Reviews

131 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Iron Claw (2023)
2/10
Disappointing made for tv melodrama
18 May 2024
I'm not getting it. Zac Efron in an absolute firght wig. This seems like a made for tv movie with a predictable story arc. I can't believe it passed for Oscar Bait. I guess the hype is for the athletic training the actors did for the roll. Don't get me, all the cast are rock solid actors. But this is not a well told story, it's not grabbing my attention except for the overacting and the bad authentic costumes and makeup. This picture is very much not for me.

Filling up space with characters to meet the limit. Filling up space with characters to meet the limit. Filling up space with characters to meet the limit.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Sails (2014–2017)
5/10
Middlebrow t&a story with bad dialogue writing. Entertainung enough
28 April 2024
This epuc spends to much time dialoguing plot points that would work better if they were demonstrated by action sequences that are expisitory. Otherwise a fairly straightforward story is made confusing and tedious. Or maybe it was poor editing choices that thwart the storyline juxtapositions so they are muddled. The acting is very uneven with a few standouts-the old cranky nemesis of Vein, the governor, Silver, among them. Dude that plays Blackbeard is just so bad an actor(rip), but this might have bedn his best effort, because he's not asked to carry the series, and alot of mediocre talent with bad accents and a thirst for melodramatic soliloquy, even better if done oiled up and barechested or with heaving bosom cinched to chin. A true Michael Bay classic.

Not bad if you've run out of interesting things on Netflix, Vikings and The Last Kingdom are far superior all around, for romantic historic adventure epics.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Daliland (2022)
3/10
Exceedlingly tedious
14 April 2024
If you saw Almost Famous, you've seen this movie. That's it. It's a tedious story told through the eyes of a young and beautiful artistic ingenue, dazzled by sordid drama and high camp of the tortured artist and his entourage and the soul crush of the business behind art. And you've seen it before, the scenes of the beautiful people writhing in soft focus dance, the artist posed before his work in moments of deeply mysterious contemplation. And because this is just a sloppy mess, it comes across as millenial era creatives filming pretty people romping through a designer wardrobe closet from the 1970's, playing dressup in pretty clothes as if it recreates something meaningful. A boring derivative costume drama about an eccentric surrealist. A most complete package of missed opportunities in story telling and performing, The cast used as props.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
30 for 30: I Hate Christian Laettner (2015)
Season 2, Episode 28
4/10
Well i didn't like it
26 March 2024
Back to back in march madness, compared to the doc of the fab five, just not very interesting. I didn't learn much that I didn't already know, it was very repetitive, the interviews had nothing but tropes and sound bytes. They gave it a try but the creators didn't build much of compelling narrative for such a repellent 'hate the player' iconclast personality. Some of the hate Laettner isn't on him, it's institutional. Duke has an outsized reputation considering what an elitist little stone bubble it is in the middle of Durham. But that tough love, bully you into being better uber competitive thing hasn't aged well. I wonder why Laettner didn't have better pro success? Oh well, he's aged well, seems happy, I hope he's evolved sunce he's had kids.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Soapy tropey nonsense-like cheap pink champagne it will give you a headache while you're still consuming.
22 March 2024
This could be any fill in the setting sex in the city rip off the the pop pretty girl problem of the moment. Griffin Dunn sadly continues to standing for any other wizened mild mannered corporate boss because he hasn't had a good role since After Hours. Eric Stolz again, is completely wasted. And the lead actors really don't have much to work with script wise. I wish I could tell you which pretty modern women with problems show it reminds me of, they all run together, all equally vaccuous, glib, barely scratching the surface of what they attempt to portray. Best guess is Girlfriends' Guide to Divorce. The ghostly presence of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson isn't helping. First two episodes I thought there might be hope but this is just ripped from the headlines nonsense for people who can't read good. By episode three, I'm bored.
14 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
House of straws
28 February 2024
God save everyone from their prick stepfathers from the 70's and 80's, those who survived abuse and those who didn't. Also, the woman presenting her obsession is building her online presence. Somewhere in between is a long winding syncretic account with no there there except perhaps wish fulfillment. It's self aggrandizing behavior inverted. Long story short, conventionally media pretty girl spins family history for drama and attention, and the newly minted MAX jumps at opportunity for the cheap. I hope she gets some more therapy. This is unwatchable and manipulative. Rape and murder core.....
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mighty Boosh (2003–2007)
8/10
Interesting if a bit lost in translation in the US
7 February 2024
American viewer here. I've been hereing this show referenced in various places without knowing why. Finally used the little knowledge device from my pocket and read up on it. I really just watched out of curiosity having often wondered who is that weird guy with the out of date 1970's glam rocker hair on the British baking show. He always seems so out of place but is obviously some sort of celebrity. So now I know his appearance is his trademark and he's pretty immune to embarassment. As far as the Boosch goes, Some of the bits go right over my head because I don't understand some of the local british references but it's very creative. Somehow it reminds me most of the very early Pee Wee Herman Show episodes, with the blend of art props music and dream stream of consciousness stuff. Also, Kids in the Hall, though it doesn't have Lorne Michaels production money behind it. And of course Tracey Ullman. Tracks with some experimental stuff from Night Flight in the 80's. It seems rather out of time for the 2000's, but then I have to remind myself that smart phones and social media hadn't infiltrated pop culture yet when this was made. This is some heavy duty Art School low budget project creativity and it grows on you if you appreciate that sort of thing. Cover page of Goth Weekly indeed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Chaotic mess with polish around the edges
26 January 2024
This is the 1950's cold war equivalent if trying to explain Qanonymous to a rational person. One crazy mess that takes hours to tell, and when you're finished, no one's the wiser but agree it was wasted time. I almost expected Julian Fellowes to be involved the campy melodrama and money spent on production and convoluted story lines that get more fraught the longer you watch. It's attempting to be a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma, but is really just reverse circlejerk. Decent Cast is wasted in a trashy senseless mess of a melodrama.

