping performance as Oskar Schindler. I can say without a doubt that this is one of the greatest acting performances I've ever seen. Every single line, ever single emotion, Liam Neeson acts it out perfectly. The next great performance is what I consider to be the greatest performance of all time: Ralph Fiennes as Amon Goeth. Ralph Fiennes' plays this character so good, that Amon Goeth is arguably the most unlikeable, despicable character to ever appear on screen. (Amon Goeth being a real person makes his performance even more stomach wrenching). This is a once in a generation performance. Ben Kingsley also has an incredible performance in this, playing Itzhak Stern. In my opinion, Schindler's List is the most powerful, emotional and important movie ever made. Schindler's List really is a movie that everyone needs to see. It is truly one of the greatest movies ever. 10/10
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Die Hard (1988)
10/10
One Of Film's Greatest Action Movies
26 May 2018
Die Hard is one of the most entertaining movies I've ever seen. It really is a perfect movie. The characters are incredible. Bruce Willis plays the greatest role he's ever been with the iconic John McClane. John McClane is likable, relatable, and is truly one the best protagonists ever. Alan Rickman has a phenomenal performance playing Hans Gruber. Hans Gruber is one of the best antagonist in any movie ever. He's well spoken, well dressed, calm in demeanor but still incredibly threatening throughout. Alan Rickman steals every scene he's in. Pretty much every character in this movie is extremely memorable from Reginald VelJohnson's Sgt. Al Powell to De'voreaux's Argyle to Bonnie Bedelia's Holly Gennaro/McClane to all the others. The movie is also extremely well written. From the unforgettable dialogue to the clever plot set ups at the beginning of the movie, the script is really amazing. The action is of course incredible with every sequence being astonishing. Other than Raiders of the Lost, Die Hard is the greatest action movie ever to me. Flawless action filmmaking.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed