Change Your Image
cleontico
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
Zorro (2024)
Show puts a unique spin on a classic character
I was so excited when I found out the Spanish/Mexicans were going to do their own take on Zorro after two Hollywood takes on the story (I enjoyed both the Tyrone Power and Antonio Banderas versions immensely). The setting is familiar but the show introduces a whole host of new character dynamics through Zorro's interactions with the local indigenous population, Russian businessmen, and residents of Chinatown in addition to Spanish/Mexican residents of California which keeps the source material fresh and allows the TV show to explore the world of post-Spanish California in greater depth than any of the prior movies could simply due to running time. Miguel Bernadeau is no Banderas but he does a good job with Zorro and the supporting cast delivers satisfying performances. The show is not perfect (For example, I feel more interactions between Lolita and Diego as Zorro were necessary before she figures out the truth as they only meet towards the end of the season and she puts two and two together a little too quickly for me, almost implausibly). But all in all, a highly enjoyable take on Zorro and for me personally, a welcome reprieve from the mostly heavy, pessimistic and graphically violent fare dominating TV today.
Teen Titans (2003)
Pretty, pretty good
Let me start by saying I am NOT an anime fan, not in the least. I have never watched an anime cartoon, EVER. That being said, I should have been turned off by this show from the very beginning just because of the anime influence. But I wasn't.
1. If you watch the show, there really isn't THAT much anime. It's an American show with Western-style animation occasionally throwing in some anime.
2. Many people were complaining it isn't clear which incarnation of Robin this is, Tim Drake or Dick Grayson. I repeat, WATCH THE SHOW. There are plenty of anvil-sized hints throughout the show clearly indicating that this is Dick Grayson. (i.e, Robin mentioning he has a father then showing the camera panning up to bats flying away, a quick reference to Dick Grayson's 1940s "Boy Wonder" introduction, even the FREAKING Flying Graysons (Dick's late parents) are shown at one point.) You cannot get more in your face than this.
3. Humor. The humor is pretty darn good. At least I laughed quite a few times. It's very varied, ranging from self-referential to deadpan to snark.
4. Like any TV Show, there are hits and misses. There are really good episodes and there are weaker episodes.
5. CHILDISH? It's a kid's show for crying out loud! Stop complaining. I swear, sit down and try to watch what is on nowadays. You will balk at what is considered "humor." Watch Sanjay and Craig for five minutes, I dare you. You will run away crying.
Bottom line, this a pretty, pretty good show. I enjoy it very much. It's fun and I feel like it usually has the right mix of humor, action and occasionally drama. Most people who have been hating on this show watched the first episode and stopped. You can't determine the quality of a series just from watching ONE episode. Check it out, give it a chance. Don't knock it till you've tried it.
Independence Day (1996)
One of my favorite 90's flicks
This and Terminator 2. There is a lot to like about film. Of course, there are plenty of clichés and if you take the time to do an in- depth analysis, you will find a few plot holes (however minor). But the film overall is really good. The cast is really good at exhibiting emotion (with the exception of Will Smith who always acts like a comedian). SPOILER ALERT: I really felt it when the President's wife died or when David and Constance were discussing their divorce. The movie also really deserves it's Oscar for best special effects. That shot of the White House blowing up is SO good, you wince (not because the effect was bad, but because it's the freakin' White House being blown to smithereens.) The film borrows elements used previously by other alien/sci-fi action films but it also has many unique elements. I mean, how many action movies nowadays take almost an hour to develop characters before getting to the main action? (That was a good choice, on behalf of the film, BTW. I was pleasantly surprised when watching it for the first time.) Bottom line, the film has it's cheesy moments, but it is very entertaining, fun and even heartfelt at times. I loved it. Must-watch for any sci-fi or action movie fan.