Blah blah blah bobs lawblob blah blah blah.blah.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not a doc series, just a reality show
21 December 2023
Problem with anarcho communal living is well, sooner or later there's lord of the flies drama unless everyone involved is very clear about what collective goals are and ethics are respected. 20 minutes in and this looks like big brother in the woods. And 'Man I know the CIA is looking at us' just demonstrates the level of thoughtfulness. Problem with every person you're gonna see here is the level of self importance and narcissism. Some of that will fade with age but not particularly helpful in a collective.

As for the commune v cult question, click bait irrelevance. Go do your thing. You should be far too busy growing animal tending and maintaining to be social media influence pedaling.

As for the show, i gave it 20 minutes before all the reality show structures fully came together. Not a documentary; nothing of note to learn here. You can't even see inside their "greenhouse" which has very little thermal or lighting functionality. So maybe it's their humboldt skunkweed bunker and arsenal. Ho hum.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Radical Wolfe (2023)
3/10
Michael Lewis coming off like a deliberate obtuse ingenue. He is not.
12 December 2023
Opening scene, i said to myself who is this numbskull in the seersucker suit who grew up in New Orleans and thinks it isn't a literary town. Because he didn't pay attention to authors names, like author of the Hardy Boys as a kid? And yet comes from old New Orleans money and elite east coast education, that takes as much pride in the finer points of art as they do about entertaining and making sure their kids marry well, conservative as their tastes may be.

Here's another fun quote: i look at him as a role midel, but an imperfect role model'. But I don't think anyone else took the chances that Tom Wolfe took, not just stylistically but morally. , as we scan to a black and white still of his sartorial choice of footware.

Michael Lewis thinks there was no sense of style in newspaper journalism before the 1960's. This is just lazy writing for an audience who has largely abandoned the written word in print as a mode of creativity, communication, and craft, of vocation.

