Here's why re-imaginings are better than stupid sequels.
The re-imaginings: - Battlestar Galactica (beats the original by light years) - Casino Royale (best Bond movie in decades) - Batman Begins (better than any screen-incarnation of the dark knight) - Man of Steel comics (John Byrne's reboot turned an old fashioned series into something hip)
The continuations: - Knight Rider 2000, Knight Rider 2010 (sad) - Superman Returns (worst superhero movie ever) - Star Trek the Next Generation (simply a rape of the original) - Wild Wild West Revisited, More Wild Wild West (hell, even the Wil Smith movie version was better) - Return of the Man from Uncle (pathetic) - I Spy Returns (hell, even the Eddy Murphy movie version was better)
And this list goes on and on, with such marvels as Return of the Six Million Dollar Man and the Bionic Woman 1, 2 & 3 (painfull because Six Million Dollar Man remains my all time favorite series), the three Hulk TV movies, etc.
So what we needed for Knight Rider was a remake or a re-imagining instead of a continuation. Sadly they choose the other road.
Another stupid thing about continuations is that they usually erase any other sequels but the loved ones out of continuity. Richard Hatch at one time wanted to make a continuation of the original Galactica show. At a convention I asked him when his proposed series would have been set, before or after Galactica 80. He said he would have erased G80 from continuity. Superman Returns erases S3 & S4 (and I really liked 'the night the Cylons landed' of G80 and I really liked Superman IV.) No matter how stupid some episodes are (Trek had 'Spock's brain') they were made and aired so if you make a continuation you have no right to erase them.
But that being said, this TV movie beats KR2000 by miles and I never bothered to watch KR2010.
On the bad side, there are plot holes so big that you can hide Jupiter in one of them. Here's an (incomplete) list: - Why didn't Charles Graiman get to KITT when the people of 'the electrical company' got to Ben? - Why didn't Charles Graiman grab a cell phone before he started running so he could call KITT? - How can KITT and the bad guys get from Graiman's place to the place where Sarah is holding a lecture and from there to Vegas in less time than it takes Graiman to reach a phone (booth) or Jennifer's place (a neighbor I presume since I can't see Graiman do 50km by foot.) - How did the bad guys and up at the casino? They lost Sarah and they didn't know about Mike.
The answer to the first 3 questions is simple. If Graiman had gotten to KITT or if he did grab a cell phone or got to a phone booth the movie would not have lasted over 5 minutes! But the third question still puzzles me.
Also on the bad side, is this supposed to be a continuation of Knight Rider or of Viper? And where's the turbo boost? Or the skiing? And is it just me or did Hasselhoff look drunk in his scenes? And why did the green screen effects (scene's inside the car) look so soap-like cheap?
On the bright side, I got used to the car. I got used to the voice (although there was a trailer with another voice ending in "But really, enough about me" and that voice was waaaay better than Kilmer's), I got used to the actors and the characters and I absolutely adored the final scene. I think the most popular thing people remember of the original show was the driving into- and out of the truck. When I saw the final scene I did get the impression that we were in the truck, although it did seem a bit wide. And when finally the ramp opened up I said "Yessss, finally" and felt my eyes getting wet from excitement. What I saw next (and I'm not going to spoil that scene) blew me out of my seat. Now that's a great ending! Too bad the rest of the movie didn't reach that level. Still I'd give that scene a 10. And the whole movie a 4 because of that last scene.
The re-imaginings: - Battlestar Galactica (beats the original by light years) - Casino Royale (best Bond movie in decades) - Batman Begins (better than any screen-incarnation of the dark knight) - Man of Steel comics (John Byrne's reboot turned an old fashioned series into something hip)
The continuations: - Knight Rider 2000, Knight Rider 2010 (sad) - Superman Returns (worst superhero movie ever) - Star Trek the Next Generation (simply a rape of the original) - Wild Wild West Revisited, More Wild Wild West (hell, even the Wil Smith movie version was better) - Return of the Man from Uncle (pathetic) - I Spy Returns (hell, even the Eddy Murphy movie version was better)
And this list goes on and on, with such marvels as Return of the Six Million Dollar Man and the Bionic Woman 1, 2 & 3 (painfull because Six Million Dollar Man remains my all time favorite series), the three Hulk TV movies, etc.
So what we needed for Knight Rider was a remake or a re-imagining instead of a continuation. Sadly they choose the other road.
Another stupid thing about continuations is that they usually erase any other sequels but the loved ones out of continuity. Richard Hatch at one time wanted to make a continuation of the original Galactica show. At a convention I asked him when his proposed series would have been set, before or after Galactica 80. He said he would have erased G80 from continuity. Superman Returns erases S3 & S4 (and I really liked 'the night the Cylons landed' of G80 and I really liked Superman IV.) No matter how stupid some episodes are (Trek had 'Spock's brain') they were made and aired so if you make a continuation you have no right to erase them.
But that being said, this TV movie beats KR2000 by miles and I never bothered to watch KR2010.
On the bad side, there are plot holes so big that you can hide Jupiter in one of them. Here's an (incomplete) list: - Why didn't Charles Graiman get to KITT when the people of 'the electrical company' got to Ben? - Why didn't Charles Graiman grab a cell phone before he started running so he could call KITT? - How can KITT and the bad guys get from Graiman's place to the place where Sarah is holding a lecture and from there to Vegas in less time than it takes Graiman to reach a phone (booth) or Jennifer's place (a neighbor I presume since I can't see Graiman do 50km by foot.) - How did the bad guys and up at the casino? They lost Sarah and they didn't know about Mike.
The answer to the first 3 questions is simple. If Graiman had gotten to KITT or if he did grab a cell phone or got to a phone booth the movie would not have lasted over 5 minutes! But the third question still puzzles me.
Also on the bad side, is this supposed to be a continuation of Knight Rider or of Viper? And where's the turbo boost? Or the skiing? And is it just me or did Hasselhoff look drunk in his scenes? And why did the green screen effects (scene's inside the car) look so soap-like cheap?
On the bright side, I got used to the car. I got used to the voice (although there was a trailer with another voice ending in "But really, enough about me" and that voice was waaaay better than Kilmer's), I got used to the actors and the characters and I absolutely adored the final scene. I think the most popular thing people remember of the original show was the driving into- and out of the truck. When I saw the final scene I did get the impression that we were in the truck, although it did seem a bit wide. And when finally the ramp opened up I said "Yessss, finally" and felt my eyes getting wet from excitement. What I saw next (and I'm not going to spoil that scene) blew me out of my seat. Now that's a great ending! Too bad the rest of the movie didn't reach that level. Still I'd give that scene a 10. And the whole movie a 4 because of that last scene.
Tell Your Friends