Muppets Most Wanted (2014)
Like an extra-long fun good-old Muppets episode
It was a lot of fun. It felt like a movie-length Muppets episode. It was slightly weaker than the last movie. I kind of missed Amy Adams and Jason Segel but Tina Fey, Ty Burrell and Ricky Gervais were very entertaining. The cameos were fun as usual. And of course, the phenomenal Muppets. Kermit, Fozzie, Miss Piggy and the recently introduced Walter. Great songs, fun plot and plenty of jokes to keep you chuckling. There are a few action sequences which were very fun as well. In this movie, the Muppets are on a European tour. Things are falling apart backstage and there is tension between Kermit and the rest of the Muppet crew. Kermit is kidnapped by a Russian criminal, Constantine, unknown to everyone else. What will happen next? Watch to find out! "We're doing a sequel......we're back by popular demand"
Cars 2 (2011)
Why so much hate? It was okay
I keep reading reviews for Cars 2 and I am kind of surprised. Some people went as far as comparing it to the Star Wars prequels. Sure, Cars 2 definitely is no "Finding Nemo" or "Toy Story." But it sure was fun, at least for me. The plot was an obvious reference to James Bond and Mission Impossible. I enjoyed the spy gadgets and political overtones. It was action-packed and not only enjoyable for little kids, but for older kids and adults too. Why all the hate? Heck, even Roger Ebert and Rolling Stone liked it!
In my opinion, Cars 1 was a little slow. It dragged a little too long in certain parts. Cars 2 suffers from no such thing.
To sum it up; Cars 2 may not be Toy Story but it sure is FUN and ENTERTAINING.
Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters (2013)
AAAAAHHHHH! What have they done? (Dramatic Music)
Okay, I'll chill out enough to write this review. Geez, what did they do? They messed up the story even more than they did in the first movie. Here is a list of negatives and the few positives:
Negatives: 1. Where are the gods?
2. Luke fell into the cyclop's cave. Did it eat him? If it did, what the hell? He can't die, he's vital to the plot, especially in the last book! He saves Olympus and everything, remember? You read the books, right?
3. Annabeth is so dumb in the movie it hurts. I mean, she is the daughter of Athena. In the books she was so smart and such a great character. In the movie they turned her into a complete damsel-in- distress. It's so annoying.
4. What the heck was it with revealing the prophecy in the second book? The prophecy wasn't revealed until the last book.
5. They resurrected Kronos in the second movie, already? He is only resurrected in the fourth book.
They basically gave away too much. There is no point in making Book 3 and Book 4, even Book 5.
Positives:
1. Humor.
2. The music was pretty good.
3. The effects were pretty good.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!!!!!
Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (2013)
Awesome, better than expected!
I am a big fan of the Marvel movies! I was hyped to watch this TV Show. If there was one thing I was scared of was that they would make a really bad TV Show and ruin everything. They did the exact opposite. They made an amazing, awesome, action-filled TV Show! it's a great sequel to the movie and further explores the world of S.H.I.E.L.D. I had my eyes glued to the screen the entire time. The characters are great and the actors are spectacular. The plot was great and keeps you interested. Heck, it's Marvel! I am going to watch every episode, every week of this TV Show. I hope they renew it for a second season. Big thumbs up. Great job, ABC!
Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief (2010)
i had high expectations but...
I am a big fan of the Percy Jackson series and had high expectations for this movie. The first thing I noticed is that the characters are all teenagers instead of tweens as in the books. The second thing I noticed is the characters themselves: Annabeth is a smart girl with blond hair in the books while in the movies she has brown hair and they portray her as some hot action girl. Grover is supposed to be shy in the books but in the movie they portray him as a girl crazy, chick magnet. Third, they changed the storyline! Annabeth and Percy don't start any romantic stuff until the fourth book yet they almost kiss in the first movie! Dude? Where is Argus, Dionysus, Clarisse, and Ares? And the fight with Luke happened after they returned to Camp Half Flood, not before!
Overall, I felt disappointed. I wish the characters would have been kids as in the books so I could watch them grow up but instead they're teenagers and it gives the movie a highschool musical type of feel. I felt the movie was a rip-off of Harry Potter with the special effects being very similar to the Harry Potter movies. This adaptation is a disgrace to the Rick Riordan novels.
Cheaper by the Dozen (2003)
okay movie
This movie was okay. It showed some good lessons on family values. It taught how one decision can affect a whole family. It shows how important it is to respect each other. There are a couple touching scenes that bring tears to my eyes and make you be thankful that you have a family such as when Tom and Kate have an argument and one of their daughters asks: "Daddy, are you and mommy gonna divorce?" When Mark runs away and shares an emotional moment with his father and they are both crying is also very touching. Ashton Kutcher is great and really funny. There wasn't enough of him in this film. I think they should have given Kutcher the opportunity to show more. Anyone watch "Two and a half men?" Anyway, it's an okay movie. Watch it once or twice but no more than that. second movie is much better!