AH Liebling, Studs Terkel, Dorothy Parker, Henry Miller, Ernest Hemingway, or the early Arm Forces work of Hunter S. Thompson Joan Didion, Molly Ivins or John McPhee. I could go on. Tom Wolfe is best known as a fashion plate who had a genius for explaining in detail one or another forces of contemporary culture to the more traditional culture mavens of the day. The Electric Acid Koolaid Test is well worth reading, but then you read Ken Kesey. Mau-Mauing the Flak-Catchers and I am Charlotte Simmons are bookends to a career that was prime and fashionable, but doesn't age well, becomes what it attempts to skewer.

This documentary kind of has the same problem and its less than the sum off its parts, a glossary of tidbits and quotes. It's lazy and boring.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
My ears and head hurt
10 December 2023
I lasted just long enough for red riding hood to make her first appearance. The face looks disturbingly plastic and the voice is terrible. Somehow Anna Kendrick was shrieking, and well, 5 minutes in and I know Tracey Ullman and Christine Baranski aren't going to salvage this abomination of filmed Musical theater.. i realize all the cast have the ambition to show off their singing chops because I guess they want to keep up with the masked singer or the greatest voice. But the libretto and the music are horrible. All ready know James Coburn or whatever his last name is is going to overdo every scene he is in so desperate is he to have someone love him. The music is hopelessly atonally modern without having a reason d'etre. Someone somewhere needs to step up and teach musical theater kids and their grown up counterparts about interpretation and the amazing versatility of vocal dynamics when people train and don't have an end goal of trying to screech over each other to convey meaning. It's discordant constant horrible noise. For godsakes the cast and director need to listen to some Ella Fitzgerald, Julie Andrews, and Maria Callas recordings. I want no more of this, was just rooting around on hulu looking for something mildly amusing to watch. This ain't it folks. Guess I'll watch only murders in the building again.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Big Sky (2020–2023)
1/10
Embarassing.
4 December 2023
Wasn't expecting a whole lot, but a basic level of function and wit in a David E Kelley ep series. But this is laughably bad, titillating made for tv movie drama. A few talented cast members can't save a modern day Charlie's Angels meets Mr Mercerdes meets Norman Bates wanna be creepy but with sheepskin and truckers and sex trafficking. The writing is just terrible. The characters cardboard, the tropes stultifying. You'd think with all that covid time on their hands, the writers might have come up with something interesting, but tge instacart delivered gummies were just too powerful. Woooeee, feel the rage and the crisp mountain air. .
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful movie if you are able to appreciate it
22 November 2023
Ponderous and suffocating are the only words I have for this film adaptation. And that is as intended. It's operatic tragedy masquerading as a period piece. I think that might have been it's appeal for Scorcese to challenge himself in his studies of the trappings of New York. Having lineage from people like this and people aspiring to this, I can appreciate it to a point, but it is rather two dimensional, which is perhaps as intended in the pov of the author. Great adaptation, beautifully designed and filmed, really nothing to complain about and yet, I do not like it. Not the fault of Scorcese, just my own bias. When this film came out, I avoided it like the plague. The film world then had so many interesting and diverse works to offer and this somehow seemed tired and been there done that. Still seems that way to me after 30 years, thematically. I will say this, I think Scorcese generally is more a perfector of than innovator in his illustrious career. That in the end is one of his gifts to the world, besides his detailed history of New York through era specific visual storytelling.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Participation trophies for all
17 November 2023
I'm not seeing what everyone else is gushing over. I'm waiting for the plot payoff but it's not coming and i'm at the end. Nothing insightful to think about.

My impressions:

Dennis Quaid is just bad in this. He really does have limits as an actor and this is beyond his scope.

Non exhaustive List of ensemble dramas about relationships of the era. Love Actually, Grand Canyon, Magnolia, Short Cuts, Boogie Nights, Singles, Four Weddings and a Funeral, the ice storm, all about my mother, big nighT, home for the holidays. This is another one. It doesn't stand out in any way. I fail to see the uniqueness others do. It is very much a 90's flick though.

