Change Your Image
![](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTc5NjE0NDM1NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTAxMjY2NjE@._V1_SY100_SX100_.jpg)
puellaincognita
Reviews
Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party (2016)
Breaks through the lies and deceptions of the Democratic party
This film proves that the Democratic party has historically been the party of slavery, racism, opposition to freedom of speech regarding racism and slavery, the party of the Ku Klux Klan, THE adversary of black freedom, citizenship, suffrage and equal rights, author of the Jim Crow laws which kept blacks poor, oppressed and unarmed. It is also the party that fought women's suffrage in the '20's, yet EMBRACED Margaret Sanger, eugenics, forced sterilization, and covert attempts to genocide the black community through sterilization and abortion.
The welfare state was trotted out by Johnson and his cronies as a contemptible offer of chicken feed primarily to beleaguered American blacks, in order to command "the negro vote for 200 years." The Democratic Party's policies in the last 70-80 years have nothing to do with championing the little guy, or true reform, and everything to do with building an army of Americans coerced and deceived into voting for the Democratic party and perpetuating their own serfdom (as they are sold out to special interests). It is a cruel hoax foisted upon black Americans and women in particular. Driven in recent times by the likes of Saul Alinsky, Barack Obama and the Clinton's, it is the party of lies and theft on an unthinkable scale.
We cannot afford another "progressive" presidency. Just to be clear, I am NOT in the tank for the Republican party. I think it has strayed quite a bit and been guilty of corruption and complicity in the destruction of our nation. We can't avoid another neocon presidency, either. Trump, although not perfect, seems a very viable alternative. He's got my vote. He is CLEARLY not a racist or a "hater" of any description. I think he will try to do right by all of us. We've tried the elites and insiders in both parties, and they've carried us to the brink of a cliff. Insanity = doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results. I am deeply distrustful of both parties AND the mainstream media. My candidate, Donald Trump, is hated by all three, which tells me what I need to know. He is for real.
Patterns of Evidence: Exodus (2014)
Fantastic Overview of Evidence for the Exodus
This documentary provides astounding evidence of the events described in the book of Exodus, as well as key events in Genesis. Key events substantiated include:
The existence of Joseph: -A canal which bears his name to this day which was a major achievement of agricultural planning and engineering; -A palatial residence in Goshen, belonging to a high ranking Egyptian official, built over a large Syrian-style home, in a district inhabited by Asiatic/Semitic people; -Joseph's tomb: adjacent to the palatial home, topped with a pyramid, surrounded by 11 other tombs in the same complex. The "Joseph tomb" features architecture reserved for pharaohs, queens, and other extremely high ranking Egyptian officials, contains no Egyptian religious objects, but does have a larger-than-life statue of a man who is portrayed as a northerner/Semitic man with distinct hairstyle and clothing, including the painted remnants of a "coat of many colors."
The existence of a large population of Semitic persons in Egypt, populating the Delta region as the Bible specifies, apparently authorized directly by the pharaoh and/or his administration, comprising a distinct Semitic material culture, presence of herd animals in abundance (shepherd culture), which multiplied rapidly and was initially characterized by prosperity.
Descent of Semitic population into poverty, impoverishment and short life expectancy, consistent with forced servitude.
The occurrence of the Biblical plagues in Egypt, characterized by the sudden decline in Egypt's ability to defend itself, culminating in an effortless takeover by the "Hyksos" or "shepherd kings." An Egyptian document named the Ipuwer Papyrus details, with starting convergence to the Biblical account, a time in which Egypt suffered terrible plagues at the hands of "God" (singular), including thirst due to the Nile becoming "as blood," hunger and destitution in every social class in Egypt, death in every home, lamentation throughout the entire land, AND slaves plundering their former masters, with gold and jewels being worn around the necks of female slaves.
Mahoney then cites archaeological evidence for the conquest of Canaan, in which all the cities claimed to have been destroyed in the book of Joshua, were in fact destroyed in the same exact manner. One striking piece of evidence is a tablet recovered from the ruins of Hazor, which references a king named Jabin--the exact name attributed to the king of Hazor (Jaban) by the book of Exodus! Other amazing correlations are found in the details of the destruction of the city of Jericho.
All of this evidence taken in sum adds up to an exhaustively evidenced and coherent picture of major events described in Genesis, Exodus and the book of Joshua. The evidence is extremely compelling.
The biggest impediment to a complete corroboration of the Biblical accounts is the discrepancies in dating that have plagued modern archaeological attempts to harmonize these events. These issues are complex and knotty, and well over the heads of most viewers, not to mention, very time-consuming to survey. In a rather understated way, Mahoney suggests that his own position is to agree with researchers like David Rohl that what is needed is a radical reassessment of Egyptian chronology. In my own reading and that of my husband, this view is well founded.
Mahoney's goal at the end, it seems to me, is not to champion his own view of the harmonization of biblical accounts, history, and chronology, but to reveal the depth of archaeological evidence for the Exodus, give a brief introduction to varying views on how and where to place this event chronologically, and hope that his film will stimulate further interest, awareness and scholarship on the issue.
I personally support, to my current knowledge on the subject, the redating route. To read more on this, I would recommend the works of Emmanuel Velikovsky: Ramses II and His Time (brilliantly illustrates a lot of the absurdities of conventional Egyptian chronology and dating) and Peoples of the Sea, in which he probes the question of who the Hyksos were. Another great work on the subject of chronological reassessment is Centuries of Darkness by Peter James.
To conclude, I was highly impressed with this film and I can only hope Mahoney will direct a follow-up or even a series of films further probing issues of dating and other side issues of the Exodus. The end of the film was a bit disappointing just because of the lingering uncertainty as to dating with which Mahoney concluded, but I believe this was a very careful and reasonable tone to take with the subject matter. His main points were that there is a plethora of evidence archaeologically for these events occurring as described and that there are many and strong reasons to reassess conventional scholarship in terms of dating these events and even the wider chronologies of Egypt and the Near East. The first point was illustrated very brilliantly and persuasively; the second, I felt, a little less so, mostly due, I believe, to the heady nature of the evidence there and the lack of time to adequately cover such a subject. If this intrigues you, do your own reading!
I also highly recommend the online articles of scholar Alan Montgomery, who has done absolutely brilliant work on Biblical, Egyptian and Near Eastern chronology. His view is that Kenyon's Jericho date of 1550 is indeed valid and that that is when the Conquest occurred, following a 1590 Exodus.
I am thrilled that this documentary was produced and fervently hope that it will spark further debate, scholarship, and confidence on the part of believers of the Biblical accounts!