Ryan Phillippe's frosted tips were ahead if their time. He still is just trying to be seductively reading lines.

Angelina Jolie proves once again that staring into a camera luminously with a remarkably beautiful face while reading lines does not equal acting.

Wooden performances from so many. Gena Rowlands and Sean Connery could sleepwalk through their roles and still have gravitas and i think they did.

Gillian Anderson had to try several things before she could find a way to demonstrate her abilities. This was an early attempt to bridge to a better place. Meh in Scully hair makeup and wardrobe.

John Stewart playing himself easily. He will always be my Death to Smoochie hero.

Madeline Stowe and Anthony whatever his name are are the most natural actors in this film. He's had alot of tv drama to practice with. Madeline just has a natural presence the way Spencer Tracey did.

Ellen Byrstyn type cast once and forever as mother in a crisis.

Jay Mohr is well, dying son in a bed trope, thankfully not overdoing his few lines. But role does not require much of him. His attempts to jump from snl to movies didn't work out well. He's not an actor. But his agent tried.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Killer (2023)
5/10
Meh and misses
12 November 2023
This seems sloppy. Goof-talk about the sunshine state and scenes very obviously south louisiana with plants architecture and then the french spelling. Some of that you's have to live in Louisiana to catch. But my point is, for a director known for meticulous work, this is not. It just seems sloppy, the voice over narration becomes annoying quickly, and there seem to be some continuity issues with the plot. It's also just not engrossing at all. No reason to be interested is given. Oerformances phoned in, even Tilda can't save it. Just another anti hero assassin movie with pulpy script. Yawns abound.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zombie Town (2023)
2/10
Oh its a lensed story alright
8 October 2023
Someone has to employ comedians from the last century and 19 years with longer bio's than they have film credits, so there's that. It's generally lacking in anything interesting of note. Kids in the Hall alums have done better things. But obviously this wasn't geared towards adults. I just have a hard time believing it is entertaining for YA either. Yawns galore. I gotta type somemore stuff for minimum character quota. Chevy Chase gives this movie gravitas if that tells you anything. Dan Akroyd gets to vent his paranoid delusions in a healthy way. I don't know, but kids these days they just don't understand.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reptile (2023)
9/10
Satisfying, surprisingly so
30 September 2023
Well what do you think if that. A neo noir drama meant for actual adults that is not insulting to the intelligence or wrapped up in gimmicks. Excellent casting of experienced character actors and nice performances from Alicia Silverstone, too many times typecast, and Justin Timberlake,not just a disney brat-boy band hottie . It's reminiscent of american crime dramas that rely on story and character and a sense of paranoia and foreboding rather than car chases, flashy scenario or snappy dialogue. I was pleasantly surprised. Much more restrained than say a Sydney Lumet drama. Nice to see new blood escaping typical formulas for the genre. It's always worth giving a look at what Benecio del Toro involves himself.
110 out of 143 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Encounters (2023)
5/10
Nothing new here, just discussion of belief systems
28 September 2023
I'm sure people saw something they can not explain, but that's the only relevation. One guy talking about knowing and having encoubters at night in his bed, clearing describing sleep paralysis. People are suggestible and have very different interpretations of unusual events and novel experiences. Unexplained doesn't necessarily mean extraterrestrial. This series tilts toward conspiracy and apocalypse cultures merging, and a subtle anti or post scientific pov. People are reaching for connection and creating these hybrid belief structures to replace what they have lost in traditional belief structures. Poignant, credulous revelations from real people and one or two skeptics or experts per episode to make it all 'fair and balanced'. Considering who some of the creative and productive crew are, you might think the final product would be better, but in the end it's just a more refined version of the traditional unexplained phenomenon media presentation that H. G Wells and Orson Welles proved was possible.
32 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Champions (2023)
3/10
Predictable
24 September 2023
I feel like there's a backstory here because Woody Harrelson doesn't do bs treaclish hollywood feelgood formulaic nonsense. He's # built a resilient career out of being selective and fearless. The bball team players are charming stand up performers, but this is just so predictable I honestly said some of the lines before they were spoken, verbatim. The special needs community deserves better than this and audiences don't need to be talked down or preached to. Kaitlin Olsen is as bad in this as she is in Curb Your Enthusiasm ir maybe worse. I guess there's something in the improv chemistry at IASIP, because otherwise she's just interesting.

The three is for the actors from the special needs community. Everyone else just phoned it in.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Stultifying
5 September 2023
It takes alot of work to make a golden age of late 20th boxing come from nothing champ's life vacuous fluff but this delivers. Such un-nuanced performances, a script with no momentum and nothing much to say, and the viewer comes away knowing nothing about Foreman that they didn't know if they were born before 2000 or read in a wiki page. Louis Gilliard jr channeling a Damon Wayans character from In Living Color is just embarassing in a cheap fright wig and beard.

The dialogue is just nothing but cheap cliches cut and pasted from inspirational sports drama trailers and the lead character has three facial expressions: pouty man baby, angry man baby, and aw shucks ignorant man baby. And like the joke in Zoolander-the expressions are all the same. Even Forest Whitaker struggles not to be a lifetime movie caricature. A terrible movie in the most bland way possible.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
BS High (2023)
1/10
Omg this is so pretentiously bad
27 August 2023
Partly my fault for wasting my time anymore now that serial documentaries are the 'erudite' alternative to reality programs for relatively cheap to produce streaming filler entertainment. I really can't take this glorification of a psychopath as star of the show to drive this story, it's sickening. It makes all the investigators and journalists complicit to the crime of glorifying his behavior simply by giving him a mic and a camera lens. It's not about anything else than Roy Johnson, so the title, pun included, and certainly the descriptions are deceiving. It's a cringe filled story you've heard many times before only this has been stretched from a 30-60 minute spot to a serial, a meta con with in a con with in a con. HBO is over. 30 on 30 produces much better sports documentaries. Notable quotes: "i could tell you some stories you'd never believe, but I'd literally say whatever I need to say to pull that dog up out you." "One of those stoid kids, I mean one of those young men that I like..."
6 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Throwback spirit in the best way
15 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Really interesting contemporary L. A. piece that has some elements that remind me of cool 70's and 80's outside the formula films like The Conversation and Body Double, elements like shot selection and composition and editing or how sound and dialogues are recorded with understated and minimal soundtrack that is itself reminiscent of that era, oarticularly the use of woodwinds and brass in suspenseful moments. And weirdness that somehow is just normal, especially for people who's day to day normality is a little less structured is depicted so well.

Best part is the phone calls from mom that are so grounded and yet otherworldly.

I think this film bears rewatching several times and mught just stick with you uf you're looking for something a little less ordinary.

Andrew Garfield is wonderful.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oppenheimer (I) (2023)
6/10
Mediocre misuse of concept for a historical film
30 July 2023
Dunkirk was such an extraordinary film visually and in the the story telling, so appreciately not overly sentimental or jingoistic. Oppenheimer, in contrast was just not that appealing and certainly less than the sum of its many many parts and ultimately is a disservice to the extraordinary moment which brought together so many extraordinary people together for better or worse in The Manhattan Project. As many others have stated this film was overhyped as something that must be seen on the biggest screen possible, preferably IMAX. For one absent one scene and a few 30 second cuts, there's nothing so requiring that type of scale. It's largely an office drama with an identity crisis. Sadly enough also, just oscar clickbait because this really wastes opportunities to delve into the imaginative scientific minds, the think tanks at Princeton, University of Chicago, UT-Knoxville, Bay area Universities, the strong european tradition that most of Manhattan Projects braintrust came from, or Oppenheimer's own personal upbringing, anything to reveal what made the subject tick and become the leader of such a weighty doomsday project. It also wasted the resource of an amazing amount of acting talent to no point. For despite everything that occurs in three hours the impression you are left with is that somehow the point of all of this is to produce The Richard Strauss Show by way of several minutes of Florence Pugh being provocatively naked and intellectual randomly with great lighting and makeup.

I bought the high art hype long enough to be intrigued at where we may could have traveled cinematically from the 'I am become Death, Destroyer of Worlds' from sanskrit portion of the show. But that happens in a different iteration of time from this, where Pugh's occasional nudity becomes arbitrarily exploitative for it's deliberate randomness, like so many other scenes. I feel sorry for viewers of this movie that know little or nothing of the science and political history of the Manhattan Project. They will be bewildered for no good reason, might just conclude that this was another elitist hollywood film rather just a poorly executed piece of cinematic storytelling.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Killing (2011–2014)
5/10
A smorgasbord of social problem tropes for every taste
28 July 2023
Interesting at first glance gloomy evocative procedural thriller trying to be Seattles answer to The Wire. Likable cast. But boy howdy it is pathetic a trope-a-riffic slog, like when Alan Alda and Mike Farrell started writing and directing episodes of MASH. If there was a social problem ofrom the headlines when this series came out, it's in here and little by little the melodrama takes over as all the various subplots and subtexts walk all over each other. It's exhausting. And that's only half way through season one.

-Corrupt power players v the idealistic and gifted do gooder in a mayoral election with implications for larger political machinations. And everyone obviously suffering from Seasonal Affective Disorder, because its Seattle, where when it rains, firehose rivulets drain down the window panes. Oh Boy.

-jurisdictional fights between the overworked hassled good guys ( local pd) v the feds(fbi) because terrorism -overstepped boundaries between students and faculty -overstepped boundaries in police civil service that prevent a wedding and a detective from retiring and moving because you gotta train the rookie and yoyr supervisor still has your separation paperwork. And you know police unions aren't at all effective. This is the initial problem that sets in motion everything else in the serial telling.

-fear of islam and immigrants -those lost skater punks in chuck taylors and flannel shirts -drugs and teenagers -social media and teenagers -teenagers and sex -politics and sex, especially in expensive glass offices -hidden pasts/hidden agendas -single mothers in the work place and the struggle to keep a man, keep the kids -problems with the working man the unions and the waterfront -serial killers and or terrorism and or sex trafficking -The Polish Mob -Political campaign professionals are amoral assholes -Dry drunks and 12 steps.

Hasn't aged well in a post wokeist q pilled kinda world.
0 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Witcher (2019– )
1/10
Janky production as a sleep aide.
7 July 2023
I keep trying to watch this series, but it keeps putting me to sleep despite all the energy thrown at making big sexy fantasy tropes sexy. I never read the source material, so can't expound on all the ways it fails to live up to fan expectations. But generally speaking it is possible to create adaptations that engage people unfamiliar with the stories. It's also possible to fail utterly. The Witcher is most definitely a dismal mismatched, disorganized failure.

As far as the cast goes, it's full of attractive people in mostly beautifully made goth kid renfaire costumes, either grimacing or botox-posturing thru a script of utter randomness. Occasionally there is a cheesy soft porn Conan the Barbarian vibe to the big sexy action parts. Many more times the effects compare to the budget and quality of late 90's sci-fi channel quality.

Honestly, this series has so little going despite all the scenery, set and costume changes, it's hard to give credence to any controversy about the one A-List star finally abandoning a project that feels like it never had any life to recommend it in the first place. His acting abilities are not demonstrated here, unless it is to mirror the wooden countenances of his fellow cast mates.

It's just another janky, fill the streaming platform with a fantasy for the GOT/LOTR demographic that we can stretch into as many episodes as possible, production.
42 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed